Department of Othopedics and Rehabilitation, Medical University of Warsaw
Warsaw, Mazovian, 04-749, Poland
NCT Number: NCT05871112
Analysis of patellar positioning in the trochlear groove after TKA with and without the use of dynamic tensioner.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me60 year–99 year
All sexes
Observational
Warsaw, Mazovian, 04-749, Poland
It appears that by precisely adjusting femoral component rotation and its relation to soft tissues in the area we can achieve better function of the patellofemoral joint and thus reduce the occurrence of anterior knee pain. Achieving proper femoral component rotation is challenging, as the bony landmarks are difficult to identify. This goal may be accomplished by using a dynamic tensioner - a device that intraoperatively measures joint gap stiffness in extension and 90 degrees flexion. This is especially important in knees with high grade arthritis and limb malalignment, where ligaments' and tendons' efficiency is affected.The aim of this study was to analyze patella positioning in the trochlear groove on CT scans of patients undergoing TKR with use of a dynamic tensioner and compare it to the ones undergoing standard measured-resection technique. Secondary outcome was to assess the frequency of anterior knee pain, range of motion and patient-reported outcome 3 and 12 months after the surgery.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Assessment of femoral component rotation with a use of a dynamic tensioner in extension and 90 degrees of flexion. The tensioner was put between tibial plane cut and posterior condyles of the femur and tensioned to the same thickness of insert as in the full extension
Time frame: January 2021 - August 2021
Analysis of CT scans of patients undergoing TKR in 30 degrees of knee flexion in the days following the procedure
Time frame: January 2021 - January 2022
Assessment of range of motion 3 and 12 months after the surgery in the group with standard TKR and dynamic tensioner TKR
Time frame: January 2021 - January 2022
Assessment of patient-reported outcome 3 and 12 months after the surgery in the group with standard TKR and dynamic tensioner TKR
Time frame: January 2021 - January 2022
Assessment of the frequency of anterior knee pain 3 and 12 months after the surgery in the group with standard TKR and dynamic tensioner TKR
Medical University of Warsaw
Other
Establishing Femoral Component Rotation Using a Dynamic Tensioner Does Not Improve Patellar Position After Total Knee Replacement With Use of Anatomic Implants - Matched-cohort Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04497129
Arthralgia, Arthritis
Gilbert, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06863636
Acute Pain, Arthralgia
Mexico City, Mexico
View Trial DetailsNCT05601427
Anesthesia, Arthritis
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT03112200
Arthritis, Bone Marrow Edema
Encinitas, California, United States
View Trial Details