Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07389434

Feasibility, Safety, Cost-effectiveness, and Environmental Impact of Reprocessed Ablation Catheters in PVI

This study evaluates whether re-sterilized (reprocessed) ablation catheters are as effective and safe as new ablation catheters when used for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation. Adult patients scheduled for catheter ablation will be randomly assigned to undergo the procedure using either a new catheter or a re-sterilized catheter, with identical procedural techniques applied in both groups. The study will compare procedural efficiency, safety, costs, and environmental impact between the two approaches. The results may support more sustainable and cost-effective use of medical devices in cardiac electrophysiology.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

UH Dubrava

Zagreb, 10000, Croatia

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Ivan Zeljković, MD, Phd

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Mihovil Santini, MD

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

About this study

This is a prospective, randomized, controlled non-inferiority trial comparing re-sterilized (reprocessed) and new ablation catheters for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation. The study will be conducted at University Hospital Dubrava, a high-volume tertiary center for cardiac electrophysiology.

Patients scheduled for pulmonary vein isolation will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio using a computer-generated sequence to undergo ablation with either a new or a re-sterilized catheter. All procedures will be performed by experienced electrophysiologists in accordance with standard institutional practice.

Procedure duration will be measured from transseptal puncture to completion of ablation of all pulmonary veins. Additional procedural parameters related to ablation delivery, including duration and number of energy applications, total ablation time, and other procedural timing characteristics, will also be recorded. Fluoroscopy time and radiation dose, expressed as dose-area product (DAP), will be recorded automatically.

Catheter performance will be assessed based on achievement of complete pulmonary vein isolation, the number of energy applications per pulmonary vein, and procedural assessment of catheter integrity, flexibility, and electrical properties.

Procedural safety will be evaluated by monitoring peri-procedural and post-procedural adverse events, including pericardial effusion, stroke, vascular complications, and death. Laboratory markers of inflammation, infection, and hemolysis will be obtained at predefined time points before and after the procedure. Blood cultures will be collected after the procedure to assess potential infectious complications.

Patients will be followed clinically during hospitalization and after discharge through telephone contact and routine outpatient visits.

Economic evaluation will include direct procedural costs, catheter costs, and re-sterilization costs. Environmental impact will be assessed based on medical waste generation and estimated carbon footprint associated with catheter use.

Re-sterilization of ablation catheters will be performed according to the validated internal protocol of University Hospital Dubrava, which has been used in routine clinical practice.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation documented by ECG or Holter ECG monitoring
  • Indication for pulmonary vein isolation according to current clinical guidelines
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Severe valvular heart disease
  • Significant structural heart disease that precludes pulsed field ablation (PFA)
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Life expectancy < 12 months

Treatment and study plan

Participants will undergo pulmonary vein isolation using pulsed field ablation (PFA). The intervention consists of the use of either a reprocessed electroporation ablation catheter or a new electropor

Procedure

This intervention involves pulmonary vein isolation performed with ablation catheter that is either new or reprocessed. The reprocessed catheter has undergone validated cleaning, resterilization, and functional testing in accordance with regulatory and safety standards prior to reuse. The key distinguishing feature of this intervention is the comparison of reprocessed versus new single-use catheters, while all other procedural aspects, including operator technique, energy delivery protocol, and peri-procedural care, are standardized and identical between groups.

Primary outcomes

  1. Pulmonary Vein Isolation Procedure Duration

    Time frame: From the start of the index ablation procedure until its completion.

    Procedure duration, expressed in minutes, measured from transseptal puncture to completion of ablation of all pulmonary veins. Additional procedural parameters, including duration of individual procedural segments, total ablation time, number and duration of energy applications, and other time-related procedural characteristics, will also be recorded.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Procedural Catheter Performance Parameters

    Time frame: From the start of the index ablation procedure until its completion

    Catheter functional performance assessed by successful pulmonary vein isolation, number of energy applications per pulmonary vein, total ablation time, and procedural assessment of catheter integrity and flexibility.

  2. Medical Waste Generated Per Procedure

    Time frame: Periprocedural

    Amount of medical waste generated per ablation procedure, expressed in kilograms.

  3. Fluoroscopy Time

    Time frame: From the start of the index ablation procedure until its completion

    Total fluoroscopy time, expressed in minutes, recorded during the ablation procedure.

  4. Radiation Dose (Dose-Area Product)

    Time frame: From the start of the index ablation procedure until its completion

    Radiation exposure expressed as dose-area product (DAP), automatically recorded during the ablation procedure.

  5. Incidence of Peri- and Post-Procedural Complications

    Time frame: Up to 30 days following the index ablation procedure

    Number of participants with peri-procedural and post-procedural complications, including pericardial effusion, stroke, vascular complications, and death.

  6. Direct Procedural Costs Per Patient

    Time frame: Periprocedural

    Direct procedural costs per patient, including catheter cost, procedure-related costs, and re-sterilization costs, expressed in local currency.

  7. Estimated Carbon Footprint Per Procedure

    Time frame: From the start of the index ablation procedure until its completion.

    Estimated carbon footprint associated with the ablation procedure and catheter use, expressed in CO₂-equivalent units.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Ivan Zeljković, PhD,MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+385917823289

Mihovil Santini, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+385958101778

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University Hospital Dubrava

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Feasibility, Safety, Cost-effectiveness, and Environmental Impact of Reprocessed Ablation Catheters in Pulmonary Vein Isolation

Acronym: RE-USE PVI

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Feb 5, 2026
Registry last updated
Feb 5, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.