Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02103387

Five Sessions Intervention to Facilitate Adaptation to Breast Cancer

To test the effects of 2 different 5-wk stress management interventions (cognitive behavioral training or relaxation training) vs. a time-matched 5-wk health education condition on psychosocial adaptation and physiological adaptation in women being treated for breast cancer. Participants assigned to either of the stress management conditions will show improved psychosocial adaptation and physiological adaptation compared to those assigned to the health education condition.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

21 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Department of Psychology

Coral Gables, Florida, 33124, United States

About this study

This is a randomized controlled trial comparing the effects of 5-wk group-based stress management interventions (cognitive behavioral therapy [CBT] or relaxation training [RT]) vs a time-matched 5-wk group-based health education (HE) condition on psychosocial adaptation (negative and positive mood, social disruption) and physiological adaptation (cortisol and immune function) in women with non-metastatic breast cancer who are undergoing primary treatment. Participants are recruited in the weeks after surgery and before the start of adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation, are assessed for baseline psychosocial and physiological adaptation indicators, and are then randomly allocated to either CBT, RT or HE. They are re-assessed for psychosocial and physiological adaptation at 6 and 12 month follow-up. Primary hypothesis is that women assigned to CBT or RT will show greater reductions in negative affect and social disruption, and greater increases in positive affect over time compared to women assigned to HE. Secondary hypothesis is that women assigned to CBT or RT will show greater decreases in cortisol and greater increases in immune functioning over time compared to those assigned to HE.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • women diagnosed with breast cancer at stage III or below who had recently undergone lumpectomy or mastectomy

Exclusion criteria

  • prior cancer, prior psychiatric treatment for a serious disorder (e.g., psychosis, suicidality), lack of fluency in English and had begun adjuvant therapy at time of first assessment

Treatment and study plan

cognitive behavioral training

Behavioral

Cognitive Behavioral Training [CBT] (stress awareness, cognitive restructuring, coping skills training, interpersonal skills training)

Relaxation Training

Behavioral

Relaxation Training [RT] (muscle relaxation, deep breathing, guided imagery, meditation)

Health Education Control

Behavioral

Health Education control condition (information about breast cancer diagnosis and treatment, side-effect management, recurrence, physical activity and nutrition, and life after breast cancer)

Primary outcomes

  1. Negative affect as measured by the Affect Balance Scale- Negative Affect subscale

    Time frame: Changes in scores from baseline to 12-month follow-up

    Change from baseline to 12-month follow-up in the Affect Balance Scale- Negative Affect subscale. The Affect Balance Scale includes 40 adjectives assessing negative and positive mood. The Negative Affect subscale (i.e., depression, hostility, guilt, anxiety) will be used. Each emotional state is rated on a Likert Scale (0=never to 5= always) based on the past week and items are averaged, with higher scores indicating more negative affect. Possible scores range from 0-5.

  2. Positive affect as measured by the Affect Balance Scale- Positive Affect subscale

    Time frame: Changes in scores from baseline to 12-month follow-up

    Change from baseline to 12-month follow-up in the Affect Balance Scale- Positive Affect subscale. The Affect Balance Scale includes 40 adjectives assessing negative and positive mood. The Positive Affect subscale (i.e., affection, contentment, vigor, joy) will be used. Each emotional state is rated on a Likert Scale (0=never to 5= always) based on the past week and items are averaged, with higher scores indicating more positive affect. Possible scores range from 0-5.

  3. Social disruption as measure by the Sickness Impact Profile- Social Interaction subscale

    Time frame: Changes in scores from baseline to 12-month follow-up

    Change from baseline to 12-month follow-up in the Sickness Impact Profile- Social Interaction subscale, a 16-item subscale measuring the level of disruption in social activities. Respondents are asked statements regarding social disengagement as they specifically apply to their breast cancer (e.g., "I am doing fewer social activities with groups of people") over the past few weeks, and are asked to respond either No (0) or Yes (1), this applies to me. Scores are summed, with higher scores indicating greater social disruption. Possible scores range from 0-16.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Physiological Adaptation

    Time frame: 12 month follow-up

    Change from baseline to 12 month follow-up in physiological adaptation (decreased serum cortisol, and increased Th1 cytokine production and lower Th2 cytokine production following anti-CD3 stimulation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Miami

Other

Collaborators

  • National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2007
Primary completion
2014
Study completion
2014
First posted
Apr 3, 2014
Registry last updated
Nov 10, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.