Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05497726

Fluorescent Sentinel Lymph Node Identification in Colon Carcinoma Using Intravenous Bevacizumab-800CW

This prospective study aims to assess the safety and feasibility of lymph node identification using bevacizumab-800CW in patients with cT1-3N0-2 tumours, using intravenous administration.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Meander Medisch Centrum

Amersfoort, Utrecht, 3813TZ, Netherlands

About this study

The current gold standard for the treatment of colon carcinoma consists of the surgical en-bloc resection of the colonic segment including the adjacent mesocolon containing the draining lymph nodes. Analysis of these lymph nodes is important, since lymph node status is one of the most important prognostic factors determining the use of adjuvant chemotherapy. Although patients with tumour stage I and II do not have lymph node metastases, 15-20% develop recurrent disease. Several studies suggest that ultrastaging techniques such as immunohistochemistry (IHC) or reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) using multilevel slicing results in upstaging of 14-18% of patients, due to newly found (micro)metastasis. Furthermore, several studies indicate that these micrometastases are correlated with a significantly poorer prognosis, subsequently suggesting that this subgroup of patients might benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy. Therefore, the most recent Dutch guidelines advice the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in this "upstaged" group, although evidence is still lacking.

However, ultrastaging techniques are labour-intensive and costly, and therefore not suitable for analyses of all lymph nodes that have been collected during segmental colectomy. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) identification in colon carcinoma has been proposed to overcome this problem by identifying the first order draining lymph node(s) of the tumour, which have the highest chance of containing metastatic tumour cells. Several studies aimed at SLN identification in colon carcinoma have been published, however, early studies using radio-guided or blue-dye guided SLN identification, showed relatively high rates of false negatives with consequent low sensitivity rates. Since mesocolon is rather fatty tissue, visualization of conventional dyes is difficult. Indocyanine green (ICG), which can be visualized using near infrared (NIR), has been put forward since it is known to penetrate relatively deep into living tissue.

Nevertheless, results of SLN identification using ICG remain unsatisfying with high false-negative rates and low sensitivity. Most likely this is due to the fact that these studies also included large cT3-cT4 tumours and patients with massive lymph node involvement. Which are factors known to interfere with lymph drainage patterns. Furthermore, subserosal injections were frequently used, while it is suggested that submucosal injections might result in better sensitivity of the procedure. In the FLUOR-SLN-ICG pilot study, we successfully conducted SLN identification in patients with ICG.

Recently, more research is conducted in tumour-targeted tracers as they have many advantages compared to ICG. For example, tumour-targeted tracers can be preoperatively administered which aid logistics, binds to tumour and metastases, thus allowing more time for uptake in patients with larger tumours and lymph node metastases. These properties may result in increased accuracy and would be more broadly applicable compared to ICG. Furthermore, tumour-targeted tracers can also be administrated intravenously and potentially identify lymph node metastases without having to perform a colonoscopy. However, administration via colonoscopy of tumour-targeted tracers for the detection of lymph node metastases in colon carcinoma has not been performed yet, and intravenous administration would be a step after administration via colonoscopy.

Therefore this prospective study aims to assess the safety and feasibility of lymph node identification using bevacizumab-800CW in patients with cT1-3N0-2 tumours, using intravenous administration.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Oral and written informed consent (IC)
  • Aged 18 years and older
  • Patients with pathologically confirmed and/or suspected cT1-3N0-2M0 colon carcinoma.

Exclusion criteria

  • Distant metastasis
  • Suspicion of cT4 disease based on pre-operative assessment
  • Metastatic or T4 disease discovered during intraoperative staging
  • Pregnancy, lactation or a planned pregnancy during the course of the study
  • Previous colon surgery, excluding appendectomy.
  • Contra-indication for laparoscopic/robotic surgery
  • Inadequately controlled hypertension with or without current antihypertensive medication.
  • Within 6 months prior to inclusion: myocardial infarction, TIA, CVA, pulmonary embolism, unstable angina pectoris, or uncontrolled chronic hepatic failure.
  • Regarding Bevacizumab: Hypersensitivity to Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cell products or other recombinant human or humanised antibodies. Or an allergy for it's components (Trehalose dehydrate, sodium phosphate, polysorbate 20, water for injections)

Treatment and study plan

Sentinel lymph node detection using intravenous bevacizumab-800CW

Procedure

Sentinel lymph node detection using intravenous bevacizumab-800CW

Primary outcomes

  1. Feasibility of SLN(s) or lymph node metastases with intravenous bevacizumab-800CW

    Time frame: During surgery

    Defined as the number of patients in which a SLN or lymph node metastases were detected due to fluorescence during surgery and/or pathology assessment divided by the total number of procedures. If no lymph node metastases are present in the five patients, the study could still be a success since lymph nodes may contain fluorescence which is often in lower quantities than in lymph nodes containing metastases.

    We conclude that the study is a feasible if:

    • We are to detect fluorescence in lymph nodes in 3 out of 5 patients (regardless of the presence of metastases)
    • And/or we are able to detect lymph node metastases with fluorescence, or if fluorescence is higher in lymph node metastases compared to tumour-negative lymph nodes.
  2. Safety of SLN(s) or lymph node metastases with intravenous bevacizumab-800CW

    Time frame: Measured till 90 days after surgery

    The rate of adverse events related to bevacizumab-800CW (injection) will be measured. This is defined as the number of adverse events related towards bevacizumab-800CW/total number of procedures.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Amount of fluorescence in lymph node metastases compared to lymph node without metastases

    Time frame: 3 months (After examination by the Oddysey flatbed scanner)

    Examination of fluorescence by the Oddysey flatbed scanner

  2. False-negative SLNs

    Time frame: 3 months (after pathological examination)

    The SLNs are negative whereas the non-sentinel nodes (NSNs) were positive (number).

  3. True-negative SLNs

    Time frame: 3 months (after pathological examination)

    Both the SLNs and NSNs are negative (number).

  4. Sensitivity

    Time frame: 3 months (after pathological examination)

    The number of patients with a positive SLN / the total number of node positive patients (n, %).

  5. Upstaging

    Time frame: 3 months (after pathological examination)

    The number of patients with SLNs positive for micro- or macrometastases by serial slicing and IHC / the number of patients who were node negative by H&E examination (n, %).

  6. Aberrant lymph node status

    Time frame: 3 months (after pathological examination)

    The number of patients with aberrant lymph nodes, and the status of these lymph nodes considering micro- or macrometastases.

  7. Accuracy

    Time frame: 3 months (after pathological examination)

    (The total number of patients with a positive SLN + the number of patients with a true-negative SLN) / number of patients with an identified SLN (n, %).

  8. Negative predictive value (NPV)

    Time frame: 3 months (after pathological examination)

    The number of true negative SLNs / (true negative + false negative SLNs).

  9. Number of SLN identified

    Time frame: 3 months (after pathological examination)

    Number of SLN identified (number).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Meander Medical Center

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Pilot Study to Assess the Safety and Feasibility of Fluorescent Sentinel Lymph Node Identification in Colon Carcinoma Using Intravenous Bevacizumab-800CW.

Acronym: IBIZA-2

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Aug 11, 2022
Registry last updated
Nov 7, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.