Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01230450

Feasibility of Comparing Two Surgical Treatment of Female Urodynamic Stress

Aim: The study aim to assess the feasibly a large prospective multi-centre randomised study for comparing the relatively new "Single incision sub-urethral tapes" with the standard surgical treatment of female urodynamic stress incontinence (USI).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

20 year and older

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 1

Primary location

(Grampian) Aberdeen Royal Infermary

Aberdeen, Aberdeenshire, AB25 2ZD, United Kingdom

About this study

Single incision tension-free sub-urethral vaginal tapes procedures8 have been recently described in an attempt to avoid the blind passage of the trochars through the groin & the adductor muscles and consequently reducing the incidence & severity of postoperative leg pain. The obvious advantages would be shorter hospital stay, early recovery, early resumption of day to day activities & earlier return to work. A number of small prospective audits and case-series have been presented in international conferences reporting on the safety & outcomes for these procedures. However all these studies were for preliminary reports for proof of concept and therefore the studies populations were 15-70 women with short term follow-up of 2-3 month9-11.These studies have shown low perioperative complication rates: bladder injury 0-1%, vaginal erosion 1-3% & one study showing 1.3% pain at 6 weeks follow-up. The patient reported success rates were 77-93% at 2-3 month follow-up9-12.

Objectives:

  • Establish the feasibility of the "Single incision sub-urethral tapes" to be done under local anaesthesia.
  • The feasibility of randomisation to the standard surgical treatment TVT-O / TVT.
  • To compare the surgical approach in this relatively new procedure against the standard procedures as regard: Peri-operative complication rates, Postoperative pain, Time to discharge from the hospital,
  • To compare the outcomes as regard: Patient-reported cure rates, Patient satisfaction, Impact on Quality of life (QoL) and sexual function at 3 month & 1 -year follow-up. The objective cure rates will be assessed at 3 month follow-up.

Design:

A pilot prospective randomised study within participating urogynaecology units of the "Scottish Pelvic Floor Network".

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • USI
  • Mixed incontinence symptoms with predominantly bothering stress component (No DO on UDS).
  • Primary Incontinence Surgery.
  • BMI < 35
  • Ability to understand the information leaflet and sign an informed consent form in English.
  • All would have had failed or declined PFMT.

Exclusion criteria

  • Mixed incontinence with pre-dominant OAB and/or Neurological conditions e.g. MS.
  • Detrusor Overactivity on Urodynamics.
  • Inability to understand English.
  • Un-willing for randomisation.
  • Concomitant surgery.
  • Patient requiring postoperative hospital-stay for medical or social reasons

Treatment and study plan

sub-urethral tape (TVT-O)

Procedure

Tension free vaginal tape vs. single incision sub-urethral tension free vaginal tape

stand standard mid-urethral sling (TVT-O)

Other

Primary outcomes

  1. • Feasibility of the single incision sub-urethral tape to be done under local anaesthesia

    Time frame: 1 year

    • Feasibility of the single incision sub-urethral tape to be done under local anaesthesia?
    • Number of women approached and declining LA o Number of women in LA group converted to GA

Secondary outcomes

  1. • Patient-reported Success rates

    Time frame: 1 year

    Patient-reported Success rates

    o Assessed by PGI-I "Very Much Improved/ Much Improved."

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Aberdeen

Other

Collaborators

  • Aberdeen Royal Infirmary

Registry information

Official study title

Feasibility of Comparing Two Surgical Treatment of Female Urodynamic Stress Incontinence (SITOT)

Acronym: SITOT

Important dates

Study start
2009
Primary completion
2010
Study completion
2011
First posted
Oct 29, 2010
Registry last updated
Jan 24, 2013

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.