Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05235295

Fluoroscopic vs Ultrasound Guided Sacroiliac (SI) Joint Injection

The investigators aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of intra-articular sacroiliac joint injection under fluoroscopy versus ultrasound guidance

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training and Research Hospital

Ankara, 06110, Turkey (Türkiye)

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Low back and/or gluteal pain without radicular extension for more than 3 months
  • Tenderness over the SI joint
  • Pain score > 3 by Visual Analogue Scale

Exclusion criteria

  • Malignancy
  • Generalized or local infection
  • Coagulopathy
  • Allergy to drugs to be injected

Treatment and study plan

Ultrasound-guided sacroiliac joint injection

Procedure

Using ultrasound the sacral hiatus in transverse position was identified. Then, sliding laterally and cephalad in transverse position, the posterior superior iliac spine and the posterior sacroiliac joint were identified. The needle was advanced toward the posterior joint space from medial to lateral, using an in-plane technique.

Flouroscopy-guided sacroiliac joint injection

Procedure

Using anterior posterior and contralateral oblique view the posterior joint line and inferior joint margin were identified and a needle was advanced at the point the posterior inferior joint line was most clearly seen.

Primary outcomes

  1. Reduction in pain

    Time frame: Change from baseline pain score at 3 months

    Pain assessment will be performed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score (0 = no pain, 10 = the most severe pain felt).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)

    Time frame: Baseline to 3 months post-procedure

    Mean Change from Baseline in functional disability scores based on Oswestry Disability Index. 0% to 20% indicate minimal disability, 21% to 40% indicate moderate disability, 41%-60% indicates severe disability, 61%-80% means crippled and 81%-100% indicates that the patient is either bed-bound or exaggerating his/her symptoms.

  2. Patient satisfaction Questionnaire

    Time frame: baseline to 3 months post-procedure

    Satisfaction was measured on a 1 to 5 scale,Using score: 5-Excellent, 4-Very Good, 3-Good, 2-Fair, and 1-Poor

  3. Quantitative analgesic questionnaire

    Time frame: at 3 months post-procedure

    A tool designed to record patient-reported pain medication use, create scores to quantify and compare it and track changes in analgesic drug use over time. A higher score indicates higher pain medication use

  4. Procedure time

    Time frame: Intraoperative

    Procedure time was measured using a stopwatch. It was defined as the time from the start of the procedure, the initial image was obtained or first probe placement, until the end of the procedure defined as;transforaminal needle placement was seen clearly.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Feb 11, 2022
Registry last updated
Nov 1, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.