ICES
Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5, Canada
NCT Number: NCT04187742
There is a high rate of inappropriate antibiotic use in LTC facilities, with both unnecessary initiation and prolongation of treatments. Although there are challenges to rational antibiotic use in LTC, the variability in antibiotic initiation and use of prolonged treatment durations is driven by prescriber tendencies rather than resident characteristics. Audit-and-feedback is a well-established intervention to improve professional practices, and is ideally suited for use to improve antibiotic prescribing tendencies in LTC. The literature is saturated with trials indicating benefit of audit-and-feedback, but is in dire need of studies to identify methods to improve the impact of this technique. Health Quality Ontario (HQO), a key partner in the FIRST AID-LTC research program, is already providing audit-and-feedback for other inappropriate prescribing practices in LTC, and has identified antibiotic prescribing as a priority focus.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeAll sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5, Canada
The overarching goals of FIRST AID - LTC are two-fold:
Specific Aims
To advance audit-and-feedback implementation science:
Anticipated Contributions to Health-Related Knowledge
Although the literature is inundated with trials examining the impact of audit-and-feedback compared to usual care, there is a need for studies to improve audit-and-feedback delivery. FIRST AID-LTC will test optimal delivery and peer comparison techniques for audit-and-feedback. The knowledge learned can be extrapolated to antibiotic interventions in LTC in other provinces across Canada, as well more broadly to inappropriate medication prescribing practices in LTC.
Anticipated Contributions to Health Care, Health Systems and Health Outcomes
FIRST AID-LTC will lead to immediate reductions in excess antibiotic use in Ontario LTC facilities, which in turn should result in substantial reductions in direct drug costs, as well as downstream complications of allergy, organ toxicity, C. difficile infections and antimicrobial resistance. With easy transferability to other Canadian provinces, the improvements in cost-savings and patient outcomes could be massive in scope.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
To Identify an LTC Resident
Inclusion criteria
An individual having a minimum of 2 records on separate days within the quarter meeting any combination of the following criteria:
Index date = The analysis will be anchored on the most recent of either of the records above with a given quarter or their date of death (whichever date is earliest)
Exclusion criteria
To identify the Most Responsible Physician (MRP) Using Virtual Rostering
For each patient in the above resident cohort, the study team will retrieve all records from health care providers in the 6 month period preceding the index date (180 days), keeping only records from physicians who have a specialty of 1) general practice, 2) community medicine or 3) geriatrics.
Steps for MRP assignment:
Step 1) The study team will first select physicians with highest count of OHIP records for the monthly management of a nursing home or home for the aged. This is completed for as many residents as possible.
Step 2) If there were no monthly management fee records as described above then the physician with the highest count of non-emergency long-term care inpatient services records for each patient will be selected. This step is only applied to residents who could not be matched to a physician by Step 1. **Physician must have seen the patient one or more times in 90 days prior to and including index date to be considered MRP. This criteria is applied to ensure the physician has seen the resident within the reporting quarter.
Step 3) Some patients will virtually roster to physicians in Enrollment groups, some will virtually roster to physicians that are not in a group. For these, we will recode enrollment program type to 'NOR' (not otherwise rostered) - these are likely fee for service physicians.
Evaluate whether emails with social comparison incentives will encourage greater report opening by physicians leading to greater reductions in antibiotic use, than a standard email without social comparison incentives
Evaluate whether emails with maintenance certification incentives will encourage greater report opening by physicians leading to greater reductions in antibiotic use, than a standard email without social comparison incentives
Evaluate whether emails informing physicians of their report opening status (among those who have previously opened at least one report and those who have never opened a report) will encourage greater report opening by physicians leading to greater reductions in antibiotic use, than a standard email without report opening status information
Time frame: 3 months
Percentage of physicians opening/accessing the report at least once in the 3 month interval following email send out
Time frame: 3 months
The percentage of a LTC physicians' patients that experienced an ER visit or hospitalization due to a potential antibiotic-related harm, including: allergy, general medicine adverse event, diarrhea, C. difficile infection, or infection with an antibiotic-resistant organism
Time frame: 3 months
To test for harms related to decreased antibiotic use by comparing the percentage of LTC physicians' patients that experience an infection-related ER visit or admission
Time frame: 3 months
Measure the net clinical impact of the intervention, by comparing all-cause ER visits and hospitalizations and mortality
Time frame: 3 months
The percent reduction in anti-psychotic use
Time frame: 3 months
The percent reduction in benzodiazepines
Time frame: 3 months
Percentage of patients initiated on an antibiotic
Time frame: 3 months
Percentage of antibiotic treatments prolonged > 7 days
Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences
Other
Feedback to Improve Rational Strategies of Antibiotic Initiation and Duration in Long Term Care (Phase 2)
Acronym: FIRST AID-LTC
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03807466
Antibiotic Duration, Antibiotic Initiation
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT05023200
Antibiotic Duration, Cellulitis
Brighton, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT05226260
Abscess, Antibiotic Duration
Columbus, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07334795
Antibiotic, Antibiotic Duration
Murray, Utah, United States
View Trial Details