Texas Diabetes & Endocrinology
Austin, Texas, 78731, United States
NCT Number: NCT03977727
This is an exploratory, single-center, randomized, open label, active-controlled, complete cross-over trial comparing safety and efficacy of Fiasp® versus NovoLog® when used in the Medtronic MiniMed 670G system in subjects with T1DM.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Austin, Texas, 78731, United States
This study is being performed to compare Fiasp® in terms of glycemic control with a focus on post-prandial 1-hour plasma glucose level and system-based outcomes to NovoLog® insulin when used in the Medtronic mini Med 670G HCL system (operating in auto-mode) in patients with type 1 diabetes. The investigator's hypothesis is that post prandial glucoses will be lower and time in range will be greater during the Fiasp® treatment period.
Subjects will have a 2 week screening period, 14 week treatment period and 30 Day follow up period. After at least 7 weeks on treatment period one they will crossover to treatment period two on the opposite treatment for 7 additional weeks.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
≥180 mmHg or diastolic ≥110 mmHg) at screening
-
Fiasp® used in a 670G hybrid closed loop continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion system
Novolog® used in a 670G hybrid closed loop continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion system
Other names: Aspart
CSII
Other names: Medtronic 670G pump
Time frame: 6th week of therapy
Change was calculated as the PPG value at 1 hour minus the PPG value at baseline (time -2 minutes) during meal test
Time frame: 6th week of therapy
Change was calculated as the value at 2 hour minus the value at baseline during meal test
Time frame: Weeks 1 through 6, Weeks 8 through 13
Percent of time spent is calculated as the accumulated time in hours spent within each range divided by the total number of hours spent under therapy with each drug (6 weeks each)
Time frame: Weeks 1 through 6, Weeks 8 through 13
Percent of time spent is calculated as the accumulated time in hours spent within each range divided by the total number of hours spent under therapy with each drug (6 weeks each)
Time frame: Weeks 1 through 6, Weeks 8 through 13
Percent of time spent is calculated as the accumulated time in hours spent within each range divided by the total number of hours spent under therapy with each drug (6 weeks each)
Time frame: Weeks 1 through 6, Weeks 8 through 13
Percent of time spent is calculated as the accumulated time in hours spent within each range divided by the total number of hours spent under therapy with each drug (6 weeks each)
Time frame: Weeks 1 through 6, Weeks 8 through 13
Percent of time spent is calculated as the accumulated time in hours spent within each range divided by the total number of hours spent under therapy with each drug (6 weeks each)
Time frame: Week 6, Week 13
1,5 anhydroglucitol levels were measured on the 6th week of each therapy
Time frame: Week 6, Week 13
Cumulative glycemic control expressed in fructosamine levels (micromol/Liter) were measured on the 6th week of each therapy
Time frame: Week 6, Week 13
Cumulative glycemic control expressed in HbA1c% measured on the 6th week of each therapy
Time frame: Weeks 1 through 6, Weeks 8 through 13
Change was calculated as the value on the last day of therapy minus the value on the 1st day of therapy in each period
Time frame: Weeks 1 through 6, Weeks 8 through 13
Change in %bolus insulin (units) as the value on the last day of therapy minus the value on the 1st day of therapy in each period
Time frame: Weeks 1 through 6, Weeks 8 through 13
Change in %basal insulin (units) as the value on the last day of therapy minus the value on the 1st day of therapy in each period
Time frame: Weeks 1 through 6, Weeks 8 through 13
Average amount per day (units) calculated for each participant under each therapy
Time frame: Weeks 1 through 6, Weeks 8 through 13
Average time per day (hours) calculated for each participant under each therapy
Time frame: Weeks 3 through 6, Weeks 10 through 13
Percentage of time spent in auto-mode after calibration under each therapy
Time frame: Weeks 3 through 6, Weeks 10 through 13
Percentage of time spent in manual-mode after calibration under each therapy
Time frame: Weeks 1 through 6, Weeks 8 through 13
Change was calculated as the carbohydrate ratio on the last day of therapy minus the carbohydrate ratio on the 1st day of therapy in each period
Time frame: 14 week treatment period
Number of Infusion site reactions reported by patient
Time frame: 14 week treatment period
Number of Occlusion events reported by patient
Texas Diabetes & Endocrinology, P.A.
Other
An Exploratory, Single-center, Randomized, Open Label, Active-control, Cross-over Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion of Faster-acting Insulin Aspart (Fiasp®) Compared to NovoLog® Used in the Medtronic 670G Closed Loop System in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07696039
Autoimmune Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus
Bergamo, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT03263494
Autoimmune Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07090824
Autoimmune Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus
Palo Alto, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05211479
Adolescent, Anxiety Disorders
Yalova, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details