The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
NCT Number: NCT04644757
The purpose of this study is to examine the feasibility and acceptability of listening to 20 minutes of preferred style of music twice-daily for 4 consecutive days on pain among 20 community-dwelling older adults with lower back pain (LBP)
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me65 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The study will employ an individual receptive relaxation music method with participants selecting music based on their preference from a selection of various styles from the MUSIC CARE© app. The music intervention will last 20 minutes per session and will be administered twice daily for 4 consecutive days. Participants will be given an electronic tablet with the MUSIC CARE© app loaded on it and trained on how to access the app to select their preferred style of music.Participants will be instructed to use the provided headphone during all interventions and to sit in a quiet area while wearing an ocular mask to avoid distractions.The PI will remotely monitor each of the music intervention sessions in real-time monitoring via a secured video conferencing interface to ensure adherence to study protocol.
Time frame: 6 months from start of study
Time frame: 6 months from start of study
Assessed as number not completing the study divided by number enrolled at baseline
Time frame: 6 months from start of study
Assessed as number completing all measures divided by number enrolled
Time frame: Baseline
Assess perceived acceptability of treatment using TAP in four categories of appropriateness, effectiveness, suitability, and willingness to adhere on a scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much).
Time frame: 5 days after baseline(1 day after completion of intervention)
Assess perceived acceptability of treatment using TAP in four categories of appropriateness, effectiveness, suitability, and willingness to adhere on a scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much).
Time frame: Baseline
Self-reported mean clinical pain intensity defined as the average pain intensity experienced in the past 7 days will be measured using the 101-point NRS where 0 means no pain and 100 means worst imaginable pain.
Time frame: day 1
Self-reported mean clinical pain intensity defined as the average pain intensity experienced in the past 24 hours will be measured using the 101-point NRS where 0 means no pain and 100 means worst imaginable pain.
Time frame: day 2
Self-reported mean clinical pain intensity defined as the average pain intensity experienced in the past 24 hours will be measured using the 101-point NRS where 0 means no pain and 100 means worst imaginable pain.
Time frame: day 3
Self-reported mean clinical pain intensity defined as the average pain intensity experienced in the past 24 hours will be measured using the 101-point NRS where 0 means no pain and 100 means worst imaginable pain.
Time frame: day 4
Self-reported mean clinical pain intensity defined as the average pain intensity experienced in the past 24 hours will be measured using the 101-point NRS where 0 means no pain and 100 means worst imaginable pain.
Time frame: post intervention (day 5)
Self-reported mean clinical pain intensity defined as the average pain intensity experienced in the past 24 hours will be measured using the 101-point NRS where 0 means no pain and 100 means worst imaginable pain.
Time frame: Baseline
The PROMIS Anxiety Short Form has 8 items with each item on the measure being rated on a 5-point scale (1-5) , a higher number indicating a worse outcome
Time frame: Baseline
The PROMIS Depression Short Form has 8 items with each item on the measure being rated on a 5-point scale (1-5) , a higher number indicating a worse outcome
Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention (Day 5)
Pain-related measure of hemodynamic response function will be measured during pressure pain stimulation using a continuous-wave, multichannel fNIRS imaging system (LIGHTNIRS, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) with three semiconductor lasers at 780, 805, and 830 nm.
Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention (Day 5)
Conditioned pain modulation will measure the difference in pressure pain threshold before and after a painful "conditioning stimulus" is applied to test central pain inhibition. The conditioning stimulus will involve the immersion of one hand in a cold-water bath. The pressure pain tolerance will be evaluated following a conditioning stimulus condition
Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention (Day 5)
Heart rate variability will be assessed as an indicates the sympathetic nervous system status using lead II arrangement with an MP160 Data Acquisition Systems (Biopac Systems, Inc., Goleta, CA, U.S.A.).
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Other
Feasibility and Efficacy of Remotely Monitored Home-based Listening to Preferred Music for Pain in Older Adults With Low Back Pain: A Pilot Study of Feasibility and Acceptability
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07062510
Back Pain, Low Back Pain
Taoyuan, Taiwan
View Trial DetailsNCT06404788
Anxiety Disorders, Anxiety Disorders and Symptoms
Katowice, Silesian Voivodeship, Poland
View Trial DetailsNCT07582705
Back Pain, Low Back Ache
Kansas City, Kansas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03765853
Back Pain, Low Back Pain
Marseille, Marseille Cedex, France
View Trial Details