Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04119154

Feasibility and Accuracy of Nanosensor-based Cancer Diagnosis at the Point-of-care (Chedza)

Prospective feasibility and validation study of a novel, near-to-care modality for diagnosis of malignancy among cancer suspects.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Botswana Harvard AIDS Institute

Gaborone, Botswana

About this study

Prospective feasibility and validation study of a novel contrast microhalography (CEM) device for diagnosis of malignancy in Botswana. Consenting patients identified by their providers as requiring a fine needle aspirate (FNA) or percutaneous biopsy for assessment for possible lymphoma or breast cancer will undergo standard diagnostic procedure. Concurrently these patients will have additional FNA fluid tested using the portable novel nanosensor-based device (CEM). Diagnosis made from standard anatomic pathology, flow cytometry, and/or cytology will be compared with the diagnosis made using the CEM platform. Assessment of the feasibility and acceptability of the CEM platform will be performed. Assessment of training requirements for CEM platform will be completed.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Botswana citizen
  • Age 18 years or older
  • Able and willing to provide informed consent
  • Undergoing diagnostic procedure for palpable abnormality (biopsy, node/mass resection, or fine-needle aspirate) for diagnosis of possible lymphoid malignancy or breast cancer

Exclusion criteria

  • Involuntary incarceration (prison, jail, etc.)
  • Procedures involving internal organs or locations expected to have elevated risk of complication
  • Increased risk for severe bleeding as defined as known hemophilia or other bleeding disorder, use of anticoagulants in past week (not including aspirin or other NSAIDS), advanced liver disease, or other condition determined by clinician to significantly increase bleeding risk of procedure
  • Known pregnancy
  • Critical illness as defined by current intensive care admission, hypotension (systolic BP<100mmHg), hypoxemia (O2 saturation <94% on room air), or other condition determined by clinician to significantly decrease physiologic tolerance of procedure
  • Other condition felt by the clinician performing procedure to significantly increase risk of procedure

Treatment and study plan

Contrast Microhalography (CEM)

Diagnostic Test

Fine needle aspirates evaluated by CEM device

Primary outcomes

  1. Accuracy for diagnosis of non-Hodgkin lymphoma

    Time frame: Day 1, at time of diagnosis

    Accuracy (proportion of true positive and true negative out of total number assessed) of CEM in comparison with standard diagnostic approach.

  2. Accuracy for diagnosis of invasive breast cancer

    Time frame: Day 1, at time of diagnosis

    Accuracy (proportion of true positive and true negative out of total number assessed) of CEM in comparison with standard diagnostic approach.

  3. Time to diagnosis

    Time frame: Day 1, at time of diagnosis

    Time from diagnostic procedure to knowledge of test result by the treating clinician

  4. Proficiency in testing using CEM platform

    Time frame: Day 1, At completion of training

    Proportion of personnel of varying laboratory experience and training modalities with proficiency using CEM platform

Secondary outcomes

  1. Accuracy for sub-type diagnosis (aggressive vs. indolent) of non-Hodgkin lymphoma

    Time frame: Day 1, at time of diagnosis

    Accuracy (proportion of true positive and true negative out of total number non-Hodgkin lymphoma) of CEM in comparison with standard diagnostic approach.

  2. Accuracy for molecular subtype diagnosis of invasive breast cancer

    Time frame: Day 1, at time of diagnosis

    Accuracy (proportion of true positive and true negative out of total number of invasive breast cancers), compared with standard diagnostic approach, for the molecular subtype diagnosis of invasive breast cancer into estrogen-receptor positive, triple-negative, and other estrogen-receptor negative categories.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH)

Other

Collaborators

  • Botswana Harvard AIDS Institute Partnership
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Registry information

Acronym: Chedza

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Oct 8, 2019
Registry last updated
May 2, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.