Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05287594

Feasibility of a Train-the-Trainer Delivered Exercise Intervention in Firefighters

Purpose: To collect and report feasibility data for conducting a future cluster randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy of a TRAINER delivered integrated exercise program in career firefighters, and to determine intervention fidelity and preliminary effects of a TRAINER delivered integrated exercise program in career firefighters.

Participants: 52 career firefighters 18 - 60 years old (40 trainees, 6 trainers, 6 administrators).

Procedures (methods): Enrolled fire stations will be randomly assigned (3:2 allocation ratio) to a TRAINER or wait-list control (CON) group, stratified by city, using computer-generated random numbers. All enrolled firefighters will undergo a series of assessments at baseline (week 0) and post-testing (week 7) following the TRAINER delivered 6-week intervention.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–60 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

UNC Chapel Hill

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Provide informed consent prior to any study procedures are performed
  • Medically cleared for fire suppression duties
  • A career firefighter from a local department (Carrboro, Chapel Hill, and Durham)

Exclusion criteria

  • Highly active firefighters, defined as performing 4 or more days/week of vigorous exercise
  • Pregnancy
  • Recent injury preventing their participation in the exercise routine
  • Involved in an active workers' compensation or personal injury case

Treatment and study plan

Integrated Exercise Program

Behavioral

Neuromuscular warm-up: Each participant will perform a series of dynamic stretches, core stability, balance, and medicine ball exercises. The dynamic stretches include 8 repetitions of 6 stretches targeting the hip and thigh musculature, followed by 3 core stability isometric exercises (curl-up, side bridge, and bird dog). Participants will then perform 2 sets (per leg) of hop-to-stabilization (with a reach) balance exercises, followed by 3 separate medicine ball exercises emphasizing explosive full-body movements.

High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT): HIIT will include a series of high intensity exercise bouts on a stationary bike that includes a 1:1 work-to-rest ratio. Training intensity will be determined from the peak power output obtained during the baseline VO2 peak assessment and progressively increased by the number of bouts and intensity. The number of work bouts will increase from 5 to 8 bouts and the intensity will increase from 90 to 110% of peak power output.

Other names: Neuromuscular warm-up, High intensity interval training, HIIT

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Firefighters and Fire Stations Recruited to the Study (Feasibility)

    Time frame: Within 14 months

    To demonstrate the feasibility of an integrated exercise program. Feasibility will be defined as recruitment of 40 firefighters and the number of fire stations (out of 26 potential) to the study within 14 months.

  2. Percentage of Firefighters Retained (Feasibility)

    Time frame: Week 7 (post-intervention)

    To demonstrate the feasibility of an integrated exercise program. Retention will be determined from the percentage of firefighters retained at post-testing. Retention of 80% or higher will be considered good feasibility.

  3. Percentage of Sessions Attended (Feasibility)

    Time frame: Week 7 (post-intervention)

    To demonstrate the feasibility of an integrated exercise program. Adherence will be determined from the percentage of sessions attended out of total (12) sessions. Adherence of 80% or higher will be considered good feasibility.

  4. Qualitative Summaries of Participant Experience in Semi-Structured Interviews (Acceptability)

    Time frame: Week 7 (post-intervention)

    Acceptability will be assessed by semi-structured interviews with the firefighters, peer-trainers, and departmental administration (e.g. fire chiefs). Qualitative summaries for intrapersonal, interpersonal, and organizational constructs will be reported.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in cardiorespiratory fitness as measured by VO2 peak during cycle ergometry

    Time frame: Baseline (i.e., pre-intervention), 7 weeks (i.e., post-intervention)

    Cardiorespiratory fitness will be measured by peak oxygen consumption (VO2 peak). All participants will perform a cycling ergometer test with respiratory gases continuously monitored with open-circuit spirometry (True One 2400®, Parvo-Medics, Inc., Provo, UT). Data will be averaged over 15-second intervals, with the highest 15-second oxygen consumption recorded as the VO2 peak.

  2. Change in body composition as measured by % body fat from a 4-compartment model

    Time frame: Baseline (i.e., pre-intervention), 7 weeks (i.e., post-intervention)

    Body composition will be evaluated to determine the effects of the intervention on % body fat. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA;General Electric Lunar iDXA, Chicago, IL) and bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy (BIS; ImpediMed SFB7, Queensland, AU) will be used to determine a gold-standard DXA-derived four-compartment model of % body fat.

  3. Change in explosive muscle strength as measured by dynamometry

    Time frame: Baseline (i.e., pre-intervention), 7 weeks (i.e., post-intervention)

    All participants will perform a rapid and maximal isometric muscle action on a calibrated isokinetic dynamometer (CSMi, Stoughton, MA) against a padded and stiff lever arm for 3-4 seconds. The peak rate of torque development will be determined from the peak of the first derivative of the torque-time curve.

  4. Change in low-back muscular endurance as measured by a modified Biering-Sorensen test

    Time frame: Baseline (i.e., pre-intervention), 7 weeks (i.e., post-intervention)

    Low-back muscular endurance (time to task failure) will be examined using a modified version of the Biering-Sorensen test, using a variable angle Roman chair (Powerlift, Jefferson, IA).

  5. Change in balance as measured by a modified star excursion balance test

    Time frame: Baseline (i.e., pre-intervention), 7 weeks (i.e., post-intervention)

    Balance will be determined by using a modified star excursion balance test. Following a familiarization, participants will reach with their free limb as far as possible in the anterior, posterolateral, and posteromedial direction relative to the stance leg. Scores will be normalized to leg length.

  6. Fidelity of the neuromuscular warm-up as measured by a rubric across sessions at Week 2

    Time frame: 2 weeks (i.e., beginning of intervention following train-the-trainer completion)

    The fidelity of the neuromuscular warm-up will be examined using a scoring rubric. The rubric evaluates the leadership abilities of the trainers and the execution of the exercises by the firefighters. Each item is scored 1 to 5 with 1 indicating no correctness and 5 indicating complete correctness. Items will be summed for a total score. Higher values mean higher fidelity.

  7. Fidelity of the neuromuscular warm-up as measured by a rubric across sessions at Week 6

    Time frame: 6 weeks (i.e., one of last 2 sessions)

    The fidelity of the neuromuscular warm-up will be examined using a scoring rubric. The rubric evaluates the leadership abilities of the trainers and the execution of the exercises by the firefighters. Each item is scored 1 to 5 with 1 indicating no correctness and 5 indicating complete correctness. Items will be summed for a total score. Higher values mean higher fidelity.

  8. Fidelity of the HIIT protocol as measured by rate of peak power output across sessions at Week 2

    Time frame: 2 weeks (i.e., beginning of intervention following train-the-trainer completion)

    Fidelity will be assessed to ensure participant adherence to the intervention protocol in each session. The fidelity of the HIIT protocol will be examined by recording the prescribed peak power output (90-110%) during the training session. Training intensity will be established from a percentage of the baseline peak power output (Watts) achieved during the VO2 peak test. Higher fidelity is indicated as the percent power output more closely approaches the prescribed power output percentage.

  9. Fidelity of the HIIT protocol as measured by rate of peak power output across sessions at Week 6

    Time frame: 6 weeks (i.e., one of last 2 sessions)

    Fidelity will be assessed to ensure participant adherence to the intervention protocol in each session. The fidelity of the HIIT protocol will be examined by recording the prescribed peak power output (90-110%) during the training session. Training intensity will be established from a percentage of the baseline peak power output (Watts) achieved during the VO2 peak test. Higher fidelity is indicated as the percent power output more closely approaches the prescribed power output percentage.

  10. Change in physical activity as measured by the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form

    Time frame: Baseline (i.e., pre-intervention), 7 weeks (i.e., post-intervention)

    Physical activity will be examined using the validated 7-day recall International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form. Higher scores represent greater total metabolic equivalent of task (MET) minutes of physical activity per week based on the following estimates: 3.3 MET units for walking, 4.4 MET units for moderate activity, 8 MET units for vigorous activity. Total MET minutes of physical activity is calculated from the questionnaire using the following calculation:

    Total MET-min/week = (Walk METs*min*days) + (Mod METs*min*days) + Vig METs*min*days)

    The study will test whether there is a BASELINE-to-POST increase in total scores on the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (units: MET minutes/week) for the TRAINER group relative to the waitlist control group. The outcome for each group is computed as the main of the difference of the POST score minus the BASELINE score.

  11. Change in nutrition as measured by the Rapid Eating Assessment for Participants-Short Form

    Time frame: Baseline (i.e., pre-intervention), 7 weeks (i.e., post-intervention)

    Nutritional habits will be examined using the validated Rapid Eating Assessment for Participants-Short Form. Responses of 'usually/often' receives 1 point, 'sometimes' receives 2 points, and 'rarely/never or does not apply to me' receives 3 points. Possible scores ranged from 13 to 39 with a higher score indicating better nutritional habits. The study will test whether there is a BASELINE-to-POST increase in total scores on the Rapid Eating Assessment for Participants-Short Form for the TRAINER group relative to the waitlist control group. The outcome for each group is computed as the main of the difference of the POST score minus the BASELINE score.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Other

Collaborators

  • National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH/CDC)

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Mar 18, 2022
Registry last updated
Dec 19, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.