Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT07623499

Flywheel Training Effects on Power and Performance in Youth Olympic Weightlifters

This study investigated the effects of flywheel inertial training on lower-limb power, trunk stability, and Olympic weightlifting performance in youth athletes. Eighteen youth Olympic weightlifters were allocated to a flywheel training group or a control group. Both groups continued their regular weightlifting training over a 10-week intervention period. The experimental group performed additional flywheel-based exercises twice weekly. Outcomes included measures of lower-limb power, trunk inclination during lifting, weightlifting performance, and technical error frequency.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Sports Performance

Age range

13 year–17 year

Sex eligibility

Male

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Damietta University, Faculty of Sports Science

Damietta, 34517, Egypt

About this study

This study investigated the effects of flywheel inertial training on lower-limb power, trunk stability, and Olympic weightlifting performance in youth athletes. Flywheel training is an eccentric-overload method that has been suggested to enhance neuromuscular adaptations, particularly in power and movement control. Eighteen youth Olympic weightlifters participated in this controlled intervention study and were allocated into a flywheel training group and a control group.

Both groups continued their regular Olympic weightlifting training program, which included technical practice of the snatch and clean, strength exercises, and general physical preparation. The experimental group additionally performed flywheel-based exercises twice per week over a 10-week training period. The intervention was progressively structured to ensure appropriate load adaptation and technical execution.

Outcome measures included assessments of lower-limb power, trunk inclination during lifting positions, performance in the snatch and clean, and technical error frequency. Pre- and post-intervention comparisons were used to evaluate the effects of the training program.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male youth Olympic weightlifters aged 13-17 years
  • Actively participating in structured Olympic weightlifting training
  • Technical ability to perform snatch and clean lifts
  • Free from musculoskeletal injury at the time of participation
  • Medically fit for resistance training and high-intensity exercise

Exclusion criteria

  • Presence of injury limiting participation in training or testing
  • Absence rate greater than 20% of training or intervention sessions
  • Participation in additional structured lower-limb eccentric or flywheel training outside the study program
  • Any medical condition contraindicating resistance training

Treatment and study plan

Flywheel Inertial Training

Behavioral

Flywheel inertial training was performed twice weekly for 10 weeks in addition to regular Olympic weightlifting training. The program included lower-limb and trunk exercises such as squats, split squats, Romanian deadlifts, pulling variations, and core stabilization exercises. The training emphasized eccentric overload and progressive resistance to enhance power production and movement control.

Other names: Flywheel resistance training; eccentric overload training

Traditional Weightlifting Training

Behavioral

Participants performed conventional Olympic weightlifting training including snatch and clean and jerk technique practice, squats, pulling exercises, strength exercises, mobility exercises, and general physical preparation according to the regular training program.

Primary outcomes

  1. Snatch Performance

    Time frame: Baseline and 10 weeks post-intervention

    Snatch performance was assessed as the best successful snatch lift completed by each participant according to technical criteria. The unit of measurement was kilograms (kg). The outcome was analyzed as the change in kilograms from baseline to 10 weeks.

  2. Clean Lift Performance

    Time frame: Baseline and 10 weeks post-intervention

    Clean lift performance was assessed as the best successful clean lift completed by each participant without performing the jerk phase. The unit of measurement was kilograms (kg). The outcome was analyzed as the change in kilograms from baseline to 10 weeks.

  3. Countermovement Jump Height

    Time frame: Baseline and 10 weeks post-intervention

    Countermovement jump height was measured to assess lower-limb explosive power. The unit of measurement was centimeters (cm). The outcome was analyzed as the change in centimeters from baseline to 10 weeks.

  4. Trunk Inclination Angle During Snatch Receiving Position

    Time frame: Baseline and 10 weeks post-intervention

    Trunk inclination angle was measured during the lowest stable snatch receiving position using video-based kinematic analysis. The angle was measured from the vertical reference line passing through the hip joint. The unit of measurement was degrees (°). The outcome was analyzed as the change in degrees from baseline to 10 weeks. A lower angle indicates a more upright trunk position.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Squat Jump Height

    Time frame: Baseline and 10 weeks post-intervention

    Squat jump height was measured to assess concentric lower-limb power. The unit of measurement was centimeters (cm). The outcome was analyzed as the change in centimeters from baseline to 10 weeks.

  2. Standing Long Jump Distance

    Time frame: Baseline and 10 weeks post-intervention

    Standing long jump distance was measured to assess horizontal lower-limb explosive power. The unit of measurement was centimeters (cm). The outcome was analyzed as the change in centimeters from baseline to 10 weeks.

  3. Trunk Inclination Angle During Clean Receiving Position

    Time frame: Baseline and 10 weeks post-intervention

    Trunk inclination angle was measured during the lowest stable clean receiving position using video-based kinematic analysis. The angle was measured from the vertical reference line passing through the hip joint. The unit of measurement was degrees (°). The outcome was analyzed as the change in degrees from baseline to 10 weeks. A lower angle indicates a more upright trunk position.

  4. Total Weightlifting Performance

    Time frame: Baseline and 10 weeks post-intervention

    Total weightlifting performance was calculated as the sum of the best successful snatch lift and the best successful clean lift without jerk. The unit of measurement was kilograms (kg). The outcome was analyzed as the change in kilograms from baseline to 10 weeks.

  5. Technical Error Frequency During Snatch and Clean Attempts

    Time frame: Baseline and 10 weeks post-intervention

    Technical-error frequency was calculated from video analysis by counting the total number of observed technical errors during selected snatch and clean attempts. The coded errors included excessive trunk inclination, forward or backward jump during receiving, unstable receiving position, loss of balance during recovery, and visible bar path deviation. The unit of measurement was number of errors. The outcome was analyzed as the change in number of errors from baseline to 10 weeks.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

New Damietta University Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Effects of Flywheel Inertial Training on Lower-Limb Power, Trunk Stability, and Olympic Weightlifting Performance in Youth Athletes

Acronym: FLY-WL

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Jun 3, 2026
Registry last updated
Jun 3, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.