fluticasone furoate, fexofenadine
DrugOther names: fluticasone furoate, fexofenadine
NCT Number: NCT00502775
The primary objective of the study is to compare nighttime symptom relief of fluticasone furoate nasal spray versus oral fexofenadine
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me12 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
GSK Investigational Site, Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Other names: fluticasone furoate, fexofenadine
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1-2
Questions include: 1. Nasal congestion on awakening (Score: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe); 2. Difficulty going to sleep (Score: 0=not at all, 1=little, 2=moderately, 3=very); 3. Nighttime awakenings (Score: 0=not at all, 1=once, 2=more than once, 3=felt like awake all night). The sum of the ratings for the three items comprises the NSS.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1-2
Subjects assessed four nasal symptoms (rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, nasal itching, and sneezing). The sum of the four nasal symptoms comprised the total nasal symptom score (TNSS). Reflective rating represented symptoms over preceding 12 hours. Scores: 0=symptoms not present, 1=mild severity, 2=moderate severity, 3=severe.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1-2
Subjects assessed four nasal symptoms (rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, nasal itching, and sneezing). The sum of the four nasal symptoms comprised the total nasal symptom score (TNSS). Reflective rating represented symptoms over preceding 12 hours. Scores: 0=symptoms not present, 1=mild severity, 2=moderate severity, 3=severe.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1-2
Subjects assessed four nasal symptoms (rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, nasal itching, and sneezing). The sum of the four nasal symptoms comprised the total nasal symptom score (TNSS).Reflective rating represented symptoms over preceding 12 hours. Scores: 0=symptoms not present, 1=mild severity, 2=moderate severity, 3=severe.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1-2
Subjects assessed three ocular symptoms (itching/ burning eyes, tearing/watering eyes, and eye redness). The sum of the 3 ocular symptoms comprised the total ocular symptom score (TOSS). Reflective rating represented symptoms over preceding 12 hours. Scores: 0=symptoms not present, 1=mild severity, 2=moderate severity, 3=severe.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1-2
Subjects assessed three ocular symptoms (itching/ burning eyes, tearing/watering eyes, and eye redness). The sum of the 3 ocular symptoms comprised the total ocular symptom score (TOSS). Reflective rating represented symptoms over preceding 12 hours. Scores: 0=symptoms not present, 1=mild severity, 2=moderate severity, 3=severe.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1-2
Subjects assessed three ocular symptoms (itching/ burning eyes, tearing/watering eyes, and eye redness). The sum of the 3 ocular symptoms comprised the total ocular symptom score (TOSS). Reflective rating represented symptoms over preceding 12 hours. Scores: 0=symptoms not present, 1=mild severity, 2=moderate severity, 3=severe.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1-2
Subjects assessed four nasal symptoms (rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, nasal itching, and sneezing). The sum of the four nasal symptoms comprised the total nasal symptom score (TNSS).Instantaneous rating represented symptoms at the time of the assessment. Scores: 0=symptoms not present, 1=mild severity, 2=moderate severity, 3=severe.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1-2
Subjects assessed three ocular symptoms (itching/ burning eyes, tearing/watering eyes, and eye redness). The sum of the four ocular symptoms comprised the total nasal symptom score (TOSS).Instantaneous rating represented symptoms at the time of the assessment. Scores: 0=symptoms not present, 1=mild severity, 2=moderate severity, 3=severe.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1-2
Subjects used a portable hand-held inspiratory flow meter to measure and record PNIF in the morning prior to taking the study medication. Three measurements were taken and the highest measurement was recorded in the electronic diary. A positive change signifies improved nasal air flow.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1-2
Subjects used a portable hand-held inspiratory flow meter to measure and record PNIF in the evening. Three measurements were taken and the highest measurement was recorded in the electronic diary. A positive change signifies improved nasal air flow.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 15 or if Early Withdrawal Day
Subjects completed the 16-item Nocturnal Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (NRQLQ)to assess nocturnal rhinitis-related quality of life. The NRQLQ measures the functional problems most troublesome to patients with nocturnal allergy symptoms. Each question scored from 0-6 with higher scores indicating more nocturnal impairment.
GlaxoSmithKline
Industry
A Comparison of Fluticasone Furoate Nasal Spray Versus Oral Fexofenadine in the Treatment of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05297760
Allergic Asthma, Allergic Rhinitis
Zurich, Switzerland
View Trial DetailsNCT00406783
Hypersensitivity, Hypersensitivity, Immediate
View Trial DetailsNCT04622917
Allergic Rhinitis, Hay Fever
Lund, Skåne County, Sweden
View Trial DetailsNCT02975479
Hypersensitivity, Hypersensitivity, Immediate
Lund, Sweden
View Trial Details