Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04114162

Fluid Overload Quantification in Septic Shock

Fluid management in septic shock patients remain a great challenge. Insufficient fluid filling lead to hypovolemia, organ failure and increased death, whereas fluid overload was associated to an increased morbidity and mortality in several studies.

Several invasive and non invasive strategies have been developed during the past years to monitor the hemodynamic state of septic shock patients, but no method has been validated to objectively quantify fluid overload in septic shock patients.

The Body Composition Monitor (BCM) allow for measurement of total body water (TBW), extracellular water (ECW) and intracellular water (ICW) volumes using bioimpedancemetry. The BCW is daily used in patients who undergo renal dialysis to assess the effectiveness of fluid removal. The BCM has never been validated in septic shock patients.

The aim of the study is to investigate the accuracy of the BCM to measure the variation of the TBW during a fluid challenge of 500 ml of saline during the early phase of septic shock.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon

Besançon, 25030, France

About this study

Patients suffering from septic shock admitted in our critical care unit for less than 24 hours will be eligible. TBW, ECW and ICW volumes will be measured using the BCM just before (T0), just at the end (T1) and 1 h after the end (T2) of a fluid challenge of 500 ml of saline. Fluid responsiveness will be assessed using trans thoracic echocardiography (TTE). TTE will be performed at T0, T1 and T2. Blood samples will be obtained at T0, T1 and T2 to dose biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction and of capillary leak. The effectiveness of fluid challenge on microcirculation will be investigated by measuring the tissue perfusion index of the urethral mucosa using the IKORUS UP device.

Patients will be followed until Day 28 after admission in the critical care unit.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient aged from 18 to 80 years old
  • Admitted to ICU for septic shock for less than 24 h
  • Fluid resuscitation decided by intensivist
  • Patient affiliated to a social security system or recipient of a such system
  • Patient/proxy not opposed to the study

Exclusion criteria

  • Subject with amputation of 1 or more limbs
  • Body mass index > 35 kg.m-2 ou < 18 kg.m-2
  • Impossibility of setting up an arterial catheter for invasive blood pressure monitoring and / or a central venous catheter in the upper cava territory
  • Patient with pacemaker and / or implantable cardioverter defibrillator
  • Quality of cardio echo image insufficient to allow studied parameters measurement
  • Moribund subject ( life expectancy expected less than 48 hours)
  • Uncontrolled intracranial hypertension (intracranial pressure ≥ 20 mm Hg by ICP monitoring or by a pulsatility index ≥ 1.30 in the transcranial Doppler)
  • Patient under ECMO/ECLS
  • Legal incapacity or limited legal capacity
  • Subject without health insurance
  • Pregnant woman
  • Subject being in the exclusion period of another study or provided for by the "National Volunteer File"

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. To assess the accuracy of the BCM to measure the variation of the TBW volume during a fluid challenge.

    Time frame: 10 minutes

    The variation of the TBW volume measured by the BCM will be compared to the variation of the volume of fluids (fluid input minus fluid output) during a fluid challenge of 500 ml of saline. Fluid input will be the sum of the volume of all fluids and drugs delivered during the fluid challenge (including enteral nutrition). Fluid output will be the sum of all loss of fluid (surgical drain, urine output) during the fluid challenge.

Secondary outcomes

  1. To describe the variation of the ECW volume measured by the BCM during a fluid challenge of 500 ml of saline.

    Time frame: 10 minutes

    The variation of the ECW volume during a fluid challenge of 500 ml of saline will be the difference between the ECW volume measured à T0 (just before the fluid challenge) and the ECW volume measured at T1 (just after the end of the fluid challenge).

  2. To describe the variation of the ECW volume on TBW volume ratio during a fluid challenge of 500 ml of saline.

    Time frame: 10 minutes

    ECW and TBW volumes will be measured using the BCM just before the fluid challenge (T0) and just after the end of the fluid challenge (T1). The ECW volume on TBW volume ratio (ECW/TBW ratio) will be calculated at T0 and at T1. The variation of the ECW/TBW ration will be the difference between the ECW/TBW ratio measured at T0 and the ECW/TBW ratio measured at T1.

  3. To compare the phase angle value measured at T0 by the BCM between responders and non responders at T1.

    Time frame: 10 minutes

    Fluid responsiveness at T1 will be defined by an increased of the stroke volume > 10% between T0 and T1. Stroke volume will be measured using trans thoracic echocardiography. The phase angle value at T0 will be compared between responders (patients with an increase of the stroke volume > 10%) and non responders.

  4. To describe the relationship between the phase angle value measured at T0 by the BCM and the capillary leak index.

    Time frame: 10 minutes

    The capillary leak index is defined by the following ratio: (blood C-reactive protein*100)/(blood albumin).

  5. To compare the ECW/TBW ratio at T0 between responders and non responders at T1.

    Time frame: 10 minutes

  6. To compare the TBW volume at T0 between responders and non responders at T2.

    Time frame: 70 minutes

    Fluid responsiveness will be assessed at T2 (1 h after the end of the fluid challenge) using transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). Fluid responsiveness at T2 will be defined by an increased of the stroke volume > 10% compared to baseline (T0).

  7. To compare the ECW/TBW ratio at T0 between responders and non responders at T2.

    Time frame: 70 minutes

    Fluid responsiveness will be assessed at T2 (1 h after the end of the fluid challenge) using transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). Fluid responsiveness at T2 will be defined by an increased of the stroke volume > 10% compared to baseline (T0).

  8. To compare the ECW/TBW ratio at T2 between responders and non responders at T2.

    Time frame: 70 minutes

    Fluid responsiveness will be assessed at T2 (1 h after the end of the fluid challenge) using transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). Fluid responsiveness at T2 will be defined by an increased of the stroke volume > 10% compared to baseline (T0). ECW/TBW ratio will be calculated at T2 from the ECW and TBW volumes measured using the BCM at T2 (1 h after the end of fluid challenge).

  9. To describe the variation of the tissue perfusion index of the urethral mucosa (uPI) measured using the IKORUS UP device during the fluid challenge of 500 ml of saline.

    Time frame: 70 minutes

    The uPI will be continuously measured during the fluid challenge and until 1 hours after the end of the fluid challenge. The uPI will be measured using the IKORUS UP device.

  10. To describe the relationship between blood biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction and fluid responsiveness.

    Time frame: 70 min

    Blood biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction will be measured from blood samples obtained at T0, T1 and T2. Fluid responsiveness will be assessed using TTE. Fluid responsiveness will be defined by an increased of the stroke volume > 10% compared to baseline (T0).

  11. To describe the relationship between blood biomarkers of capillary leak and fluid responsiveness.

    Time frame: 70 minutes

    Blood biomarkers of capillary leak will be measured from blood samples obtained at T0, T1 and T2. Fluid responsiveness will be assessed using TTE. Fluid responsiveness will be defined by an increased of the stroke volume > 10% compared to baseline (T0).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon

Other

Collaborators

  • Don du Souffle de Besançon
  • Hopital Lariboisière

Registry information

Official study title

Body Composition Monitor to Quantify Fluid Overload Related to Vascular Leak in Septic Shock Patients

Acronym: FOTOShock

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Oct 3, 2019
Registry last updated
Apr 23, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.