Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05944549

Financial Coaching and Lifestyle Intervention for Diabetes Prevention in Low-income Families

The purpose of this study is to compare the effect on weight and metabolic outcomes of an enhanced intervention, comprised of evidence-based financial coaching plus a lifestyle intervention vs. the lifestyle intervention alone

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

Houston, Texas, 77030, United States

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • English speaking parents
  • BMI>25.0 at baseline
  • must have a child participant in the Brighter Bites program at study enrollment
  • own a smartphone (Android 6 and iPhone 12.4 or later)
  • must able to participate in study activities

Exclusion criteria

  • medications known to affect appetite or body composition (e.g., corticosteroids, antidepressants, beta blockers, sulfonylureas, insulin)
  • currently diagnosed with conditions known to affect body composition or fat distribution (e.g., Cushing's syndrome, hypothyroidism)
  • diagnosis of an eating disorder
  • currently pregnant.

Treatment and study plan

Financial coaching using TrustPlus

Behavioral

Participants will be assigned a financial coach, who will, prepare a budget, conduct a soft pull of their credit report and score to analyze the credit score. Based on the participant's goals and financial limitations as highlighted by the, the participant and financial coach will create a personalized financial action plan comprising of strategies, follow-up actions, and resources, which includes unlimited access to one-on-one sessions with the financial coach. After the intensive financial coaching, participants will maintain access to the TrustPlus Portal and can continue to connect with their financial coach as needed throughout the 6-month intervention period. Participants will also have ongoing access to educational webinars and Trust+Ed, an interactive resource that provides self-guided content on many financial topics of interest, such as credit building and debt management.

Brighter Bites

Behavioral

Families receive a weekly distribution of fresh fruits and vegetables for 24 weeks, there will be Nutrition education in school throughout the school year using the evidence-based CATCH (Coordinated Approach to Child Health) program and weekly healthy recipe tastings and cooking skill demos for families during produce pick-up time.Fruit and vegetable access is complemented by CATCH, an evidence based, Texas Education Agency-approved, coordinated school health program designed to promote healthy nutrition, physical activity, and prevent obesity in schoolchildren. In addition, the Brighter Bites website and mobile app are freely available in English and Spanish.

Noom

Behavioral

Participants will get access to Noom which is a mobile app for weight loss that shifts the paradigm from dieting to a digitally supported and artificial intelligence (AI)-driven cognitive behavioral therapy approach to support personalized behavior changes towards eating, physical activity and stress management. The Noom Healthy Weight curriculum covers foundations in weight loss, nutrition, physical activity, sleep and stress management.Daily tasks (e.g., weight and food logs, readings) are organized vertically in simple cards on the phone screen, allowing users to easily scroll through what needs to be done. It will pull physical activity data (e.g., steps) directly from the health app on smartphones or apps associated with external devices such as Fitbit. Furthermore, Noom stands out from other app-based programs by assigning a personal coach to each user, helping users navigate the emotional and physiological experiences of the Noom weight loss experience.

Primary outcomes

  1. Percent weight loss

    Time frame: From baseline to 3 months

    Average of the 2 weights will be calculated

  2. Percent weight loss

    Time frame: From baseline to 6 months

    Average of the 2 weights will be calculated

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in cognitive functioning as assessed by the Flanker Inhibitory test for inhibitory control

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

    The Flanker is a measure of executive function, specifically inhibitory control and attention. Total score ranges from 0-10, and a higher score indicates higher levels of ability to attend to relevant stimuli and inhibit attention from irrelevant stimuli.

  2. Change in cognitive functioning as assessed by the List Sorting Working Memory Test for working memory

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

    This test assesses working memory. Total score ranges from 0-26, with a higher score indicating better working memory.

  3. Change in cognitive functioning as assessed by the Dimensional Change Card Sort Test (DCCS) for flexible shifting

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

    The DCCS is a measure of cognitive flexibility. Total score ranges from 0-10, and a higher score indicates a higher level of cognitive flexibility.

  4. Change in cognitive functioning as assessed by the Pattern Comparison Processing Speed Test for processing speed

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

    This test measures speed of processing by asking participants to discern whether two side-by-side pictures are the same or not. Total score ranges from 0-130, with a higher score indicating greater processing speed.

  5. Change in lipid levels

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months

  6. Change in HbA1C

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months

  7. Change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG)

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months

  8. Change in diastolic blood pressure

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

  9. Change in systolic blood pressure

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

  10. Change in financial Stress as assessed by the Financial Stress Questionnaire

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

    Participants will be asked "Did any of the following happen to you because of a shortage of money in the past 6 months?," and participants will respond Yes or No to the following items. Data will be reported as the number of items for which participants answered "Yes"--total score ranges from 0-7, and a higher score indicates greater financial stress.

    Could not pay electricity, gas or telephone bills on time Could not pay the mortgage or rent on time Pawned or sold something Went without meals Was unable to heat home Asked for financial help from friends or family Asked for help from welfare/community organizations

  11. Change in mental health as assessed by the Fast Track Project Financial Stress Questionnaire (affordability of household items)

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

    This section of the questionnaire evaluates the affordability of 7 spending sources in the household (home, clothing, furniture, car, food, medical care and leisure) on a 1 to 5 scale (strongly agree, agree, neutral, disagree, strongly disagree). Total score ranges from 7 to 35, with a higher score indicating less affordability of household items.

  12. Change in mental health as assessed by the Fast Track Project Financial Stress Questionnaire (difficulty paying bills)

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

    This section of the questionnaire assesses how much difficulty participants had paying bills on a 1 to 5 scale (a great degree of difficulty to no difficulty at all), with a higher score indicating less difficulty paying bills.

  13. Change in mental health as assessed by the Fast Track Project Financial Stress Questionnaire (money remaining at end of month)

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

    This section of the questionnaire assesses how much money was left at the end of the month on a 1 to 4 scale (not enough, just enough, some money left, more than enough money left over), with a higher score indicating more money left at the end of the month.

  14. Change in stress as assessed by the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

    This is a 10 item questionnaire and each is scored from 0(never) to 4(very often) for a maximum score range of 0-40 a higher number indicating more stress

  15. Change in anxiety as assessed by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD7)

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

    This is a 7 item questionnaire and each is scored from 0(not at all) to 3(nearly every day) for a maximum score range of 0-21 a higher number indicating more anxiety

  16. Change in depression as assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

    This is a 9 item questionnaire and each is scored from 0(not at all) to 3(nearly every day) for a maximum score range of 1-27 a higher number indicating more depression

  17. Change in quality of life as assessed by the Center for Disease Control (CDC)Population Well-Being Survey

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

    This is a 34-item questionnaire, and each item is scored on a 1-5 scale, with a higher value indicating greater well-being. Score on each of the 34 items will be reported in a separate row.

  18. Change in quality of life as assessed by the Short-Form 12 (SF-12)

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

    This is a 12 item questionnaire, scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better physical and mental health functioning

  19. Change in quality of life as assessed by the Subjective Happiness Scale (SHS)

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

    This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored form 1-7, higher number indicating greater levels of happiness

  20. Change in quality of life as assessed by the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS)

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

    This is a 5 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1( strongly disagree) to 7(strongly agree) for a maximum score range of 5-35, a higher number indicating better satisfaction

  21. Change in health behaviors as assessed by the NCI Automated 24-hour Dietary Assessment (ASA24) to analyze diet patterns

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

    This is a self reported outcome with support from a trained research dietitian by phone. ASA24 provides detailed information on intake of macronutrients and food groups, from which we can estimate the Healthy Eating Index,48 daily servings of fruit and vegetable intake, percent calorie intake from fat, protein and carbohydrates, and daily intake of sugar-sweetened beverages.

  22. Change in physical activity as assessed by the School Physical Activity and Nutrition (SPAN) survey

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

    Data will be reported in rows as the number of days per week that participants get the below amounts of exercise.

    Days per week of at least 60 min physical activity Days per week of at least 20 min vigorous physical activity Days per week of at least 30 min outdoor play

  23. Change in sedentary behavior as assessed by the School Physical Activity and Nutrition (SPAN) survey

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

    Data will be reported in rows as the number of hours per day that participants exhibit the below sedentary behaviors.

    Hours per day playing video games Hours per day watching Television or movies

  24. Change in quality of sleep as assessed by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index(PSQI)

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

    This is a 19 item questionnaire. Scores for each question range from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating more acute sleep disturbances.

  25. Change in food security as assessed by the National Health Interview Survey(NHIS) Food Insecurity Screener

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

    This is a 10 item questionnaire and the first 3 questions are scored from 1(often true) to 3(never true),the fifth and 10 questions are scored from 1(almost every month) to 3(only 1 or 2 months) and all other questions are answered as yes or no.

    Responses of "yes," "often," "sometimes," "almost every month," and "some months but not every month" were defined as affirmative responses. Based on the summed number of affirmative answers, food security was categorized into four levels: high food security (0 item affirmed), marginal food security (1-2 items affirmed), low food security (3-5 items affirmed), and very low food security (6-10 items affirmed). Participants with low or very low food security were considered food insecure.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Other

Collaborators

  • Bank of America Foundation

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Jul 13, 2023
Registry last updated
Jul 9, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.