Fluad®
BiologicalAdvisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) Recommended Vaccine
Other names: Adjuvanted influenza vaccine
NCT Number: NCT03183908
The overall aim of the study is to compare safety and immunogenicity of inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV), adjuvanted (FLUAD®) versus High-Dose inactivated influenza (Fluzone® High-Dose) vaccine in persons ≥65 years (20% aged ≥80 years). A prospective, randomized, blinded clinical trial that will be conducted during the 2017/2018 and 2018/2019 influenza seasons. During each season, approximately 220 older adults will be enrolled at Duke University Medical Center and 140 older adults at Boston University Medical Center. Eligible subjects will be randomized to receive either adjuvanted influenza vaccine or High-Dose influenza vaccine. All subjects will receive vaccine and provide a blood draw at Visit 1, and then return for a second blood draw without vaccination about 4 weeks later to assess for influenza antibody titers. A subset of 100 subjects at Duke will provide a third blood draw 6 months post-vaccination to assess for waning of influenza antibody titers. Subjects will record the occurrence of local and systemic reactions (including fever, pain, tenderness, swelling, redness, general systemic systems), unsolicited adverse events, medical care utilization, and changes in medications over 8 days following vaccination. In addition, serious adverse events and events of clinical interest will be assessed through 42 days post-vaccination. Health-related quality of life will be assessed pre-vaccination (Day 1) and on Days 3 and 9 post-vaccination.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me65 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Full Analysis Population 1: Defined as all subjects who are randomized, vaccinated, and provide at least one day of complete data on the symptom diary.
Full Analysis Population 2: Defined as all subjects who are randomized and vaccinated.
Immunogenicity Population: Defined as subjects who received vaccine, provided baseline and Visit 4 blood draws of acceptable volume and quality within the protocol-defined time frame with no protocol violations affecting immunogenicity.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Note: Year 1 study participants will only be enrolled in Year 2 if they are participating in the sub-study on repeat vaccination
*Participants with a history of malignancy may be included if, after previous treatment by surgical excision, chemotherapy or radiation therapy, the participant has been observed for a period that in the investigator's estimation provides a reasonable assurance of sustained cure (not less than 12 months)
*Formaldehyde, Octylphenol ethoxylate, neomycin, kanamycin, barium, cetyltrimethlyammonium bromide (CTAB)
Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) Recommended Vaccine
Other names: Adjuvanted influenza vaccine
Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) Recommended Vaccine
Other names: High-dose influenza vaccine
Time frame: Days 1 through 8 post-vaccination
Comparison of the proportion of subjects reporting moderate/severe injection site pain within the first week post-vaccination in both treatment groups.
Time frame: 42 days post-vaccination and compared between the two groups.
The frequency and descriptions of adverse events of clinical interest observed in the two treatment groups.
Time frame: 42 days post-vaccination and compared between the two groups.
The frequency and descriptions of serious adverse events observed in the two treatment groups.
No analytical analysis was completed.
Time frame: 29 days post-vaccination
H3N2 hemagglutination inhibition assay (HAI) seroconversion: The proportion of subjects achieving H3N2 seroconversion at day 29 (an HAI titer > 1:40 at day 29 if the baseline titer is < 1:10 or a four-fold rise in HAI titer if the baseline titer is > 1:10) in the respective season's vaccine
Time frame: Days 1 through 8 post-vaccination
Comparison of local reactions within the first week post-vaccination in both treatment groups.
Time frame: Days 1 through 8 post-vaccination
Comparison of local reactions within the first week post-vaccination in both treatment groups by age group.
Time frame: Days 1 through 8 post-vaccination
Comparison of local reactions within the first week post-vaccination in both treatment groups by age group.
Time frame: Days 1 through 8 post-vaccination
Comparison of systemic reactions within the first week post-vaccination in both treatment groups.
Time frame: Days 1 through 8 post-vaccination
Comparison of systemic reactions within the first week post-vaccination in both treatment groups by age group.
Time frame: Days 1 through 8 post-vaccination
Comparison of systemic reactions within the first week post-vaccination in both treatment groups by age group.
Time frame: Pre-vaccination (Day 1), 2 days post-vaccination (Day 3)
Change in scores on the Late Life Function & Disability Instrument pre-vaccination to post-vaccination (Day 1 - Day 3) compared between the vaccination groups (Year 1 only). Response choices are ranked 1-5, High Scores indicate better outcomes.
The Function/Activity Scale measured the amount of difficulty in completing a range of activities, or the amount of help required in doing an activity due to physical or mental heath. : None (5); A little (4) ; Some (3), Quite a lot (2), and Cannot Do (1).
The Disability/Participation Scale measured participation levels in social, family, and community activities due to physical or mental health. Each question has two parts. For the first part of the question, response choices include: Very often (5), Often (4), Once in a while (3), Almost never (2), Never (1). For the second part of the question, response choices include: Not at all (5), A little (4), Somewhat (3), A lot (2), and Completely (1).
Time frame: Pre-vaccination (Day 1), 2 days post-vaccination (Day 3)
Change in scores on the Late Life Function & Disability Instrument pre-vaccination to post-vaccination (Day 1 - Day 3) compared between the vaccination groups (Year 1 only). Response choices are ranked 1-5, High Scores indicate better outcomes.
The Function/Activity Scale measured the amount of difficulty in completing a range of activities, or the amount of help required in doing an activity due to physical or mental heath. : None (5); A little (4) ; Some (3), Quite a lot (2), and Cannot Do (1).
The Disability/Participation Scale measured participation levels in social, family, and community activities due to physical or mental health. Each question has two parts. For the first part of the question, response choices include: Very often (5), Often (4), Once in a while (3), Almost never (2), Never (1). For the second part of the question, response choices include: Not at all (5), A little (4), Somewhat (3), A lot (2), and Completely (1).
Time frame: Pre-vaccination (Day 1), 2 days post-vaccination (Day 3)
Change in scores on the Late Life Function & Disability Instrument pre-vaccination to post-vaccination (Day 1 - Day 3) compared between the vaccination groups (Year 1 only). Response choices are ranked 1-5, High Scores indicate better outcomes.
The Function/Activity Scale measured the amount of difficulty in completing a range of activities, or the amount of help required in doing an activity due to physical or mental heath. : None (5); A little (4) ; Some (3), Quite a lot (2), and Cannot Do (1).
The Disability/Participation Scale measured participation levels in social, family, and community activities due to physical or mental health. Each question has two parts. For the first part of the question, response choices include: Very often (5), Often (4), Once in a while (3), Almost never (2), Never (1). For the second part of the question, response choices include: Not at all (5), A little (4), Somewhat (3), A lot (2), and Completely (1).
Time frame: Pre-vaccination (Day 1), 2 days post-vaccination (Day 3)
Change in scores on the EuroQOL 5 dimensions-5 level (EQ-5D-5L) pre-vaccination and post-vaccination compared between the vaccination groups (Year 1 only).
Responses on the EQ-5D-5L measure is converted to a Utility Index that ranges from -0.109 (worst health) to 1.000 (best health).
Time frame: Pre-vaccination (Day 1), 2 days post-vaccination (Day 3)
Change in scores on the EuroQOL 5 dimensions-5 level (EQ-5D-5L) pre-vaccination and post-vaccination compared between the vaccination groups and age group (Year 1 only).
Responses on the EQ-5D-5L measure is converted to a Utility Index that ranges from -0.109 (worst health) to 1.000 (best health).
Time frame: Pre-vaccination (Day 1), 2 days post-vaccination (Day 3)
Change in scores on the EuroQOL 5 dimensions-5 level (EQ-5D-5L) pre-vaccination and post-vaccination compared between the vaccination groups and age group (Year 1 only)
Responses on the EQ-5D-5L measure is converted to a Utility Index that ranges from -0.109 (worst health) to 1.000 (best health).
Time frame: Pre-vaccination (Day 1), 2 days post-vaccination (Day 3)
Change in scores on the EuroQOL visual analogue scale (EQ VAS) pre-vaccination and post-vaccination compared between the vaccination groups (Year 1 only).
The EQ VAS records the respondent's self-rated health on a 20 cm vertical, visual analogue scale with endpoints labelled 'the best health you can imagine' (100) and 'the worst health you can imagine' (0).
Time frame: Pre-vaccination (Day 1), 2 days post-vaccination (Day 3)
Change in scores on the EuroQOL visual analogue scale (EQ VAS) pre-vaccination and post-vaccination compared between the vaccination groups and age group (Year 1 only).
The EQ VAS records the respondent's self-rated health on a 20 cm vertical, visual analogue scale with endpoints labelled 'the best health you can imagine' (100) and 'the worst health you can imagine' (0).
Time frame: Pre-vaccination (Day 1), 2 days post-vaccination (Day 3)
Change in scores on the EuroQOL visual analogue scale (EQ VAS) pre-vaccination and post-vaccination compared between the vaccination groups and age group (Year 1 only).
The EQ VAS records the respondent's self-rated health on a 20 cm vertical, visual analogue scale with endpoints labelled 'the best health you can imagine' (100) and 'the worst health you can imagine' (0).
Time frame: Day 29 (28 days post-vaccination)
The proportion of subjects achieving seroconversion at day 29 (an HAI titer > 1:40 at day 29 if the baseline titer is < 1:10 or a four-fold rise in HAI titer if the baseline titer
Time frame: Day 29 (28 days post-vaccination)
Proportion of subjects with a seroprotective HAI titer (≥ 1:40) pre- and post-immunization at day 29 for each IIV antigen in the respective season's vaccine
Time frame: Day 29 (28 days post-vaccination)
The geometric mean HAI titer (GMT) for each IIV antigen in the respective season's vaccine
Time frame: Day 29 (28 days post-vaccination)
The proportion of subjects aged 65-79 achieving seroconversion at day 29 (an HAI titer > 1:40 at day 29 if the baseline titer is < 1:10 or a four-fold rise in HAI titer if the baseline titer
Time frame: Day 29 (28 days post-vaccination)
The proportion of subjects ages 80 and older achieving seroconversion at day 29 (an HAI titer > 1:40 at day 29 if the baseline titer is < 1:10 or a four-fold rise in HAI titer if the baseline titer
Time frame: Day 29 (28 days post-vaccination)
Proportion of subjects ages 65-79 with a seroprotective HAI titer (≥ 1:40) pre- and post-immunization at day 29 for each IIV antigen in the respective season's vaccine
Time frame: Day 29 (28 days post-vaccination)
Proportion of subjects ages 80 and older with a seroprotective HAI titer (≥ 1:40) pre- and post-immunization at day 29 for each IIV antigen in the respective season's vaccine
Time frame: Day 29 (28 days post-vaccination)
The geometric mean HAI titer (GMT) for each IIV antigen in the respective season's vaccine for ages 65-79
Time frame: Day 29 (28 days post-vaccination)
The geometric mean HAI titer (GMT) for each IIV antigen in the respective season's vaccine for ages 80 and older
Duke University
Other
Safety and Immunogenicity of Adjuvanted Versus High-Dose Inactivated Influenza Vaccines in Older Adults
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05007041
Adverse Drug Event, Chemically-Induced Disorders
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05157191
Adverse Drug Event, Chemically-Induced Disorders
Oakland, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07680062
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Istanbul, Uskudar, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06828315
Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases
Muş, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details