Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT07159035

Flexible Ureteroscopy With a Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for 1-2 cm Lower Pole Kidney Stones

This study, known as the FLAME Trial (Flexible ureteroscopy for Lower pole stones And Mini-pErcutaneous nephrolithotomy), is an international, multicenter, randomized, non-inferiority trial. It aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of flexible ureteroscopy using a flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS) versus mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) in the treatment of 1-2 cm lower pole kidney stones.

A total of 640 eligible adult patients will be enrolled across 20 high-volume urology centers in China, Russia, Turkey, and India. Participants will be randomly assigned to undergo either FANS-assisted flexible ureteroscopy or mini-PCNL. The primary outcome is the immediate stone-free rate (SFR) assessed by non-contrast CT within 72 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes include SFR at 1 month, operative time, pain score, length of hospital stay, complication rates, and changes in health-related quality of life.

The goal of this trial is to determine whether the less invasive FANS-assisted approach is non-inferior to mini-PCNL in terms of efficacy, while potentially offering advantages in postoperative recovery and safety.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University

Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510230, China

About this study

The FLAME Trial (Flexible ureteroscopy for Lower pole stones And Mini-pErcutaneous nephrolithotomy) is an international, multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority study that aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of flexible ureteroscopy assisted by a Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath (FANS) compared with mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) in the treatment of 1-2 cm lower pole renal stones.

This trial will enroll 640 patients from 20 urology centers with substantial experience in endoscopic stone surgery, including hospitals in China, Russia, Turkey, and India. Eligible participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the FANS-assisted flexible ureteroscopy group or the mini-PCNL group. All patients will undergo preoperative imaging, intraoperative standardization, and postoperative follow-up according to the study protocol.

The primary endpoint is the stone-free rate (SFR) within 72 hours postoperatively, evaluated by non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography (NCCT). Secondary endpoints include SFR at 1 month, operative time, length of hospital stay, postoperative pain (measured by VAS score), complication rates (graded by Clavien-Dindo classification), changes in renal function, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

The FANS, developed to improve irrigation control and active stone fragment suction during flexible ureteroscopy, may provide better visualization, reduce intrarenal pressure, and shorten operative time. By directly comparing FANS-assisted fURS with mini-PCNL, the trial seeks to determine whether a less invasive method can achieve comparable outcomes in terms of stone clearance and complication rates.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18-75 years;
  • American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score 1-3;
  • Lower pole renal stones-single or multiple-with a maximal diameter of 1-2 cm confirmed by CT;
  • Ability to provide written informed consent and adhere to trial requirements.

Exclusion criteria

  • Significant urinary tract anatomical anomalies (e.g. horseshoe kidney, ileal conduit);
  • Stones located within a calyceal diverticulum;
  • History of open nephrolithotomy or ureterolithomy (due to resultant intrarenal anatomical distortion);
  • Absolute contraindications to either FANS-f-URS or mini-PCNL, including:
  • Uncorrectable coagulopathy;
  • Active, uncontrolled urinary tract infection;
  • Severe cardiopulmonary disease precluding safe general anesthesia (e.g. decompensated heart failure, refractory COPD);
  • Pregnancy;
  • Inability to tolerate lithotomy or prone positioning;
  • Inability to understand or complete trial documentation.

Treatment and study plan

Flexible ureteroscopy with FANS

Procedure

The FANS with negative-pressure suction, enhancing intrarenal pressure control and fragment evacuation during flexible ureteroscopy.

Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL)

Procedure

Mini-PCNL is performed under general anesthesia with less than 20 Fr access tract, using rigid nephroscopy and stone fragmentation under direct visualization. Postoperative drainage is provided via nephrostomy or ureteral stent as per protocol.

Primary outcomes

  1. Immediate Stone-Free Rate (SFR)

    Time frame: 72 hours after surgery

    Stone-free status will be evaluated using non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography (NCCT) performed within 72 hours after surgery. Stone-free is defined as the absence of residual stone fragments or presence of clinically insignificant fragments ≤2 mm.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Final Stone-Free Rate (SFR) at 1 Month

    Time frame: 1 month after surgery

    Assessed by low-dose CT scan. Patients with no residual stones or with residual fragments ≤2 mm are defined as stone-free.

  2. Operative Time

    Time frame: Intraoperative

    For the FANS-fURS group, operative time is defined as the duration from insertion of the endoscope into the urethra to completion of stent placement.

    For the mini-PCNL group, it is defined as the time from retrograde placement of the ureteric catheter to nephrostomy tube placement or percutaneous access removal.

  3. Postoperative Pain Level

    Time frame: Within 24 hours after surgery.

    Evaluated using the 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates worst pain.

  4. Length of Hospital Stay

    Time frame: From the day of surgery until the day of discharge, assessed up to 30 days postoperatively.

    From surgery to discharge.

  5. Complication Rate Within 1 Month

    Time frame: 1 month after surgery.

    All postoperative complications will be recorded and graded using the Clavien-Dindo classification system.

  6. Change in Quality of Life Score

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 month after surgery.

    Assessed using the Wisconsin Stone Quality of Life (WISQOL) questionnaire before surgery and at 1-month follow-up.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University

Other

Collaborators

  • Ankara University
  • Dehong People's Hospital
  • First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University
  • Fortune Urology Clinic
  • Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital
  • Huadu District People's Hospital of Guangzhou
  • Jiangmen Central Hospital
  • People's Hospital of Nanhai District, Foshan
  • Saint Petersburg State University Hospital
  • Shengjing Hospital
  • The First Affiliated Hospital Hengyang Medical School
  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University
  • The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
  • The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
  • Tianjin Medical University Second Hospital
  • Tongji Hospital
  • Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
  • Yunnan Baoshan Second People's Hospital
  • Zhongda Hospital

Registry information

Official study title

Flexible Ureteroscopy With a Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for 1-2 cm Lower Pole Renal Stones: an International, Multicenter, Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial (FLAME Trial)

Acronym: FLAME

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Sep 8, 2025
Registry last updated
Jul 7, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.