Health Science University Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kırdar City Hospital
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT06689683
Shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) is a noninvasive method widely used as the first step in treating stone disease. This study aimed to reduce radiation exposure to patients and practitioners during SWL sessions by extending the intervals of fluoroscopy controls. The main questions it aims to answer are:
* Will radiation exposure be reduced? * Will the stone-free status be affected? The researchers will compare the fluoroscopic control intervals of 250 shocks and 500 shocks.
Participants will:
* Take to a maximum of 3 sessions. * Check once a week * Group 1 was fluoroscopically monitored every 250 shocks, and Group 2 was fluoroscopically monitored every 500 shocks
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
SWL works on the principle of focusing on the calculus using ultrasonography or fluoroscopy, transmitting high-energy shock waves from the lithotripter to the calculus and fragmenting it. Fluoroscopic focusing is a commonly used imaging technique that raises concerns about ionizing radiation exposure for patients, technologists, and physicians. Intermittent fluoroscopic monitoring during SWL is widely employed to adjust for patient movement, respiratory movement, and stone displacement within the kidney. However, there is no consensus on the optimal frequency of fluoroscopic monitoring in the literature. This study aims to seek to determine whether increasing the duration between fluoroscopic checks affects the success rate of SWL in achieving stone-free status while reducing radiation exposure to patients.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
SWL works on the principle of focusing on the calculus using fluoroscopy. There has yet to be a consensus on the optimal frequency of fluoroscopic monitoring in the literature.
Time frame: 1 month after the end of treatment
Session intervals were determined as one week, and patients with residues visible on the KUB radiography before the session were included in the new session. At the end of the treatment, direct radiography and ultrasound of the urinary system was performed at the end of the first month. Patients with stones larger than 4 mm were considered to have had an unsuccessful treatment.
Time frame: From registration until the 1st month after the end of treatment.
The total fluoroscopy time (seconds) during treatment will be calculated.
Time frame: From registration until the 1st month after the end of treatment.
Complications occurring from the beginning of treatment to the end of treatment, such as additional intervention, pyelonephritis, steinstrausse.
Lütfi Kırdar City Hospital
Other
Comparison of Two Different Fluoroscopy Activation Intervals in Shock Wave Lithotripsy: a Prospective Randomised Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05269108
Calculi, Female Urogenital Diseases
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT05088213
Calculi, Female Urogenital Diseases
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
View Trial DetailsNCT03855787
Calculi, Female Urogenital Diseases
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05701098
Calculi, Female Urogenital Diseases
San Diego, California, United States
View Trial Details