Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT03562572

FFR Driven Complete Revascularization Versus Usual Care in NSTEMI Patients and Multivessel Disease

To compare FFR guided complete revascularization during the index procedure with usual care in non-STEMI patients with multivessel disease.

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

Background:

Patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (non-STEMI), as compared with STEMI patients, have a higher risk profile, more often MVD and less favourable outcome. Recent studies showed that complete revascularization in STEMI patients is feasible and effective. However, there is no clear evidence regarding the role of complete coronary revascularization by PCI in patients with non-STEMI with MVD.

Objective:

To compare FFR guided complete revascularization during the index procedure with usual care in non-STEMI patients with multivessel disease.

Design:

Prospective, multicentre, 1:1 randomized, investigator initiated study.

Hypothesis:

FFR guided complete percutaneous revascularisation of all significant stenosis in the non-culprit lesion performed within the index PCI procedure will improve clinical outcomes compared to the usual care, guided by discretion of the physician.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged between 18-85 years presenting with non-STEMI according to current guidelines, who will be treated with PCI of the culprit and have at least one stenosis of >50% in a non-IRA on QCA or visual estimation of baseline angiography and judged feasible for treatment with PCI by the operator.
  • Non-IRA stenosis amenable for PCI treatment (operator's decision)
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Left main disease (stenosis > 50%)
  • Chronic total occlusion of a non-IRA
  • Indication for or previous coronary artery bypass grafting
  • Uncertain culprit lesion
  • Complicated IRA treatment, e.g. extravasation, permanent no re-flow after IRA treatment (TIMI flow 0-1) and inability to implant a stent
  • Known severe cardiac valve dysfunction that will require surgery or TAVI in the follow-up period.
  • Killip class III or IV during the completion of culprit lesion treatment.
  • Life expectancy of < 1 year.
  • Intolerance to Aspirin, Clopidogrel, Prasugrel, Ticagrelor or Heparin.
  • Gastrointestinal or genitourinary bleeding within the prior 3 months.
  • Planned elective surgical procedure necessitating interruption of thienopyridines during the first 6 months post enrolment.
  • Patients who are actively participating in another drug or device investigational study, which have not completed the primary endpoint follow-up period.
  • Pregnancy

Treatment and study plan

Ischemia driven revascularization

Procedure

In the ischemia driven complete revascularisation strategy group all flow limiting (FFR ≤ 0.80) lesions will receive treatment by PCI and stenting during the index intervention

Usual Care Group

Other

In the randomised to usual care group the procedure will stop after the PCI of the culprit artery and the patient will be referred to his treating cardiologist and/ or heart team who will decide whether a staged PCI of the non- IRA artery should take place. If the treating cardiologist (after advise of the heart team) decides to perform the non-IRA PCI revascularisation, than such treatment should take place within six weeks from the primary PCI in order to count as a scheduled staged PCI procedure.

Primary outcomes

  1. The incidence of MACE at 12 months

    Time frame: 12 months

    MACE = The composite endpoint of all cause death, non-fatal Myocardial Infarction, any revascularisation and stroke at 12 months.

Secondary outcomes

  1. The incidence of MACE in subgroups at 12 and 24 months.

    Time frame: 12 and 24 months

    Prespecified subgroup analyses of primary outcomes will be performed for:

    • Diabetic patients versus non-diabetic patients
    • Elderly (≥ 75 years) versus young patients (< 75 years)
    • Male versus Female gender
    • High versus low risk patients according to GRACE Risk Score
    • Patients previous myocardial infarction versus patients with no previous myocardial infarction

    The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score estimates the admission 6 month mortality for patients with acute coronary syndrome. The GRACE score ranges from 0 to > 285. A higher GRACE represents a higher mortality risk, ranging from 0-2% when the GRACE is between 0 and 87, to 99% when the GRACE exceeds 285.

  2. Composite endpoint of Net Adverse Clinical Events (NACE) defined as composite endpoint of Cardiac death, Myocardial Infarction, any Revascularisation, Stroke and major bleeding at 12, 24 and 36 months.

    Time frame: 12, 24 and 36 months

  3. Composite endpoint hospitalisation for heart failure and unstable angina pectoris at 12, 24 and 36 months.

    Time frame: 12, 24 and 36 months

  4. All-cause mortality or Myocardial infarction at 12, 24 and 36 months.

    Time frame: 12, 24 and 36 months

  5. Any revascularisation at 12, 24 and 36 months.

    Time frame: 12, 24 and 36 months

  6. Stent thrombosis at 12, 24 and 36 months.

    Time frame: 12, 24 and 36 months

  7. Bleeding (major and minor) at 48 hours and 12 months.

    Time frame: 48 hours and 12 months

  8. The incidence of MACE at 36 months as well as outcomes of each component of MACE at 12 and 24 and 36 months.

    Time frame: 12, 24 and 36 months

    MACE = The composite endpoint of all cause death, non-fatal Myocardial Infarction, any revascularisation and stroke at 12 months.

  9. Left ventricular ejection fraction at 12 and 24 and 36 month (MIBI scan, MRI or Echocardiography).

    Time frame: 12, 24 and 36 months

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Zuyderland Medisch Centrum

Other

Collaborators

  • Brno University Hospital
  • Bács-Kiskun County Teaching Hospital
  • Gottsegen György Országos Kardiológiai Intézet
  • Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis
  • Maastricht University Medical Center
  • Radboud University Medical Center
  • Szeged University
  • VieCuri Medical Centre

Registry information

Official study title

Ischemia (FFR) Driven Complete Revascularization Versus Usual Care in Patients With Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Diseases: The South Limburg Myocardial Infarction Study Group The SLIM Study

Acronym: SLIM

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2027
First posted
Jun 19, 2018
Registry last updated
Aug 15, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.