Montreal Children's Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, H3H 1P3, Canada
NCT Number: NCT01301352
The investigators are studying whether it is safe and effective to provide enteral nutrition to critically ill children via the nasogastric route, as opposed to the nasojejunal route, while they are receiving noninvasive positive pressure ventilation.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeUp to 17 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Montreal, Quebec, H3H 1P3, Canada
It has been our experience that the placement of post-pyloric tubes can be difficult, and that these tubes frequently become obstructed and are difficult to replace, resulting in lost caloric intake for the patient. The population where this is most relevant is children receiving Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation (NPPV). NPPV has become increasingly popular in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) population, due to its perception as a safe and effective alternative to mechanical ventilation via an endotracheal tube. Historically, NPPV has been used in children with chronic respiratory insufficiency, but its application for acute respiratory compromise is increasing. It has been shown to be effective in disease states associated with hypoventilation, and is now also being applied to respiratory problems leading to decreased oxygenation. Infants and children receiving noninvasive ventilation for respiratory failure, which is often infectious in origin, have significant caloric needs. However, it is our practice not to allow gastric feeding in these patients due to the fear of gastric distension and vomiting, which carries a risk of aspiration.
There is no data available on the question of efficacy and safety of gastric feeding in critically-ill children supported by noninvasive ventilation. Given the ease of (re)placement, and the potential nutritional benefit of earlier feeding provided by gastric feeding, it seems clinically important to question the bias against this route of enteral nutrition in noninvasively ventilated patients. The investigators therefore propose a pilot randomized trial of gastric versus post-pyloric feeds in patients on NPPV.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Safety and efficacy of feeding nasogastrically vs. nasojejunally while receiving noninvasive positive pressure ventilation
Time frame: Daily up to 14 days
Daily percent goal calories are recorded. Also total percent goal calories over entire NPPV course.
Time frame: Hours (estimated up to 48 hours)
Time frame: Days (estimated up to 14 and 28 days, respectively)
Time frame: Episodes (number - up to 1 per subject)
McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
Other
The Efficacy and Safety of Gastric Feeding in Critically Ill Pediatric Patients Receiving Non-invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation: A Pilot Study
Acronym: FeedNIV
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02779595
Aspiration Pneumonitis, Atelectasis
Würzburg, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT02419196
Aspiration Pneumonitis, Atelectasis
Würzburg, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT06304493
Behavior, Health Behavior
Aurora, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03108118
Diaphragm Injury, Mechanical Ventilation Complication
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
View Trial Details