Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
Hanover, Germany
NCT Number: NCT04512703
Prospective, non-interventional, feasibility study. 8 months, from start of screening to finishing the study. Multi-center study, with a maximum of 8 centers in Europe. Health adult volunteers (21 years or older) and adult patients with a clinical indication for ambulatory outpatient cardiac monitoring.
To observe the feasibility of remotely monitoring patients with the novel µCor Heart Failure and Arrhythmia Management System (µCor system ) that non-invasively captures thoracic fluid content, electrocardiogram, heart rate, respiratory rate, activity, and body posture. tory outpatient cardiac monitoring.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me21 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Hanover, Germany
The study will consist of two phases. Phase I of the study will enroll 6 healthy volunteers, who have no indication for remote cardiac monitoring. Subjects are required to participate in the study for 30 days.
Phase II of the study will enroll up to 44 patients indicated for outpatient cardiac monitoring and will participate in the study for up to 90 days.
All subjects will wear the device in two locations, one along the left midaxillary line and the other along the left midclavicular line for the first seven days.
Thereafter, for the remainder of the study, half the enrolled subjects will only wear the device in the left midclavicular position and the other half will wear the device in the left midaxillary position. Subjects will use a diary to keep a daily log their activities of daily living (phase I) or a log of any symptoms related to heart rhythm abnormalities and heart failure (phase II).
Data will be acquired with the µCor system and wirelessly transmitted daily to a remote server for processing, generating thoracic fluid content, ECG, heart rate, respiration rate, activity, and posture measurements. Investigators will have access only to ECG data.
Study staff will make weekly phone calls to subjects and record any new clinically actionable events. Patients will have monthly office visits. At the end of 30 days (phase I) or 90 days (phase II), patients will end wear and will complete the study follow-up questionnaire.
The study will enroll a maximum of 50 subjects. Six healthy volunteers will be enrolled for phase I of the study. Remaining 44 subjects will be enrolled for phase II and will have an indication of outpatient cardiac monitoring.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
-Inclusion Criteria
The following criteria will be used to include subjects in phase I portion of the study:
The following criteria will be used to include subjects in phase II portion of the study:
The following criteria will be used to exclude subjects from phases I and II portions of the study:
Sensor Monitor for arrhythmia and other bio-metric markers
Time frame: Period 1: Start of device wear at Day 0 to Day 7 and Period 2: Day 8 to 90
Logistics will be assessed by the number of subjects successfully fitted with a device that was able to transmit data to the remote server. Device Setup
Time frame: Period 1: Start of device wear at Day 0 to Day 7 and Period 2: Day 8 to 90
Total number of days the device is worn at least once, in the devices indicated for long term wear in the heart arryhthmia group. These devices were worn during both Period 1 and Period 2, and the outcome measure was assessed irrespective of whether the device was being worn in Period 1 or Period 2.
Time frame: Period 1: Start of device wear at Day 0 to Day 7 and Period 2: Day 8 to 90
Subject Training will be assessed by measuring the incidence of correct device placement. Correct device placement was assessed irrespective of whether the device was being worn in Period 1 or Period 2.
Time frame: Period 1 and Period 2
Count of subjects that had daily data transmission.
Time frame: Period 1: Start of device wear at Day 0 to Day 7 and Period 2: Day 8 to 90
Timely arrythmia monitoring will be assessed by the mean time from arrythmia event trigger to publication of arrythmia report to investigator. Timing or arrhythmia monitoring reporting was assessed irrespective of whether the device was being worn in Period 1 or Period 2.
Time frame: Period 1: Start of device wear at Day 0 to Day 7 and Period 2: Day 8 to 90
Assessed by the total number of clinical events documented including arrythmia symptoms, physician office visits, ER visits, hospitalizations, and mortality in both the healthy group and arrhythmia monitoring group. The number or clinical events documented was assessed irrespective of whether the device was being worn in Period 1 or Period 2.
Time frame: Period 1: Start of device wear at Day 0 to Day 7
The TFC measurement was compared between front and side placed devices. TFC is a unitless measurement that encompasses the degree of reflected radar waves in the lung taken by the study device. Higher TFC is indicative of increased fluid, whereas lower TFC is indicative of decreased fluid.
Time frame: Period 1: Start of device wear at Day 0 to Day 7 and Period 2: Day 8 to 90
Device recordings were assessed and compared to clinical events in both the healthy group and arrhythmia monitoring group. Device recording associations were assessed irrespective of whether the device was being worn in Period 1 or Period 2.
Time frame: Period 1: Start of device wear at Day 0 to Day 7 and Period 2: Day 8 to 90
Device recording stability was assessed through the heart rate coefficient of variation in both front and side placed devices. Stability was assessed irrespective of whether the device was being worn in Period 1 or Period 2.
Time frame: Period 1: Start of device wear at Day 0 to Day 7
Respiration rates were compared between front and side placed devices. The outcome was measured only during Period 1 when both front and side devices were worn simultaneously.
Time frame: Period 1: Start of device wear at Day 0 to Day 7
Activity counts were compared between front and side devices.
Time frame: Period 1: Start of device wear at Day 0 to Day 7
Sleep angle was compared between front and side devices.
Zoll Medical Corporation
Industry
Ambulatory Remote Patient Monitoring With the µCor Heart Failure and Arrhythmia Management System (PATCH) Feasibility Study
Acronym: PATCH
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06637085
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Cardiovascular Diseases
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT05966922
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Cardiovascular Diseases
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT05239364
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Hamburg, Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT04179643
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Cardiovascular Diseases
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
View Trial Details