Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07168850

Focused Ultrasound Unilateral Pallidotomy for Medication-Refractory Limb Dystonia

The goal of this clinical trial is to find out if a non-invasive procedure called focused ultrasound can safely and effectively treat limb dystonia in adults who have not improved with medications or botulinum toxin injections.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

* Does focused ultrasound reduce the severity of limb dystonia symptoms? * Is the procedure safe and well tolerated?

Researchers will compare people who receive focused ultrasound treatment to those who receive a sham procedure (a look-alike procedure without active treatment) to see if the treatment works.

Focused ultrasound works by producing a very small (millimeter-size) lesion in a deep brain region. In this study, the lesion is located in a region called globus pallidus, which helps control movement.

Participants will:

* Be randomly assigned to one of two groups: focused ultrasound or sham * Undergo a procedure using MRI and focused ultrasound to target a part of the brain called the globus pallidus * Be followed for 6 months after treatment to assess changes in symptoms, quality of life, and brain function * Participants in the sham group will be offered the real treatment after 3 months

This study may offer a new non-surgical treatment option for people with dystonia affecting the arm or leg, whose pharmacological control is unsatisfactory.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Azienda ULSS3 Serenissima, Mestre, (Venice), Italy

Loading trial locations.

About this study

The FUTURE study is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, multicenter national clinical trial aimed at assessing the efficacy and safety of unilateral MR-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) pallidotomy in patients with limb dystonia that is refractory to standard pharmacological treatments.

Dystonia is a movement disorder characterized by sustained or intermittent muscle contractions, causing abnormal movements or postures. In many cases, focal or segmental dystonias affecting the limbs can be managed with oral medications and botulinum toxin (BoNT) injections. However, a subset of patients does not respond adequately to these treatments. For such individuals, surgical intervention may offer relief, yet it remains underutilized due to concerns about invasiveness and complications.

Recent advancements in non-invasive neurosurgical techniques have introduced MRgFUS pallidotomy, a procedure that uses focused ultrasound beams under real-time MRI guidance to precisely ablate small brain targets-in this case, the globus pallidus internus (GPi). The FUTURE study specifically explores this technique as a less invasive alternative to deep brain stimulation, especially for patients with focal or segmental limb dystonia who are ineligible or reluctant to undergo conventional surgery.

The trial will enroll 34 adult patients with idiopathic or genetic limb dystonia that has proven resistant to pharmacologic and BoNT treatment. These patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either:

  • an active treatment group, undergoing unilateral GPi lesioning via MRgFUS,
  • or a sham control group, receiving the same procedural setup but without therapeutic sonications.

At three months post-randomization, all patients in the sham group will cross over to receive the active MRgFUS treatment, allowing within-subject comparisons while ensuring ethical access to the therapeutic intervention. The follow-up period for each patient will last six months after active treatment, totaling a maximum of nine months of participation.

The primary endpoint is the change in motor severity as measured by the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) at three months post-treatment. Secondary endpoints include adverse event frequency, patient and clinician global impressions of change, disability assessments (e.g., QuickDASH), quality of life (SF-36), and neurocognitive testing.

Additionally, the study will incorporate neurophysiological (TMS) and neuroimaging (resting-state fMRI) techniques to investigate treatment-induced changes in cortical excitability, plasticity, and functional connectivity, providing insight into the neural mechanisms underlying clinical improvement.

The FUTURE study is coordinated by the Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy with participation from other three major Italian neurological institutes. It represents a pioneering effort to evaluate focused ultrasound as a non-invasive therapeutic option for patients with disabling and treatment-resistant forms of limb dystonia.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18-80 years
  • Able and willing to consent and attend visits
  • Idiopathic or hereditary limb dystonia (focal, segmental, or multifocal; isolated or combined)
  • Refractory to oral therapy and botulinum toxin
  • Stable medication for ≥30 days and ≥90 days since last BoNT
  • Capable of communicating during Exablate procedure

Exclusion criteria

  • Acquired secondary dystonia
  • Dementia or other neurodegenerative disorders
  • Any clinically significant or unstable medical condition, which, in the opinion of the principal investigator or the clinician delegated by the principal investigator, may put the participant at risk when participating in the study (e.g., unstable heart disease or coagulopathy; uncontrolled psychiatric comorbidity)
  • Prior deep brain stimulation or other brain surgery
  • Any contraindication to MRI
  • Skull Density Ratio (SDR) < 0.40
  • Significant brain lesions (eg brain tumor, significant white matter lesions or globus pallidus interna lesions on baseline MRI)
  • Pregnancy

Treatment and study plan

Exablate MR-guided Focused Ultrasound Pallidotomy

Device

Active Pallidotomy

Sham Sham Exablate MRgFUS Pallidotomy

Device

Sham procedure. Identical setup without thermal lesioning. Participants cross over to Active Pallidotomy after 3 months.

Primary outcomes

  1. Chenge in the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS)

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

    The BFMDRS has a maximum score of 120 for the movement subscale and 30 for the disability subscale. Higher scores indicating more severe dystonia.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Incidence of treatment-related adverse events

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

    Assessment of any treatment-related adverse events throughout the whole study period

  2. Changes in the Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder & Hand (Quick-DASH) score

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24

    The QuickDASH is a shortened, 11-item version of the DASH Outcome Measure, designed to assess physical function and symptom severity related to the arm, shoulder, and hand. Maximum score 100; the greater the score the grear the disability.

  3. Changes in the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) score

    Time frame: Baseline, week 12 and week 24

    The CGIC is a 7-point scale used to assess the degree of change in a patient's condition since the start of treatment or another defined baseline. Lower scores indicates improvement and higher scores indicating worsening of the patient's condition.

  4. Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 and week 24

    The maximum score of the PGIC is 7: the higher the score the higher the improvement reported by a patient.

  5. Change in the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) score

    Time frame: Baseline, week 12 and week 24

    The SF-36 questionnaire has a maximum score of 100 for each of its eight scaled scores (physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health). The higher the scores the more favorable is health state within that specific dimension.

  6. Changes in the Short-Interval Cortical Inhibition (SICI)

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

    This is a neurophysiological measure of inhibitory processes within the motor cortex, assessed using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, which is measured as the relative amplitude reduction of motor evoked potentials from the test stimulus when it is preceded by the conditioning stimulus. The greater the change in SICI, the greater the pallidotomy-induced changes in motor cortex intracortical inhibitory circuits

  7. Changes in intracortical facilitation (ICF)

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

    This is a neurophysiological measures of cortical excitability, assessed using paired-pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, which describes an increase in the magnitude of a motor evoked potential in a target muscle when a suprathreshold test pulse is preceded by a subthreshold conditioning pulse at specific interstimulus intervals. The greater the change in ICF, the greater the pallidotomy-induced changes in intracortical excitatory circuits

  8. Changes in Paired Associative Stimulation (PAS)

    Time frame: Baseline and week 24

    This is a neurophysiological measure of cortical plasticity assessed using transcranial magnetic stimulation. The greater the change in PAS, the greater the pallidotomy-induced changes in motor cortex synaptic plasticity

  9. Changes in brain activity (using functional connectivity) using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI)

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

    The investigators will conduct a region-of-interest analysis to calculate changes of fMRI functional connectivity between baseline and post-pallidotomy.

  10. Changes in pallidotomy lesion morphology via contrast MRI

    Time frame: 24-hour after the procedure, week 12 and week 24

    To evaluate the morphological changes of the lesion after 24 hours, 3 months and 6 months from pallidotomy using contrast-enhanced brain MRI and their relationship with clinical changes including adverse events.

  11. Changes in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score

    Time frame: Baseline, week 12 and week 24

    Changes in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score, a 30-point test of global cognitive functions. Score range: 0-30, with lower scores indicating worse cognitive function and higher scores indicating better cognitive function.

  12. Change in Digit Span test score

    Time frame: Baseline, week 12 and week 24]

    Change in Digit Span test score, a cognitive test assessing memory functions. Score range: 0-[insert maximum score for the test], with lower scores indicating greater memory impairment and higher scores indicating better memory function.

  13. Change in the Stroop Test score

    Time frame: Baseline, week 12 and week 24

    Change in Stroop Test scores, a neuropsychological test assessing frontal-lobe executive cognitive function. Score range: [insert minimum]-[insert maximum], with higher scores or slower reaction times indicating worse executive cognitive function.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Giovanna Zorzi

CONTACT

[email protected]

+390223942712

Roberto Eleopra

CONTACT

[email protected]

+390223942552

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta

Other

Collaborators

  • Azienda Ospedaliera Villa Sofia
  • Azienda ULSS 3 Serenissima
  • IRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo

Registry information

Official study title

Focused Ultrasound Pallidotomy for Medication-Refractory Limb Dystonia (FUTURE Study)

Acronym: FUTURE

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Sep 11, 2025
Registry last updated
Feb 11, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.