The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States
NCT Number: NCT06810063
The goals of this study:
1. Determine if a play based test of arm and hand movements is valid and reliable when conducted through telehealth for children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. 2. Measure differences in parent, provider and child engagement when an assessment is conducted in-person compared to via telehealth. 3. Rate caregivers' overall impressions of procedures when an assessment is conducted in-person compared to telehealth.
Participants will attend two visits, one in person and one through telehealth. During each visit, the child will play with common toys. The sessions will be video recorded and scored using two standardized assessments, the Melbourne Assessment-2 (MA-2) and the Assisting Hand Assessment.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
2 year–10 year
All sexes
Observational
Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States
After a child has a stroke, noticeable and lifelong developmental concerns emerge. One side of the body is typically much weaker, often impacting the arm/hand more than the leg/foot, so we focus on the arm/hand. The weakness is like adults with stroke, but in children, stroke impairs play, reaching for/holding toys, communication gestures, and whole-body movement. Because of this, most children with pediatric stroke will receive physical and/or occupational therapy throughout childhood. Traditionally, rehabilitation occurs with the child, caregiver and therapist meeting in person at clinics, homes, or schools. However, telehealth rehabilitation, where the therapist and patient meet virtually through a computer or tablet, has emerged a sustainable and accessible alternative. Telehealth also has the potential to improve access to quality treatments, improve health outcomes and reduce healthcare costs. One problem with telehealth rehabilitation is that few assessments have been validated for use in telehealth. In adults with stroke, researchers have identified several assessments for that work well via telehealth. Similarly, in children with one specific brain disease, researchers found that the results of one commonly used gross motor test are similar when delivered via telehealth compared to in-person. Unfortunately, there is no studied arm/hand assessment for children with stroke. This makes it hard to measure if telehealth rehabilitation changes arm/hand function. This proposal will test two playful arm/hand assessments via telehealth. Investigators will test 35 children (2-10 years old) twice (once in-person and once via telehealth) with the same assessment and compare the results. Investigators will use two well-established assessments, the Melbourne Assessment-2 and the Assisting Hand Assessment. Both assessments will be recorded- via camera (in-person) and secure videoconferencing (telehealth). Those recordings will then be scored by a therapist trained in the Melbourne Assessment and Assisting Hand Assessment. Investigators will compare the results of both assessments to see if the scores match.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants in this study complete two visits to test the agreement of telehealth and in person assessments of arm and hand movement.
Time frame: 1 month
Upper Extremity assessment, range 0-100, higher score indicates better outcomes.
Time frame: 1 month
Upper extremity assessment, range 0-100, higher score indicates better outcomes.
Time frame: immediately after telehealth visit
Evaluate acceptability of telehealth assessment, 4 questions rated on 5-point Likert scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Reported as proportion of items rated at or above 4/5
Time frame: immediately after telehealth visit
Evaluate appropriateness of telehealth assessment, 4 questions rated on 5-point Likert scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Reported as proportion of items rated at or above 4/5
Time frame: immediately after telehealth visit
Evaluate feasibility of telehealth assessment, 4 questions rated on 5-point Likert scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Reported as proportion of items rated at or above 4/5
Ohio State University
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06454656
Brain Damage, Chronic, Brain Diseases
Balrath, Meath, Ireland
View Trial DetailsNCT07247331
Brain Damage, Chronic, Brain Diseases
Isparta, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06040619
Brain Damage, Chronic, Brain Diseases
Frisco, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06048419
Brain Damage, Chronic, Brain Diseases
Frisco, Texas, United States
View Trial Details