Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04670510

Fitness for Brain Optimization for Late-Life Depression

Cognitive impairment and brain abnormalities are common and persist after depression remission in those with Late Life Depression (LLD), compounding dementia risk in both individuals with acute and remitted LLD (rLLD). In this study, investigators will examine systemic neural and cognitive benefits of aerobic exercise training in older adults with remitted LLD. This will generate preliminary data regarding neural targets of aerobic exercise training that may translate to cognitive benefits in those with rLLD, a population who remains at high risk for dementia despite successful treatment of depression.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

60 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

UPMC Western Psychiatric Hospital

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, United States

About this study

Significance:

The population of adults aged >65 years in United States is expected to nearly double between 2012 and 2050, with a projected estimate of 83.7 million adults aged >65 years by 2050. The prevalence of depressive symptoms among older adults ranges 15 - 27% in the community and up to 37% in primary care settings. Though subclinical depressive symptoms are more prevalent than Major Depression (MDD) among older adults (MDD: 5.5% prevalence), rates of MDD in older people have been rising over the past two decades. Late-life depression (LLD) results in enormous economic, public health, and caregiver burden. This high economic cost consists of both direct and indirect costs (e.g., increased use of medical resources, need for unpaid family caregiving). Further, LLD exacerbates chronic medical illness burden and confers the greatest risk for mortality across all mental health conditions in aging. LLD also increases disability risk, with one report estimating 79% of LLD having functional limitations. Importantly, those with LLD are at a twofold increased risk for dementia relative to the general aging population, which has catastrophic implications for the long-term economic and public health burden of LLD.

Background:

Older adults with LLD are particularly predisposed to accelerated rates of cognitive decline and progression to dementia. While nearly half of those with LLD have significant cognitive impairment, cognitive deficits are inadequately addressed using conventional antidepressant treatments. Exercise has emerged as the leading non-pharmacological approach to improve cognition and reduce dementia risk in aging. AE interventions in older adults, over as short as 6-months, have been shown to improve performance in cognitive functions (i.e., executive function) and brain regions and networks (i.e., PFC, HC, DMN) that are most sensitive to the neurotoxic effects of LLD. However, our knowledge of AE-related cognitive and brain changes in aging are primarily drawn from AE trials conducted in populations at low risk for dementia. Though an emerging literature supports the benefits of AE for cognitive and brain health in those with MCI, these studies systemically exclude psychiatric populations. By excluding those with LLD, existing studies are overlooking a subsample of older adults at ultra-high risk for dementia for whom the cognitive and neural benefits of AE training may be particularly consequential. This necessitates a better understanding of the potential of AE training to target systemic brain features and cognition in those who have had LLD.

Impact:

This study will probe whether AE -related systemic brain changes may be mechanistic targets for improving cognition in those with rLLD. It cannot be assumed that AE effects on brain health will be consistent across populations with varying levels of brain-related abnormalities. This study allows for an initial exploration of the extent to which AE effects on cognitive and brain health in those with rLLD are similar to and distinct from AE effects on cognitive and brain health in older adults who 1) are cognitively normal or 2) do not have a history of LLD, for whom the majority of the AE brain health and cognition literature is based.

Study Aims:

Aim 1. Examine AE effects on structural and functional neuroimaging markers of brain health in rLLD. H1a. AE relative to SE will result in greater preservation of gray matter integrity in areas shown to be abnormal in LLD (HC and PFC) but not in the occipital cortex or thalamus. H1b. AE relative to SE will result in enhanced functional connectivity within the DMN and cross-network connectivity between the DMN and ECN. H1a. Separate ANCOVA models will be used to examine intervention group differences in change in HC and thalamus volume (mm3) and cortical thickness of PFC regions (i.e., dorsolateral PFC, medial orbitofrontal cortex, and ACC) and the occipital cortex, from baseline to 6-months, all of which will be estimated using semiautomated segmentation methods. H1b. Primary analysis of resting state functional magnetic resonance (fMRI) data will involve ANCOVAs to examine group differences in change in within-network DMN connectivity and cross-network DMN-ECN connectivity using summary network connectivity measures. Linear mixed models testing group x time interaction effect for PCC-whole brain voxel-wise connectivity maps will be used in secondary analyses.

Aim 2. Examine AE effects on cognitive functioning in rLLD. H2. AE relative to SE will improve cognitive performance, showing the greatest effect for executive functioning. Primary analyses will use ANCOVA models to examine group differences in change in performance for each cognitive domain from baseline to 6-months. Secondary analyses will involve random slopes and random intercept models for repeated longitudinal data to examine group differences in trajectory of change in performance for each cognitive domain over 6-months across three timepoints (baseline, 3-months, 6-months). Exploratory analyses will also involve a comparison of group differences in trajectory of change in objective cognitive performance relative to subjective reports of cognitive functioning.

(Exploratory) Aim 3. Explore the extent to which AE-related structural and functional brain changes are associated with AE-related cognitive changes in those with rLLD. H3. AE-related changes in HC and/or PFC integrity and/or DMN connectivity will be associated with AE-related cognitive changes. H3. Pearson's correlations will be used to examine the association between change in brain outcomes showing an effect of AE training and change in performance for cognitive domains showing an effect of AE training.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Men and women 60+ years
  • Major Depressive Episode in older adulthood (since age 55)
  • Current level of depressive symptoms does not meet criteria for a Major Depressive Episode
  • Ambulatory without pain or the assistance of walking devices
  • Able to speak and read English
  • Exercise level of <100 minutes per week on average
  • Medical clearance by primary care physician (PCP)
  • Living in community for duration of the study
  • Reliable means of transportation
  • No diagnosis of a neurological disease
  • Eligible to undergo MRI

Exclusion criteria

  • Current diagnosis of a Major Depressive Episode
  • Psychosis
  • Significant suicide risk (i.e., current, active suicidal ideation with a plan)
  • Electroconvulsive therapy within the past 12 months
  • Engaging in moderate-intensity exercise >100 minutes per week on average
  • Current treatment for cancer - except non-melanoma skin
  • Neurological condition (MS, Parkinson's, Dementia, MCI) or brain injury (Stroke)
  • Substance Use disorder in the past 3-months
  • Current treatment for congestive heart failure, angina, uncontrolled arrhythmia, deep vein thromboses (DVT) or other cardiovascular event
  • Myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass grafting, angioplasty or other cardiac condition in the past year including uncontrolled hypertension
  • Regular use of an assisted walking device
  • Presence of metal implants (pacemaker, stents) that would be MR ineligible
  • Claustrophobia
  • Color Blindness
  • Significant visual or hearing impairments that would preclude neuropsychological assessment or communication with study staff via a virtual format (videoteleconference)
  • Not fluent in English
  • Not medically cleared by PCP
  • Traveling consecutively for 3+ weeks during the study
  • MOCA (<20 to exclude) and MADRS (>9 to exclude)

Treatment and study plan

On-site AE

Other

Participants will attend on-site supervised AE sessions 3 times per week for the first 6 weeks, twice weekly for weeks 7-12; once weekly for weeks 13-18.

All supervised sessions will start and end with 5-minute warm-up and cool-down and will involve exercise on the treadmill, elliptical, and/or bike. During AE sessions, participants will exercise so that their heart rate is approximately 65% of their peak heart rate and gradually increase the intensity of exercise so that their heart rate is between 70 and 85% of their peak heart rate. All participants will wear heart rate monitors and encouraged to exercise in their target heart rate zone. Supervised AE sessions will gradually increase to 50-minutes per session

At-home AE

Other

Participants will increase at-home AE during the 6-month intervention period with weeks 19-26 occurring entirely at-home. As participants transition to home-based exercise, they will be equipped with a polar heart rate monitor and will be instructed to use this to record average heart rate during each exercise session. On a log sheet, they will record both average heart rate during exercise and average subjective rating of perceived exertion (RPE) during each exercise session.

Social Engagement (SE)

Other

To control for the social component of the AE intervention participants in the SE group will be invited to attend at total of 25 group meetings over the course of the 6-month study period.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in Cardiovascular Fitness at 6 months

    Time frame: Baseline and 6-months

    Cardiorespiratory fitness will be measured via a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) indicated by maximal VO2 on a motorized treadmill. while measuring oxygen utilization via Parvo Medics True one metabolic cart. The test follows a modified Balke protocol in which speed remains constant with the intensity being increased every two minutes via a raise of 2.0% of the incline. The speed was an agreed upon speed between participant and staff (between 2.0 and 4.0 mph). The test will conclude when the participant reaches 85% of age predicted maximal heart rate, rating of perceived exertion (RPE) equal to or greater than 15 for those who have blunted heart rate response due to beta block medication, or volitional termination by participant.

  2. Changes from baseline in Brain Structure and Function at 6 months

    Time frame: Baseline and 6-months

    Brain imaging conducted with a 7 Tesla scanner. Of particular interest are changes in hippocampal volume. This measurement is reported in mm^3, with higher numbers indicating higher levels of gray matter in the hippocampal region. Changes in prefrontal cortical thickness are also of interest, measured in mm. Brain functional network changes of interest are changes in intra- and inter-connectivity of the default-mode and executive control large-scale brain networks.

  3. Changes from baseline in depressive symptoms at 6 months

    Time frame: Baseline and 6-months

    Given that all participants will have a recent history of depression, and may have lingering low level symptoms or may even relapse, depressive symptoms will be assessed using the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADR; score ranges from 0 [better] to 60 [worse]), a clinician administered measure of depression severity.

  4. Depressive Symptoms

    Time frame: Continuously up to every 6-weeks for 6 months

    For the frequent assessment of depressive symptoms during the intervention while minimizing participant and clinician burden, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 item version (PHQ-9; score ranges from 0 [better] to 27 [worse]), a self-report questionnaire, will be administered.

  5. Change from baseline in Cognitive Function at 6 months

    Time frame: Baseline and 6-months

    Assessed with a comprehensive Neuropsychological Battery. The primary cognitive outcome will be assessed using a composite score (mean) of standardized scores (Z-scores) from the following executive functioning tests from the NIH toolbox: 1) Dimensional Change Card Sort Test (set-shifting), Flanker Inhibitory Control and Attention Test (inhibition), List Sorting Working Memory Test (working memory).

Secondary outcomes

  1. During-intervention physical activity levels

    Time frame: Continuously up to every 2 months for 6 months

    Participants will wear wrist Actigraphy to monitor physical activity levels

  2. Change from baseline in amount of physical activity at 6 months

    Time frame: Baseline and 6-months

    Participants will wear wrist Actigraphy to monitor amount of physical activity

  3. Changes from baseline in intensity of physical activity at 6 months

    Time frame: Baseline and 6-months

    Participants will wear wrist Actigraphy to monitor intensity of physical activity

  4. Change from baseline in Subjective Cognitive Function at 6 months

    Time frame: Baseline and 6-months

    Subjective reports of cognitive functioning will also be assessed using the Measurement of Everyday Cognition (E-Cog; scores range from 1 [better] to 4 [worse]), given that those with a recent history of LLD may be likely to underestimate their cognitive abilities.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Pittsburgh

Other

Collaborators

  • National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

Registry information

Official study title

Aerobic Exercise for Optimizing Cognitive and Brain Health in Remitted Late-Life Depression

Acronym: FIT BOLD

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Dec 17, 2020
Registry last updated
Nov 28, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.