Topotecan
DrugHycamtin and Carboplatin as first-line treatment of chemonaive subjects with EX-SCLC.
NCT Number: NCT00316186
This study was designed to find the safest and most effective dose of a combination of two chemotherapy drugs, Hycamtin® (topotecan) and Paraplatin® (carboplatin), in people with extensive disease small cell lung cancer.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
GSK Investigational Site, Poznan, Poland
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
CrCl may be calculated using the Cockcroft-Gault formula:
CrCl (ml/min) = Q x (140-age [yr]) x body wt [kg] 72 x serum creatinine [mg/dl] Q = 0.85 for females Q = 1.0 for males CrCl (ml/min) = K x (140-age [yr]) x body wt [kg] Serum creatinine [mol/L] K = 1.0 for females K = 1.23 for males
Exclusion criteria
Hycamtin and Carboplatin as first-line treatment of chemonaive subjects with EX-SCLC.
Hycamtin and Carboplatin as first-line treatment of chemonaive subjects with EX-SCLC.
Other names: topotecan
Time frame: Baseline until up to Day 169
The categories of tumor response were: complete response (complete disappearance of all known lesions determined by 2 measurements not less than 4 weeks apart), partial response (>50% decrease in measurable lesions for at least 4 weeks with no appearance of new lesions), stable disease (no change in tumor size for at least 8 weeks), progressive disease (>25% increase in measurements of lesions or appearance of new lesions), and not evaluable. The overall response rate was determined using a scan performed within the first 30 days of the first response.
Time frame: From start of treatment to evidence of partial or complete response
Time to response is calculated as the time from the start of treatment until first documented evidence of partial or complete response. The study was terminated after the dose-finding run-in component was completed because of slow recruitment and acknowledgement of a competing Phase II study. Data not available, as the activity stage was not done.
Time frame: From time of partial or complete response to disease progression/death
Duration of response is calculated as the time from first documented partial or complete response until first documented sign of disease progression or death. The study was terminated after the dose-finding run-in component was completed because of slow recruitment and acknowledgement of a competing Phase II study. Data not available.
Time frame: From start of treatment to disease progression/death
Time to progression is defined as the time from the start of treatment until the first documented sign of disease progression or death due to any cause, if sooner. The study was terminated after the dose-finding run-in component was completed because of slow recruitment and acknowledgement of a competing Phase II study. Data not available.
Time frame: Week 1 up to maximum of Day 519
Overall survival is defined as the time from the start of treatment until death due to any cause. The study was terminated after the dose-finding run-in component was completed because of slow recruitment and acknowledgement of a competing Phase II study. Data not available, as the activity stage of the study was not conducted.
Time frame: Week 1 through Endpoint (variable based on disease progression or toxicity)
Hematology evaluation included hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell count, white blood cell with differential and platelet count. Differential included neutrophils, bands, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils, and basophils. The intensity of each hematological toxicity was assessed according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAEs). Hematological toxicities are summarized by Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) V3.0 Maximum Toxicity Grade.
Time frame: Week 1 through Endpoint (variable based on disease progression or toxicity
Hematology evaluation included hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell count, white blood cell with differential and platelet count. Differential included neutrophils, bands, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils, and basophils. The intensity of each hematological toxicity was assessed according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAEs). Hematological toxicities are summarized by Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) V3.0 Maximum Toxicity Grade.
Time frame: Week 1 through Endpoint (variable based on disease progression or toxicity
Hematology evaluation included hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell count, white blood cell with differential and platelet count. Differential included neutrophils, bands, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils, and basophils. The intensity of each hematological toxicity was assessed according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAEs). Hematological toxicities are summarized by Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) V3.0 Maximum Toxicity Grade.
Time frame: Week 1 through Endpoint (variable based on disease progression or toxicity
Hematology evaluation included hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell count, white blood cell with differential and platelet count. Differential included neutrophils, bands, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils, and basophils. The intensity of each hematological toxicity was assessed according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAEs). Hematological toxicities are summarized by Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) V3.0 Maximum Toxicity Grade.
GlaxoSmithKline
Industry
An Open-label Phase II Study of Weekly Intravenous Hycamtin and Carboplatin as First-line Treatment of Chemonaive Subjects With Extensive Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04314895
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Gainesville, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00276276
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Pleven, Bulgaria
View Trial DetailsNCT07219251
Adenocarcinoma, Adenocarcinoma of Lung
Palo Alto, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04986670
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial Details