Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04253808

Feasibility of a Carbohydrate-restricted, High-fat Diet on Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Outcomes

This study will test the feasibility of a carbohydrate-restricted, high-fat (CRHF) diet intervention in newly diagnosed head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients who will receive definitive radiation.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Augusta Victoria Hospital

East Jerusalem, Palestinian Territories

About this study

Our previous observational research indicates that a pretreatment diet high in total carbohydrates is associated with increased risk of all-cause and disease-specific mortality in head and neck cancer. The purpose of this study is to conduct a single-blinded randomized controlled trial to test the feasibility of a carbohydrate-restricted, high-fat (CRHF) diet intervention in newly diagnosed head and neck cell squamous carcinoma (HNSCC) patients who will receive definitive radiation. The secondary aim is to collect preliminary data on the effect of the intervention on tumor progression, nutritional status, body composition, quality of life, and symptom burden.

Thirteen newly diagnosed HNSCC non-metastatic patients were recruited from Augusta Victoria Hospital in East Jerusalem and randomized into one of two arms; a carbohydrate-restricted, high-fat diet arm (arm A) and a regular diet composition arm (Arm B). Arm A (N=6) were provided a CRHF diet both neoadjuvantly (for 2 weeks prior to treatment) and adjuvantly (during treatment with radiation). Arm B (N=7) received standard oncologic treatment including a regular diet (50-52% carbohydrates, 30% fats, and 18-20% proteins). Feasibility outcomes, including recruitment, retention, intervention adherence, and safety were tracked weekly. Biomarkers, tumor progression, nutritional status, body composition, QOL, and symptoms were assessed at baseline, 2-weeks, and 2-3 months post-treatment. A control group (N=26) included HNSCC patients who follow the same applicable eligibility criteria and did not receive any kind of dietary intervention. Medical information were collected retrospectively from the control group patients' files. Information on demographics (age, sex, smoking status, weight, height, marital status, education, occupation, and residency), tumor site, cancer stage, treatment dose reduction, treatment break, early cessation of treatment, hospitalization, symptoms, and weight loss, were collected during treatment from arms A and B and retrospectively from the control group.

This proposed pilot/feasibility study is the first step in determining if a CRHF diet is an effective treatment modality in cancer and if providing a diet with any composition before and during treatment is more beneficial than not providing a diet at all.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Newly diagnosed with non-metastatic cancer of the oral cavity, hypopharynx, oropharynx, or larynx
  • Plan to receive definitive radiation treatment at Augusta Victoria Hospital (AVH) in East Jerusalem
  • Age > 18
  • Karnofsky Index of ≥70 %
  • Normal liver and kidney function tests
  • Able to understand and willingly sign a written informed consent document
  • Lives in the West Bank or Gaza
  • Has an oven/microwave and a refrigerator where they are staying
  • Cancer stage 1-4 with no metastasis
  • BMI > 20 kg/m²

Exclusion criteria

  • Those who do not meet the inclusion criteria
  • Have metastatic disease
  • Will receive a palliative treatment
  • On insulin treatment or other diabetic treatment
  • Uncontrolled illness (e.g. active infection, symptomatic CHF, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness)
  • Received previous treatment for another primary cancer
  • Diagnosed with an illness that requires dietary modifications (e.g. renal disease, liver disease, celiac disease, and inflammatory bowel disease)
  • Already consuming a carbohydrate-restricted, high-fat diet
  • On chronic system corticosteroids for any reason (inhaled corticosteroids are allowed);
  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Body mass index (BMI) < 20
  • Will start treatment within <2 weeks from screening day
  • Requires parenteral nutrition

Treatment and study plan

Carbohydrate-restricted, high-fat diet

Behavioral

Diet composition was ~45% fats, ~30% carbohydrates, and ~25% proteins. Calorie needs were provided according to what the Bioelectrical Impedance (BIA) device gave as required to maintain bodyweight.

Sources of macronutrients:

  • Carbohydrates: from whole grains, dairy products, legumes, fruits, and vegetables.
  • Fats: from mono- and polyunsaturated fatty acids, including medium- and long-chain fatty acids.
  • Proteins: plant-based proteins and lean animal-based proteins. All meals were provided to the participants throughout the study period and the diet was provided orally unless the patient was on a feeding tube or a feeding tube is ordered by a physician during the study period. Diet texture was according to patients chewing and swallowing abilities. If the patient is on a feeding tube or intake is insufficient, a formula with similar macronutrient composition + a protein supplement was provided.

Other names: CRHF diet

Regular composition diet

Behavioral

The regular composition diet contained approximately 50-52% carbohydrates, 30% fats, and 18-20% proteins

Primary outcomes

  1. Feasibility measure: Recruitment

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years

    Recruitment will be measured by recording the number of patients screened, included, excluded, dropped-out, and completed the study throughout the study period.

  2. Feasibility measure: Adherence

    Time frame: Throughout the 16.5 week study period (from baseline till the end of study)

    Adherence will be measured by collecting daily food surveys that ask about daily food intake (checking the food items that have been consumed and providing information about any other additional foods that were consumed) as well as completing all study activities which are listed on a checklist.

  3. Feasibility measure: Retention

    Time frame: Throughout 16.5 week study period (from baseline till the end of study)

    Retention will be measured by recording the number of patients included or agreed to participate and completed all study protocol.

  4. Blood Glucose

    Time frame: Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention

    Blood glucose level was measured, recorded, and mentioned whether the level was normal, low, or high.

  5. Complete blood count (CBC)

    Time frame: Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention

    CBC levels were measured, recorded, and mentioned whether levels were normal, low, or high.

  6. Liver function

    Time frame: Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention

    Liver function tests were measured, recorded, and mentioned whether levels were normal, low, or high. These tests were done to assess whether liver function remained normal after consuming the diet or not. That was done by measuring the levels of GOT, GPT, and alkaline phosphatase in the blood and recording whether they were normal or not.

  7. Kidney function

    Time frame: Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention

    Kidney function tests were measured, recorded, and mentioned whether levels were normal, low, or high. These tests were done to assess whether kidney function remained normal after consuming the diet or not. That was done by measuring the levels of BUN, creatinine, and uric acid in the blood and recording whether they were normal or not.

  8. Potassium

    Time frame: Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention

    Potassium level was measured, recorded, and mentioned whether the level was normal, low, or high.

  9. Phosphorus level was measured, recorded, and mentioned whether the level was normal, low, or high.

    Time frame: Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention

    Phosphorus

  10. Magnesium

    Time frame: Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention

    Magnesium level was measured, recorded, and mentioned whether the level was normal, low, or high.

  11. Sodium

    Time frame: Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention

    Sodium level was measured, recorded, and mentioned whether the level was normal, low, or high.

  12. Chloride

    Time frame: Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention

    Chloride level was measured, recorded, and mentioned whether the level was normal, low, or high.

  13. Calcium

    Time frame: Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention

    Calcium level was measured, recorded, and mentioned whether the level was normal, low, or high.

  14. Albumin level

    Time frame: Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention

    Albumin level was measured, recorded, and mentioned whether the level was normal, low, or high.

  15. C-reactive protein (CRP) level

    Time frame: Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention

    CRP level was measured, recorded, and mentioned whether the level was normal, low, or high. High level indicates inflammation.

  16. Total protein level

    Time frame: Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention

    Total protein level was measured, recorded, and mentioned whether the level was normal, low, or high.

  17. Insulin level

    Time frame: Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention

    Insulin level was measured, recorded, and mentioned whether the level was normal, low, or high.

  18. Triglycerides level

    Time frame: Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention

    Triglycerides levels were measured, recorded, and mentioned whether the levels were normal, low, or high.

  19. Total cholesterol level

    Time frame: Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention

    Total cholesterol level was measured, recorded, and mentioned whether the level was normal, low, or high.

  20. LDL-cholesterol level

    Time frame: Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention

    LDL-cholesterol level was measured, recorded, and mentioned whether the level was normal, low, or high.

  21. HDL-cholesterol level

    Time frame: Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention

    HDL-cholesterol level was measured, recorded, and mentioned whether the level was normal, low, or high.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Tumor progression assessment

    Time frame: Throughout 16.5 week study period (from baseline till the end of study)

    Tumor progression was assessed using RECIST and WHO criteria as well as diagnostic CTScan/ PETScan imaging.

  2. Nutritional status assessment

    Time frame: Throughout 16.5 week study period (from baseline till the end of study)

    Nutritional status was assessed using the "Patient generated subjective global assessment" (PG-SGA) tool.

  3. Percentage of body fat

    Time frame: Throughout 16.5 week study period (from baseline till the end of study)

    The percentage of body fat was measured by using a Bioelectric Impedance Analysis (BIA) device and used to study the effect of the intervention on body composition.

  4. Percentage of lean body mass

    Time frame: Throughout 16.5 week study period (from baseline till the end of study)

    The percentage of lean body mass was measured by using a Bioelectric Impedance Analysis (BIA) device and used to study the effect of the intervention on body composition.

  5. Percentage of body water

    Time frame: Throughout 16.5 week study period (from baseline till the end of study)

    The percentage of body water was measured by using a Bioelectric Impedance Analysis (BIA) device and used to study the effect of the intervention on body composition.

  6. Basal metabolic rate (BMR)

    Time frame: Throughout 16.5 week study period (from baseline till the end of study)

    BMR was measured by using a Bioelectric Impedance Analysis (BIA) device and used to study the effect of the intervention on body composition.

  7. Quality of life assessment

    Time frame: Throughout 16.5 week study period (from baseline till the end of study)

    Quality of life was assessed using EORTC QLQ questionnaires.

  8. Symptom burden assessment

    Time frame: Throughout 16.5 week study period (from baseline till the end of study)

    Symptom burden was assessed using the validated Memorial Symptom Assessment Survey.

  9. Hospitalization

    Time frame: Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention

    We recorded whether the participant was hospitalized or not.

  10. Number of hospitalizations

    Time frame: Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention

    If the participant was hospitalized, we recorded the number of hospitalizations

  11. Duration of hospitalization

    Time frame: Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention

    If the participant was hospitalized, we recorded the duration of each hospitalization

  12. Weight loss

    Time frame: Throughout 16.5 week study period (from baseline till the end of study)

    We recorded whether the participant had weight loss or not

  13. Amount and span of weight loss

    Time frame: Throughout 16.5 week study period (from baseline till the end of study)

    If the participant had weight loss, we recorded how much he had lost and during what time span

  14. Treatment dose reduction

    Time frame: Throughout the 6.5 weeks of treatment

    We recorded whether there was treatment dose reduction and the reason for that.

  15. Treatment break

    Time frame: Throughout the 6.5 weeks of treatment

    We recorded whether there was treatment break and the reason for that.

  16. Early cessation of treatment

    Time frame: Throughout the 8.5 weeks of treatment

    We recorded whether there was early cessation of treatment and the reason for that.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Other

Collaborators

  • Augusta Victoria Hospital, East Jerusalem

Registry information

Official study title

Feasibility of a Carbohydrate-restricted, High-fat Diet to Improve Outcomes in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Feeding Trial

Acronym: CRHF

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Feb 5, 2020
Registry last updated
Nov 5, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.