Botswana Harvard AIDS Institute
Gaborone, Botswana
NCT Number: NCT04119154
Prospective feasibility and validation study of a novel, near-to-care modality for diagnosis of malignancy among cancer suspects.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Gaborone, Botswana
Prospective feasibility and validation study of a novel contrast microhalography (CEM) device for diagnosis of malignancy in Botswana. Consenting patients identified by their providers as requiring a fine needle aspirate (FNA) or percutaneous biopsy for assessment for possible lymphoma or breast cancer will undergo standard diagnostic procedure. Concurrently these patients will have additional FNA fluid tested using the portable novel nanosensor-based device (CEM). Diagnosis made from standard anatomic pathology, flow cytometry, and/or cytology will be compared with the diagnosis made using the CEM platform. Assessment of the feasibility and acceptability of the CEM platform will be performed. Assessment of training requirements for CEM platform will be completed.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Fine needle aspirates evaluated by CEM device
Time frame: Day 1, at time of diagnosis
Accuracy (proportion of true positive and true negative out of total number assessed) of CEM in comparison with standard diagnostic approach.
Time frame: Day 1, at time of diagnosis
Accuracy (proportion of true positive and true negative out of total number assessed) of CEM in comparison with standard diagnostic approach.
Time frame: Day 1, at time of diagnosis
Time from diagnostic procedure to knowledge of test result by the treating clinician
Time frame: Day 1, At completion of training
Proportion of personnel of varying laboratory experience and training modalities with proficiency using CEM platform
Time frame: Day 1, at time of diagnosis
Accuracy (proportion of true positive and true negative out of total number non-Hodgkin lymphoma) of CEM in comparison with standard diagnostic approach.
Time frame: Day 1, at time of diagnosis
Accuracy (proportion of true positive and true negative out of total number of invasive breast cancers), compared with standard diagnostic approach, for the molecular subtype diagnosis of invasive breast cancer into estrogen-receptor positive, triple-negative, and other estrogen-receptor negative categories.
Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH)
Other
Acronym: Chedza
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02145559
Breast Diseases, Breast Neoplasms
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02423356
Breast Diseases, Breast Neoplasms
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00036023
Blood Protein Disorders, Breast Diseases
View Trial DetailsNCT00001270
Breast Diseases, Breast Neoplasms
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details