Richmond VA Medical Center, Richmond, VA
Richmond, Virginia, 23249-0001, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Alyssa Huizar
CONTACT
Amanda O Hill
CONTACT
Jessica B Lehosit
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
NCT Number: NCT06028529
Physical therapy approaches for balance and walking deficits in Parkinson's disease (PD) have limited effectiveness, with mostly short-lasting benefits. An exoskeleton is a device that straps to the legs and provides a passive force to assist people to better ambulate. The goal of this study is to establish the feasibility and safety of a lightweight exoskeleton on mobility and fall reduction in people with PD. As most PD patients eventually require assistive mobility devices, the exoskeleton represents a new option for increased, mobility, quality of life, and independence. Qualified subjects will come to the clinic twice weekly for eight weeks (16 total visits) and wear the exoskeleton device while walking under the supervision of a trained kinesiotherapist. Study staff will also interview participants and assess their PD symptoms, quality of life, and overall mobility. This study hopes to establish exoskeletons as modern, standard of care devices, which allow people with PD to maintain more independent and productive lives.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–90 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Richmond, Virginia, 23249-0001, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Alyssa Huizar
CONTACT
Amanda O Hill
CONTACT
Jessica B Lehosit
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Currently, progressive resistance exercise training, high intensity treadmill training, balanced-based perturbation, and standard physical exercises are utilized to treat mobility deficits associated with PD; however, the effectiveness of these therapies is limited. This study proposes to investigate the utility of a portable exoskeleton for people with PD. The goal is to establish the safety of a lightweight portable exoskeleton, the Keeogo, for gait training and to preliminarily assess its potential efficacy for gait mobility and fall reduction. As the vast majority of PD patients eventually require assistive mobility devices, portable exoskeletons represents an avenue for increased, mobility, quality of life, and independence. Robotic-assist gait training (RAGT) has been extensively applied as a remarkable therapeutic modality, such that it is enabling highly motivated people with devastating neurologic injuries to regain independent ambulation. Despite the potential for this technology to transform the lives of people with PD, these devices are not being adequately investigated in people with movement disorders.
To establish preliminary safety and efficiency of the Keeogo exoskeleton for PD patients at various disease stages, the investigators will examine representative subjects in Hohen & Yahr stages II, III, and IV. Inclusion criteria are: 1) PD confirmed by a PADRECC movement disorder specialist using UK Brain Bank Criteria, 2) Modified H&Y stage II-V. Exclusion criteria are: 1) neurological, musculoskeletal, or other disorders unrelated to PD contributing to impairment of stance, gait, balance or coordination, 2) severe CHF, COPD, or those requiring nasal canula O2, 3) history of implantable cardiac device or ablative surgery, 4) moderate to severe cognitive impairment / dementia (Montreal Cognitive Assessment < 17/30), 5) symptomatic orthostatic hypotension with exertion, 6) feeding tube or associated port placement (PEG/J-PEG), 7) body height less than 5'1" or greater than 6'3" 8) body weight greater than 250 pounds, and 9) amputation of any portion of the lower limbs. Subjects will participate in a total of 30 minutes RAGT ambulation with the Keeogo twice per week for 8 weeks (16 sessions). Subjects may opt to utilize a platform rolling walker, rolling walker, bilateral Lofstrand crutches or a unilateral device, such as a cane or Lofstrand crutch, and will be maintained throughout the intervention.
To establish safety, the number and severity of AEs, such as falls, discomfort, skin or musculoskeletal injury, and orthostatic hypotensive episodes will be documented. Intervention efficacy will be measured pre- and post-donning of the Keeogo exoskeleton at bi-weekly intervention visits, and at 3 post-study visits. Walking capacity, including benefits on FoG, will be assessed with the Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT), balance and postural stability with the MiniBest test, and disease severity with the Examination, Part III, of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS). Additional assessments will include surveys about quality of life, activity, balance, and feedback on the device. As a primary end point for establishing efficacy, the 6MWT will be compared between end of training and baseline (with and without the exoskeleton), as well as at 6 and 12 weeks post-study as a durability assessment towards establishing a need for future assessment of in-home usage. These pilot investigations are expected to lay the groundwork for a large multi-center clinical study to establish ground exoskeletons as modern, standard of care devices to aid Veterans and other people with PD and other disabling movement disorders to maintain a more normal and productive life.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
lightweight ground exoskeleton
Other names: Keeogo
Time frame: Through last training visit (weeks 1-8, 16 sessions)
Patients will be continuously supervised by a trained physical therapist and the expectation is that there will be no falls while wearing the device. All primary safety and tolerability measures will be separately assessed with consideration of H&Y staging (2-4; max. 5) and cognition (based on MOCA scores 0 = nl, max. 30).
-Minimal attrition rate based on subjects being unable to complete the protocol. This could for example establish that the Keeogo device is not tolerated by more advanced (H&Y Stage 5) patients, but is acceptable for others.
Time frame: Through last training visit (weeks 1-8, 16 sessions)
The expectation is that there will be minimal attrition rate based on subjects being unable to complete the protocol. In the case of attrition, patients will be interviewed for contributory sources.
Time frame: through last training visit (weeks 1-8, 16 sessions)
Patients will be questioned at the beginning of each session about potential AEs and any AEs observed during sessions by the therapists will be recorded at each training session. The expectation is that there will be no uncorrected and unacceptable AEs as captured by regular structured interviews.
Time frame: through last training visit (weeks 1-8, 16 sessions) and 6- and 12-wks post-training
The suitability of the 6MWT as a future primary clinical outcome measure (and our secondary measures) will be determined from the therapists' impression of ease and reliability of usage and from anticipated trends in scoring improvement. The outcomes here from the 6MWT and secondary measures will be further used towards powering for a future clinical efficacy study, while accounting for preliminary defined influences of severity of PD (H&Y Staging) and cognition (MOCA scoring). Additionally, 6- and 12-weeks post-training assessments will be used to preliminarily assess the durability of training effects.
Time frame: immediate post-training
All subjects will be interviewed for patient satisfaction with wearing and training with the exoskeleton.
Time frame: immediate post-training, 6- and 12-wks post-training
Will assess the suitability of the modified UPDRS Part III (nl = 0, max. 128) as a future secondary clinical outcome measure. Will be collected at baseline and end of training. Additionally, 6- and 12-weeks post-training assessments will be used to preliminarily assess the durability of training effects.
Time frame: immediate post-training, 6- and 12-wks post-training
Will assess suitability as a future secondary clinical outcome measure, focused on balance. Additionally, 6- and 12-weeks post-training assessments will be used to preliminarily assess the durability of training effects.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
VA Office of Research and Development
Fed
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07442747
Basal Ganglia Diseases, Behavior
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07330258
Basal Ganglia Diseases, Brain Diseases
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04799470
Basal Ganglia Diseases, Brain Diseases
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02119611
Basal Ganglia Diseases, Brain Diseases
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details