Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01301352

Feeding Children Nasogastrically Versus Nasojejunally While Receiving Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation

The investigators are studying whether it is safe and effective to provide enteral nutrition to critically ill children via the nasogastric route, as opposed to the nasojejunal route, while they are receiving noninvasive positive pressure ventilation.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

Up to 17 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Montreal Children's Hospital

Montreal, Quebec, H3H 1P3, Canada

About this study

It has been our experience that the placement of post-pyloric tubes can be difficult, and that these tubes frequently become obstructed and are difficult to replace, resulting in lost caloric intake for the patient. The population where this is most relevant is children receiving Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation (NPPV). NPPV has become increasingly popular in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) population, due to its perception as a safe and effective alternative to mechanical ventilation via an endotracheal tube. Historically, NPPV has been used in children with chronic respiratory insufficiency, but its application for acute respiratory compromise is increasing. It has been shown to be effective in disease states associated with hypoventilation, and is now also being applied to respiratory problems leading to decreased oxygenation. Infants and children receiving noninvasive ventilation for respiratory failure, which is often infectious in origin, have significant caloric needs. However, it is our practice not to allow gastric feeding in these patients due to the fear of gastric distension and vomiting, which carries a risk of aspiration.

There is no data available on the question of efficacy and safety of gastric feeding in critically-ill children supported by noninvasive ventilation. Given the ease of (re)placement, and the potential nutritional benefit of earlier feeding provided by gastric feeding, it seems clinically important to question the bias against this route of enteral nutrition in noninvasively ventilated patients. The investigators therefore propose a pilot randomized trial of gastric versus post-pyloric feeds in patients on NPPV.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age under 18 years old
  • Acute respiratory failure as the indication for non-invasive ventilatory support
  • Signed consent from parent or guardian
  • Patients with a feeding tube in place who have not been fed in > 12 hours

Exclusion criteria

  • Immediate postoperative cardiac surgery
  • Chronic ventilatory support
  • Admission diagnosis of aspiration pneumonia
  • Known history of frequent aspiration (more than 2 previous admissions for this diagnosis)
  • Contraindication to feeding tube placement (e.g. basal skull fracture)
  • Imminent need for endotracheal intubation
  • Percutaneous gastric tube in place
  • History of Nissen fundoplication
  • Contraindication to study nutritional formulas (e.g. galactosemia)
  • Allergy to metoclopramide
  • No signed consent from parent or guardian
  • Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) with or without pressure support administered via an endotracheal tube
  • Corrected gestational age under 38 weeks
  • Patients with a feeding tube in place who have been fed within the last 12 hours
  • Patients with a feeding tube in place in whom the PICU staff do not wish to change the position of the feeding tube (i.e. do not agree to randomize the patient's feeding tube position)

Treatment and study plan

Route of feeding (nasogastric vs. nasojejunal)

Other

Safety and efficacy of feeding nasogastrically vs. nasojejunally while receiving noninvasive positive pressure ventilation

Primary outcomes

  1. The percent goal enteral calories received while receiving NPPV

    Time frame: Daily up to 14 days

    Daily percent goal calories are recorded. Also total percent goal calories over entire NPPV course.

Secondary outcomes

  1. The time required to achieve goal calories while on NPPV

    Time frame: Hours (estimated up to 48 hours)

  2. The length of stay in ICU and in hospital

    Time frame: Days (estimated up to 14 and 28 days, respectively)

  3. Episodes of clinically important gastric aspiration

    Time frame: Episodes (number - up to 1 per subject)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre

Other

Registry information

Official study title

The Efficacy and Safety of Gastric Feeding in Critically Ill Pediatric Patients Receiving Non-invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation: A Pilot Study

Acronym: FeedNIV

Important dates

Study start
2011
Primary completion
2014
Study completion
2014
First posted
Feb 23, 2011
Registry last updated
Jul 16, 2014

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.