Augusta Victoria Hospital
East Jerusalem, Palestinian Territories
NCT Number: NCT04253808
This study will test the feasibility of a carbohydrate-restricted, high-fat (CRHF) diet intervention in newly diagnosed head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients who will receive definitive radiation.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
East Jerusalem, Palestinian Territories
Our previous observational research indicates that a pretreatment diet high in total carbohydrates is associated with increased risk of all-cause and disease-specific mortality in head and neck cancer. The purpose of this study is to conduct a single-blinded randomized controlled trial to test the feasibility of a carbohydrate-restricted, high-fat (CRHF) diet intervention in newly diagnosed head and neck cell squamous carcinoma (HNSCC) patients who will receive definitive radiation. The secondary aim is to collect preliminary data on the effect of the intervention on tumor progression, nutritional status, body composition, quality of life, and symptom burden.
Thirteen newly diagnosed HNSCC non-metastatic patients were recruited from Augusta Victoria Hospital in East Jerusalem and randomized into one of two arms; a carbohydrate-restricted, high-fat diet arm (arm A) and a regular diet composition arm (Arm B). Arm A (N=6) were provided a CRHF diet both neoadjuvantly (for 2 weeks prior to treatment) and adjuvantly (during treatment with radiation). Arm B (N=7) received standard oncologic treatment including a regular diet (50-52% carbohydrates, 30% fats, and 18-20% proteins). Feasibility outcomes, including recruitment, retention, intervention adherence, and safety were tracked weekly. Biomarkers, tumor progression, nutritional status, body composition, QOL, and symptoms were assessed at baseline, 2-weeks, and 2-3 months post-treatment. A control group (N=26) included HNSCC patients who follow the same applicable eligibility criteria and did not receive any kind of dietary intervention. Medical information were collected retrospectively from the control group patients' files. Information on demographics (age, sex, smoking status, weight, height, marital status, education, occupation, and residency), tumor site, cancer stage, treatment dose reduction, treatment break, early cessation of treatment, hospitalization, symptoms, and weight loss, were collected during treatment from arms A and B and retrospectively from the control group.
This proposed pilot/feasibility study is the first step in determining if a CRHF diet is an effective treatment modality in cancer and if providing a diet with any composition before and during treatment is more beneficial than not providing a diet at all.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Diet composition was ~45% fats, ~30% carbohydrates, and ~25% proteins. Calorie needs were provided according to what the Bioelectrical Impedance (BIA) device gave as required to maintain bodyweight.
Sources of macronutrients:
Other names: CRHF diet
The regular composition diet contained approximately 50-52% carbohydrates, 30% fats, and 18-20% proteins
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years
Recruitment will be measured by recording the number of patients screened, included, excluded, dropped-out, and completed the study throughout the study period.
Time frame: Throughout the 16.5 week study period (from baseline till the end of study)
Adherence will be measured by collecting daily food surveys that ask about daily food intake (checking the food items that have been consumed and providing information about any other additional foods that were consumed) as well as completing all study activities which are listed on a checklist.
Time frame: Throughout 16.5 week study period (from baseline till the end of study)
Retention will be measured by recording the number of patients included or agreed to participate and completed all study protocol.
Time frame: Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention
Blood glucose level was measured, recorded, and mentioned whether the level was normal, low, or high.
Time frame: Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention
CBC levels were measured, recorded, and mentioned whether levels were normal, low, or high.
Time frame: Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention
Liver function tests were measured, recorded, and mentioned whether levels were normal, low, or high. These tests were done to assess whether liver function remained normal after consuming the diet or not. That was done by measuring the levels of GOT, GPT, and alkaline phosphatase in the blood and recording whether they were normal or not.
Time frame: Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention
Kidney function tests were measured, recorded, and mentioned whether levels were normal, low, or high. These tests were done to assess whether kidney function remained normal after consuming the diet or not. That was done by measuring the levels of BUN, creatinine, and uric acid in the blood and recording whether they were normal or not.
Time frame: Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention
Potassium level was measured, recorded, and mentioned whether the level was normal, low, or high.
Time frame: Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention
Phosphorus
Time frame: Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention
Magnesium level was measured, recorded, and mentioned whether the level was normal, low, or high.
Time frame: Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention
Sodium level was measured, recorded, and mentioned whether the level was normal, low, or high.
Time frame: Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention
Chloride level was measured, recorded, and mentioned whether the level was normal, low, or high.
Time frame: Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention
Calcium level was measured, recorded, and mentioned whether the level was normal, low, or high.
Time frame: Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention
Albumin level was measured, recorded, and mentioned whether the level was normal, low, or high.
Time frame: Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention
CRP level was measured, recorded, and mentioned whether the level was normal, low, or high. High level indicates inflammation.
Time frame: Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention
Total protein level was measured, recorded, and mentioned whether the level was normal, low, or high.
Time frame: Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention
Insulin level was measured, recorded, and mentioned whether the level was normal, low, or high.
Time frame: Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention
Triglycerides levels were measured, recorded, and mentioned whether the levels were normal, low, or high.
Time frame: Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention
Total cholesterol level was measured, recorded, and mentioned whether the level was normal, low, or high.
Time frame: Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention
LDL-cholesterol level was measured, recorded, and mentioned whether the level was normal, low, or high.
Time frame: Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention
HDL-cholesterol level was measured, recorded, and mentioned whether the level was normal, low, or high.
Time frame: Throughout 16.5 week study period (from baseline till the end of study)
Tumor progression was assessed using RECIST and WHO criteria as well as diagnostic CTScan/ PETScan imaging.
Time frame: Throughout 16.5 week study period (from baseline till the end of study)
Nutritional status was assessed using the "Patient generated subjective global assessment" (PG-SGA) tool.
Time frame: Throughout 16.5 week study period (from baseline till the end of study)
The percentage of body fat was measured by using a Bioelectric Impedance Analysis (BIA) device and used to study the effect of the intervention on body composition.
Time frame: Throughout 16.5 week study period (from baseline till the end of study)
The percentage of lean body mass was measured by using a Bioelectric Impedance Analysis (BIA) device and used to study the effect of the intervention on body composition.
Time frame: Throughout 16.5 week study period (from baseline till the end of study)
The percentage of body water was measured by using a Bioelectric Impedance Analysis (BIA) device and used to study the effect of the intervention on body composition.
Time frame: Throughout 16.5 week study period (from baseline till the end of study)
BMR was measured by using a Bioelectric Impedance Analysis (BIA) device and used to study the effect of the intervention on body composition.
Time frame: Throughout 16.5 week study period (from baseline till the end of study)
Quality of life was assessed using EORTC QLQ questionnaires.
Time frame: Throughout 16.5 week study period (from baseline till the end of study)
Symptom burden was assessed using the validated Memorial Symptom Assessment Survey.
Time frame: Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention
We recorded whether the participant was hospitalized or not.
Time frame: Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention
If the participant was hospitalized, we recorded the number of hospitalizations
Time frame: Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention
If the participant was hospitalized, we recorded the duration of each hospitalization
Time frame: Throughout 16.5 week study period (from baseline till the end of study)
We recorded whether the participant had weight loss or not
Time frame: Throughout 16.5 week study period (from baseline till the end of study)
If the participant had weight loss, we recorded how much he had lost and during what time span
Time frame: Throughout the 6.5 weeks of treatment
We recorded whether there was treatment dose reduction and the reason for that.
Time frame: Throughout the 6.5 weeks of treatment
We recorded whether there was treatment break and the reason for that.
Time frame: Throughout the 8.5 weeks of treatment
We recorded whether there was early cessation of treatment and the reason for that.
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Other
Feasibility of a Carbohydrate-restricted, High-fat Diet to Improve Outcomes in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Feeding Trial
Acronym: CRHF
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06307093
Carcinoma, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
Istra, Moscow Oblast, Russia
View Trial DetailsNCT07435324
Carcinoma, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
Arkhangelsk, Russia
View Trial DetailsNCT07435311
Carcinoma, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
Barnaul, Russia
View Trial DetailsNCT07682285
Cancer-related Fatigue, Carcinoma
Taipei, Taiwan
View Trial Details