Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03505593

Feasibility Study to Evaluate Safety of ENvizion Medical™ ENVUE™ System

This is a single center, non-randomized feasibility clinical evaluation that is designed to affirm the safety of the ENVUE™ System guidance during the placement of the ENvizion Medical™ enteral feeding tubes.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Age range

21 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

St.Vincent Hospital and Health Care Center, Inc.

Indianapolis, Indiana, 46260, United States

About this study

Enteral nutrition is the preferred route for the provision of nutritional support in most critical ill patients with functional gastrointestinal tract. Achieving early enteral nutrition (EN) in critically ill patients is associated with fewer major complications, reduced mortality and length of hospital stay, and significant cost savings. It is estimated that approximately 1.2 million feeding tubes are placed blindly each year in the United States alone. Despite the obvious advantages of the enteral tube feeding, inadvertent placement of Enteral Feeding Tube (EFT) into the airway is relatively common and can result in significant pulmonary injury including pneumothorax and pneumonia. Airway misplacement occurs in 1.2- 4 % of blind EFT insertions, with 0.2 to 1.2% of all the feeding tube placements cause pulmonary complications to patients. The gold standard for detecting inadvertent placement of a feeding tube in the lungs is radiography. However, because of its cost, possible delay of feedings while waiting for radiography, and risk for radiation exposure, clinicians continue to seek for alternative methods to confirm correct placement.

All the above mentioned, emphasizes the fact that safe and effective delivery of nasoenteral tube feedings requires assurance that the feeding tube tip is in a proper position. The ENVUE™ System is an electromagnetic tracking system which tracks the path of the feeding tube during placement. The benefit of the system when EFT is misdirected into the pulmonary system is a real-time visual tracing, which may prompt users to withdraw the tube and reinsert it.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients must be >21 years of age
  • Patients must require placement of an enteral feeding tube
  • Patients have an endotracheal tube, OR Do not have an endotracheal tube but are sedated (RASS score of -2 or less) and/or obtunded (Glasgow Coma scale of 9-12)
  • Patients or legal authorized representative must be able to understand and adhere to all protocol procedures and be willing and able to provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients must not have a history of:
  • Esophageal varices or ulcers
  • Upper airway obstruction
  • Upper GI stenosis or obstruction
  • Trauma involving sinuses, nares face or neck that would prevent nasogastric (NG) or oral tube insertion
  • Deformities of the sinus cavities and/or skull base
  • Esophageal cancer or neoplasm
  • Patients must not have a significant concomitant illness that would adversely affect their participation in the study
  • Female patients who are pregnant or lactating

Treatment and study plan

ENVUE System

Device

The ENvizion Medical™ ENVUE™ System is designed to aid qualified operators in the placement of the ENvizion Medical™ Enteral Feeding Tube™ into the stomach or small intestine.

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Successfully Placed Enteral Feeding Tube

    Time frame: During procedure visit

    Enteral tube (EFT) can be placed in the correct anatomical position without occurrence of guidance-related adverse events.

    Procedure success was evaluated by comparing tube tip location according to the ENVUE System and abdominal and/or thoracic X-Ray.

    Guidance-related AEs were evaluated through the documentation of any guidance-related serious adverse events (SAE) or adverse events (AE) occurring during a subject's participation in the study.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Total Number of Placement Attempts

    Time frame: During procedure visit

    Number of placement attempts was evaluated by number of replacement and repositioning events, as defined below:

    • Replacement: Complete removal of the tube from the patient or retraction above the level of the pharynx followed by reinsertion
    • Repositioning: Changing position of tube without complete removal of the tube
  2. Number of Retrograde Tube Migration Events

    Time frame: During follow-up visit (20-48 hours post tube placement)

    Tube Migration was defined as: Retrograde migration from desired placement position.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Envizion Medical Ltd.

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Feasibility Study to Evaluate the Clinical Safety of ENvizion Medical™ Enteral Feeding Tube Placement Using the ENvizion Medical™ ENVUE™ System in Patients

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2018
First posted
Apr 23, 2018
Registry last updated
Sep 10, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.