Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03450408

Foley Bulb Insertion Method: Blind vs. Direct

The investigators will compare, in a randomized clinical trial, two methods of placement (placement with a gloved hand vs. placement with a sterile speculum) of a Foley bulb transcervical dilator. The primary outcome is rate of infection.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Age range

18 year–50 year

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of Texas Medical Branch John Sealy Hospital

Galveston, Texas, 77555, United States

About this study

The target population for this study is women who present for scheduled induction of labor. If there is a decision by the obstetric team to place a transcervical Foley dilator for cervical ripen-ning, the obstetric team will notify the research team so that the patient may be screened for the study. If the patient consents to participation, written informed consent will be obtained by person-to-person contact. The PI, study coordinator, or a collaborator will be responsible for the in-formed consent. After informed consent is obtained, the patient will be randomized to the study group (digital placement) or the control group (placement with a sterile speculum).

The control group will undergo induction of labor by placement via sterile speculum of a 22-French transcervical Foley catheter. The cervix is visualized with a sterile vaginal speculum and cleaned with iodine or chlorhexidine. A Foley catheter is introduced into the cervix and the bal-loon is filled with 60 ml of sterile 0.9% NaCl. The Foley catheter will be left in place for at least 12 hours, and no longer than 24 hours. After placement standard intrapartum management of the patient will ensue.

The study group will undergo induction of labor by digital blind placement of a 22-French trans-cervical Foley catheter. A Foley catheter is introduced into the cervix using digits and hands wearing sterile gloves and the balloon is filled with 60 ml of sterile 0.9% NaCl. The Foley catheter will be left in place for at least 12 hours, and no longer than 24 hours. After placement standard intrapartum management of the patient will ensue.

If cervix remains unfavorable after extraction of the dilators (< 3cm and at most 60% effaced), a second Foley catheter will be used in this case for a maximum of 12 hrs. No crossover will be allowed. In other words, a second Foley bulb will be placed in the same manner as the first assignment arm.

In any attempts, if the Foley bulb is not able to be placed in either insertion technique , a prostaglandin agent for cervical ripening may be used and insertion of the mechanical dilator can be re-attempted at a later time, as is the standard of care at our institution. No cross over will be allowed.

This will be an unblinded randomized clinical trial.

No significant adverse effects are expected with the use of transcervical Foley catheters for mechanical dilation. The most significant risks are vaginal bleeding due to cervical trauma and incidental rupture of membranes, as well as pain or discomfort with placement. The patient will undergo inpatient induction of labor, so any adverse reaction would be promptly detected and addressed.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Women between the ages of 18 and 50 years
  • Induction of labor
  • Plan for Foley bulb placement by the managing obstetrics team

Exclusion criteria

  • Patient unwilling or unable to provide consent
  • Fetal demise or major congenital anomaly
  • Immunosuppressed patients: i.e., taking systemic immunosuppressants or steroids (e.g. transplant patients; not including steroids for lung maturity), HIV with CD4<200, or other
  • Fever (>38°C) in the 48 hours prior to presentation for induction of labor
  • Use of anti-pyretic agent (i.e., acetaminophen) in the eight hours preceding admission for induction of labor

Treatment and study plan

Method of placement of Foley bulb transcervical dilator

Procedure

This trial will assess two methods used to place a Foley bulb transcervical dilator.

Primary outcomes

  1. Infection

    Time frame: Labor to 30 days postpartum

    Pooled maternal infection

Secondary outcomes

  1. Maternal fever

    Time frame: From beginning of labor process to time of discharge, up to seven days

    Greater than or equal to 38 degrees Celsius

  2. Request for pain relief

    Time frame: Within 30 minutes of placement procedure

    Request for IV pain medications or epidural placement

  3. Vaginal bleeding

    Time frame: Within 30 minutes of placement procedure

    In the time period immediately following placement

  4. Artificial rupture of membranes

    Time frame: At time of placement of Foley bulb transcervical dilator

    Rupture of amniotic sac

  5. Chorioamnionitis or "triple I"

    Time frame: From beginning of labor process until time of delivery

    Presumptive or confirmed diagnosis

  6. Endometritis

    Time frame: From time of delivery to 30 days postpartum

    Postpartum intrauterine infection

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Foley Bulb Insertion by Blind Placement Versus Direct Visualization: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Acronym: FrIENDly

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Mar 1, 2018
Registry last updated
May 7, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.