Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, VA
Richmond, Virginia, 23249-0001, United States
NCT Number: NCT03796598
Patients with end stage of liver disease or cirrhosis can develop confusion due to high ammonia and inflammation. This confusion is brought upon by changes in the bacteria in the bowels and may not respond to current standard of care treatments. Repeated episodes of confusion can make it difficult for patients to function and may result in multiple admissions to the hospital and burden on the family. The investigators have studied using a healthy person's stool to replace the bowel bacteria, called fecal microbial transplant, in small studies with good results. In this trial the investigators propose to perform these procedures using an upper and lower route in Veterans who suffer from this condition and follow them for safety and HE and related hospitalizations over 6 months. The investigators will compare this to placebo treatments and hope that this intervention can improve the health and daily functioning of affected patients.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me21 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Richmond, Virginia, 23249-0001, United States
Indication: Cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy
Study Objectives: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of fecal transplant in patients with cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy
Rationale and Supporting Evidence:
Hepatic encephalopathy affects 30-45% of patients with cirrhosis and adversely affects survival in these patients. The mainstay of treatment for hepatic encephalopathy (HE) has long been the manipulation of the gut flora through antibiotics, prebiotics or probiotics. The current first and second line therapies for HE in the US are lactulose and rifaximin respectively that uniquely act within the confines of the gut lumen with encouraging clinical results. However, there is a subset of patients with HE that continues to recur despite being on both treatments. This patient group is at a higher risk of poor outcomes because HE has now been removed from liver transplant priority and multiple episodes of HE can result in cumulative brain injury which may be irreversible. Therefore, the prevention of recurrent HE is an important therapeutic goal.
The investigators' group and other reports have shown that patients with HE and cirrhosis are more likely to have overgrowth of potentially pathogenic bacterial taxa such as Enterobacteriaceae and reduction of autochthonous species such as Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae in the stool and the colonic mucosa. This has been linked to poor performance on cognitive tests that are a hallmark of HE and with increased systemic inflammation in these patients.
Therefore, a gut-based therapeutic option that can potentially improve the recurrence rate and the overall prognosis is needed. Fecal transplant has been shown to be effective in conditions with predominant gut-bacterial overgrowth or alteration such as recurrent Clostridium difficile and inflammatory bowel disease. Safe protocols have been developed across the world and studies are being performed in the US under FDA-monitored INDs. Limitations to performing fecal transplant include identifying and screening appropriate donors, which is time consuming and costly, with the cost typically falling to the patient or donor as the required screening is generally not covered by insurance.
The investigators' preliminary data suggest that a one-time administration of an FMT-enema using a rationally-selected donor is safe in patients with cirrhosis and recurrent HE. However, given the small bowel overgrowth and the predominantly small bowel location for bacterial translocation in cirrhosis, which is out of the reach of an enema, an upper GI route for FMT needs to be explored. In the investigators' published experience, a single enema from a rationally-derived donor was associated with significantly lower total and HE-related hospitalizations compared to patients who were randomized to standard of care, with a stable long-term course over >1 year. The investigators' data show that FMT was associated with favorable changes in fecal bile acid (BA) profile with a decrease in proportions of fecal secondary BAs, conjugated BAs and increase in sulfated BAs, indicating a healthier milieu. The investigators also have preliminary data defining the safety of oral FMT capsules in patients with cirrhosis and HE in a current trial led by us. The use of combined oral and rectal routes of FMT, which can potentially alleviate both small bowel and colonic translocation are likely to be better than either alone.
Overall aim: To determine the effect of dual oral and rectal administration of FMT from a rational donor on clinical outcomes (HE and related hospitalizations, brain function, quality of life) and host-microbiota interactions (microbial composition and bile acid composition with systemic and intestinal inflammation), compared to single route of administration and placebo, along with a second oral capsular FMT vs placebo administration in patients with cirrhosis and HE using a randomized, phase II clinical trial.
Design overview: Four groups of outpatients with cirrhosis will be randomized using random sequence generator into placebo and FMT groups and followed for 6 months under an FDA IND double-blind clinical trial.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Other Exclusion Criteria:
Oral capsules of FMT
FMT enema
Placebo
Time frame: 6 months
Number of patients with serious adverse events between groups related to FMT, especially related to HE
Time frame: 6 months
Number of patients with adverse events that do not fit the criteria of serious adverse events between groups related to FMT
Time frame: 6 months
Shannon diversity index compared to baseline and engraftment related to the donor at baseline, within 30 days and then monthly till 6 months. Ranges usually from 0-10, higher values represent a better diversity. There are no maximum values.
Time frame: 30 days and 6 months
Quality of life assessment change defined by Sickness Impact Profile total score at 30 days and 6 months between groups. This is a percentage result ranges usually from 0-100. A higher score indicates worse quality of life related to the participant's health within 24 hours.
Time frame: 60 days
Cognitive assessment change using the Psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score between groups at 60 days Range is -15 to +5 and higher is better
Time frame: 60 days
Cognitive assessment change using the Stroop Off and On Time change at 60 days and 6 months. This is in seconds. EncephalApp stroop is a computerized test of attention, psychomotor speed and cognitive flexibility. A higher time required to complete 5 correct runs in both Off and On stages is the measure here. There no maximum values but the lower amount of time that is needed, the better is the cognitive function.
Time frame: 60 days
Shannon diversity index compared to baseline at 30 days and then monthly till 6 months. Ranges usually from 0-10. Higher values represent a better diversity. There are no maximum values.
Time frame: 6 months
Number of patients with Hepatic encephalopathy related events
VA Office of Research and Development
Fed
Fecal Microbiota Transplant in Veterans With Cirrhosis
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07480096
Brain Diseases, Brain Diseases, Metabolic
Jakarta, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia
View Trial DetailsNCT06245473
Brain Diseases, Brain Diseases, Metabolic
Paris, France
View Trial DetailsNCT05376488
Brain Diseases, Brain Diseases, Metabolic
Richmond, Virginia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04899115
Brain Diseases, Brain Diseases, Metabolic
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
View Trial Details