Fluconazole
DrugOther names: Antifungal
NCT Number: NCT02145832
This study is designed to determine whether micafungin is as efficacious as the current standard of fluconazole, to compare the safety of the two drugs in the treatment of proven neonatal candidiasis.
It is also designed to further elucidate the pharmacokinetics of the two products in the growing and developing neonate and premature infant.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me24 week–42 week
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Antwerp, Rocourt, Liège, Louvain, Namur, Belgium
The epidemiology of candidiasis is rapidly changing; recent estimates are that nearly 50% of Candida bloodstream isolates are non-albicans Candida species requiring the use of treatments active against them.
Because of the high risk associated with candida infection in premature babies and fluconazole prophylaxis is now recommended in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs) with a high incidence in fungal infections. As candida infection is difficult to prove and requires an urgent treatment, in particular to avoid central nervous system (CNS) infection, treatment is often started in high risk patients when the infection is only suspected, i.e. on clinical arguments without waiting for positive cultures (10% of cases).
Fluconazole has not been approved for use in the treatment of neonatal candidiasis. In contrast, the efficacy of echinocandins for the treatment of invasive candidiasis has been suggested by pre-clinical and clinical studies.
Related to Micafungin, the available data suggest that only dosages that are greater than what currently recommended in infants (2 to 4 mg/kg/day) may ensure adequate coverage of the CNS, given that ability of low dosages of micafungin to penetrate the cerebrospinal compartment and to diffuse in the cerebrospinal fluid is deemed suboptimal.
The doses that will be administered are higher that currently used in order to optimize efficacy, and the concept of a loading dose that will be used for both drugs in this project, is present in antifungal treatment strategies for adults, but it has never been applied to infants and preterm neonates.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Other names: Antifungal
Other names: Antifungal
Time frame: One year
AUC/MIC ratio in the two treated groups (both fluconazole and micafungin) is used as primary outcome. The theoretical "Minimum Inhibitory Concentration required to inhibit the growth of 90% of organisms" (MIC90s) against the common pathogens responsible for the infection to be treated will be used by opposition with the "real MIC90" of the agent really involved that is rarely isolated.
Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France
Other Gov
Fluconazole Versus Micafungin in Neonates With Suspected or Culture-proven Candidiasis: a Randomized Pharmacokinetic and Safety Study (TINN Project - Treat Infections iN Neonates)
Acronym: TINN
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01322698
Bacterial Infections and Mycoses, Candidiasis
Nîmes, Gard, France
View Trial DetailsNCT05707156
Aspergillosis, Bacterial Infections and Mycoses
Denver, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05235711
Bacterial Infections and Mycoses, Candidiasis
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05044156
Bacterial Infections and Mycoses, Candidiasis
Uşak, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details