University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center
Sacramento, California, 95817, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Mehrdad Abedi
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Office of Clinical Research
CONTACT
NCT Number: NCT05052528
This phase I trial evaluates the best dose, possible benefits and/or side effects of fludarabine and cyclophosphamide with or without rituximab before CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells in treating patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma that has come back (relapsed) or has not responded to previous treatment (refractory). T-cells are a normal part of the immune system. To make the T-cell medication, T-cells are taken from the blood and altered in a laboratory. They are then returned to the body. The altered T-cells will latch on to a specific part of the cancer cells and hopefully kill them. Once the T-cells have been altered in the laboratory, they are called "CAR T-cells." CAR is short for "chimeric antigen receptors." These are structures on the surface of cells that allow the altered T-Cells to find and destroy the cancer cells. Another part of the T-Cell medication is called "CD19." This part is called a "biomarker." Biomarkers help doctors determine whether a cancer is getting worse and whether medications are working to stop it. The chemotherapy drugs that are given before the T-Cell therapy are cyclophosphamide, fludarabine and rituximab. Rituximab is an immunotherapy drug. These chemotherapy drugs will reduce the number of normal (unaltered) T-Cells in the body to make room for the altered T-cells to kill the cancer cells. Giving fludarabine and cyclophosphamide with or without rituximab before CD19 CAR T cell therapy may help improve response to CD19 CAR T cell therapy in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1
Sacramento, California, 95817, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Mehrdad Abedi
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Office of Clinical Research
CONTACT
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:I. To examine the feasibility to manufacture autologous CD19 CAR T cells at a minimum target dose of 1.0 x 10^6 cells/kilogram using the CliniMACS automated system.II. To determine the safety of administering high-dose conditioning chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide and fludarabine with rituximab prior to CD19 CAR-T cell therapy in patients with relapsed (R)/refractory (R) diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and to find the recommended regimen after phase II dose for this therapy.III. To determine the safety of infusion of chimeric antigen receptor T cells targeting CD19 in adults with R/R DLBCL.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:I. To describe the toxicities related to CD19 targeted CAR T cells.II. To describe the overall response rate (ORR) and complete response (CR) rate of relapsed DLBCL treated with CD19 CAR T cells.III. To assess other response variables including overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and event free survival (EFS).
OUTLINE: This is a dose-escalation study. Patients are assigned to 1 of 6 dose levels.
DOSE LEVEL 1: Patients receive fludarabine phosphate intravenously (IV) over 30 minutes daily and cyclophosphamide IV over 60 minutes daily on days -5 to -3. Patients also receive CD19 CAR T cells IV on day 0.
DOSE LEVEL 2: Patients receive rituximab IV on day -5, fludarabine phosphate IV over 30 minutes daily on days -5 to -3, and cyclophosphamide IV over 60 minutes on days -5 to -3. Patients also receive CD19 CAR T cells IV on day 0.
DOSE LEVEL 3: Patients receive fludarabine phosphate IV over 30 minutes daily on days -3 to -5 and cyclophosphamide IV over 60 minutes daily on day -5. Patients also receive CD19 CAR T cells IV on day 0.DOSE LEVEL 4: Patients receive rituximab IV on day -5, fludarabine phosphate IV over 30 minutes daily on days -5 to -3, and cyclophosphamide IV over 60 minutes on day -5. Patients also receive CD19 CAR T cells IV on day 0.
DOSE LEVEL 5: Patients receive fludarabine phosphate IV over 30 minutes daily on days -5 to -1 and cyclophosphamide IV over 60 minutes daily on days -5 and -4. Patients also receive CD19 CAR T cells IV on day 0.
DOSE LEVEL 6: Patients receive rituximab IV on day -5, fludarabine phosphate IV over 30 minutes daily on days -5 to -1, and cyclophosphamide IV over 60 minutes on days -5 and -4. Patients also receive CD19 CAR T cells IV on day 0.After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 30, 60, and 90 days, 6 and 12 months, and then annually for up to 15 years.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Given CD19 CAR T cells IV
Other names: CAR T Infusion, CAR T Therapy, CAR T-cell Therapy, Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Infusion
Given IV
Other names: (-)-Cyclophosphamide, 2H-1,3,2-Oxazaphosphorine, 2-[bis(2-chloroethyl)amino]tetrahydro-, 2-oxide, monohydrate, Carloxan, Ciclofosfamida, Ciclofosfamide, Cicloxal, Clafen, Claphene, CP monohydrate, CTX, CYCLO-cell, Cycloblastin, Cycloblastine, Cyclophospham, Cyclophosphamid monohydrate, Cyclophosphamide Monohydrate, Cyclophosphamidum, Cyclophosphan, Cyclophosphane, Cyclophosphanum, Cyclostin, Cyclostine, Cytophosphan, Cytophosphane, Cytoxan, Fosfaseron, Genoxal, Genuxal, Ledoxina, Mitoxan, Neosar, Revimmune, Syklofosfamid, WR- 138719
Given IV
Other names: 2-F-ara-AMP, 9H-Purin-6-amine, 2-fluoro-9-(5-O-phosphono-.beta.-D-arabinofuranosyl)-, Beneflur, Fludara, SH T 586
Given IV
Other names: ABP 798, BI 695500, C2B8 Monoclonal Antibody, Chimeric Anti-CD20 Antibody, CT-P10, IDEC-102, IDEC-C2B8, IDEC-C2B8 Monoclonal Antibody, MabThera, Monoclonal Antibody IDEC-C2B8, PF-05280586, Rituxan, Rituximab ABBS, Rituximab Biosimilar ABP 798, Rituximab Biosimilar BI 695500, Rituximab Biosimilar CT-P10, Rituximab Biosimilar GB241, Rituximab Biosimilar IBI301, Rituximab Biosimilar JHL1101, Rituximab Biosimilar PF-05280586, Rituximab Biosimilar RTXM83, Rituximab Biosimilar SAIT101, Rituximab Biosimilar SIBP-02, rituximab biosimilar TQB2303, rituximab-abbs, RTXM83, Truxima
Time frame: Up to 15 years
Time frame: 2 months
Logistic regression will be utilized to assess the effect of patient prognostic factors on the response rate and the toxicity rate. Toxicity data by type and severity will be summarized by frequency tables.
Time frame: 2 months
Logistic regression will be utilized to assess the effect of patient prognostic factors on the response rate and the toxicity rate. Toxicity data by type and severity will be summarized by frequency tables.
Time frame: 2 months
Time frame: 2 months
Logistic regression will be utilized to assess the effect of patient prognostic factors on the response rate and the toxicity rate. Toxicity data by type and severity will be summarized by frequency tables.
Time frame: Up to 15 years
Logistic regression will be utilized to assess the effect of patient prognostic factors on the response rate and the toxicity rate. Toxicity data by type and severity will be summarized by frequency tables.
Time frame: At 3 months after completion of CAR-T therapy
Defined as the percentage of patients that achieve partial response or complete response. Logistic regression will be utilized to assess the effect of patient prognostic factors on the response rate and the toxicity rate.
Time frame: At 3 months after completion of CAR T therapy
Logistic regression will be utilized to assess the effect of patient prognostic factors on the response rate and the toxicity rate.
Time frame: From the start of the conditioning lymphodepletion chemotherapy on day -6 until death, assessed at 1 year
Will be estimated using Kaplan and Meier methods. Comparison of time-to-event endpoints by important subgroups will be made using the log-rank test.
Time frame: From the start of the conditioning lymphodepletion chemotherapy regimen until the documentation of disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first, assessed at 1 year
Will be estimated using Kaplan and Meier methods. Comparison of time-to-event endpoints by important subgroups will be made using the log-rank test.
Time frame: From the date of day -6 of lymphodepleting conditioning therapy to the date of first documented progression, initiation of new anti-lymphoma treatment, or death, assessed at 1 year
Will be estimated using Kaplan and Meier methods. Comparison of time-to-event endpoints by important subgroups will be made using the log-rank test.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
University of California, Davis
Other
A Phase I Study to Evaluate the Safety of Escalating Doses of Lymphodepleting Conditioning Chemotherapy Prior to CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells in Subjects With Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07098364
Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases, Immune System Diseases
Seattle, Washington, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06649812
Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases, High Grade B-Cell Lymphoma With MYC and BCL6 Rearrangements
Tucson, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05672251
Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases, Immune System Diseases
Duarte, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05077527
AIDS-Related Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma, AIDS-Related Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
Duarte, California, United States
View Trial Details