Msunduzi Local Municipality
Pietermaritzburg, KwaZulu-Natal, 3201, South Africa
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Andre Van Rensburg, PhD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Tasneem Kathree, PhD
CONTACT
NCT Number: NCT07339462
Despite commendable progress in developing mental health systems in low-and-middle income countries, critical gaps remain, particularly the development of community-based systems of support for people living with severe mental illness (SMIs). This application will pilot a co-developed health system strengthening intervention programme in a South African district in order to determine its feasibility, appropriateness and limited efficacy in reducing readmission following discharge from acute psychiatric hospitalization. By generating preliminary data on the real-world implementation of a co-developed programme in low-resource contexts in South Africa, this application seeks to build on an existing foundation of research partnerships and local government collaboration to develop a transitional support intervention that could yield significant and tangible impacts on people living with SMIs in low-resource communities.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Pietermaritzburg, KwaZulu-Natal, 3201, South Africa
Location status: Recruiting
Andre Van Rensburg, PhD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Tasneem Kathree, PhD
CONTACT
The development of appropriate and effective community-based care for people living with severe mental illness (SMIs) continues to be a global challenge, especially in low-and-middle income countries (LMICs). A particularly damaging cycle emerges when people with SMIs are admitted to hospital for acute psychiatric treatment, discharged back into community settings without appropriate support, only to be readmitted again due to psychiatric relapse. This "revolving door" phenomenon is a multilevel challenge to mental health systems, including in countries such as South Africa, with little to no formal community-based support systems for people living with SMIs. Several innovative strategies have been developed to address hospital re-admission, while co-development approaches such as human-centred intervention development have shown much promise in generating improved outcomes. The proposed research project aims to explore the feasibility and limited efficacy of a co-developed health system strengthening intervention programme in a South African district in order to determine its feasibility, appropriateness and limited efficacy in reducing readmission following discharge from acute psychiatric hospitalization.
Specifically, a multi-level helath system strengthening intervention programme has been co-developed, which include 1) the improvement of referral processes across healthcare facilties; 2) the implementation of a psychosocial rehabilitation programme across tertiary, secondary and primary healthcare facilities; 3) the implementation of clinical guidelines refresher training for clinicials on primary healthcare level; 4) the implementation of a structured outreach programme by community health workers following discharge; and 5) the implementation of a Household Champion programme to empower households for better support at home. This package will be piloted in a parallel arm feasibility trial in the uMgungundlovu District Municipality in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. We will train registered councellors to deliver psychosocial rehabilitation on primary healthcare level in tandem with nursing staff, train community health workers to work with existing outreach teams to implement the Community Mental Health Education and Detection programme during routine household visits, and will recruit a training and quality improvement team to coordinate, support and mentor training and improvement for the referral pathway and clinician refresher training. Fourty-three people who have been admitted for acute psychiatric reasons will be recruited for each of the two arms. The intervention arm will receive the full intervention package, while the control arm will receive care as usual as well as improved referral and discharge readiness on hospital level. The primary aim is to determine whether enrollment to the full intervention package will reduce the likelihood of people discharged from acute psychiatric hospitalization after 4 months, compared to those in the control group. Secondary measures include the effects of the intervention on service users (in terms of stigma, medication adherence, and recovery) after 4 months; and qualitative measures of feasibility in terms of the acceptability, demand, implementation, practicality, adaptation, integration, and potential for expansion of the intervention. Taken together, the quantitative and qualitative data will provide an indication of the feasibility and limited efficacy of the co-developed intervention package.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Service user inclusion criteria:
Service user exclusion criteria:
Caregiver inclusion criteria
Caregiver exclusion criteria
The intervention is the product of a human-centred design process, involving a range of health system actors. The intervention entails 1) A revised, integrated referral pathway across tertiary, secondary and primary levels of care; 2) A psychosocial rehabilitation programme, introduced to multidisciplinary teams and nursing staff in specialist, regional and district hospitals; 3) A psychosocial rehabilitation programme, introduced to registered counsellors in PHC facilities; 4) Refresher training on management of severe mental health conditions for physicians and nurses in PHC facilities; 5) A community mental health education and detection toolkit and associated training package for community health worker outreach teams; 6) The Household Champion programme, a psychoeducation, empowerment and support programme to improve caregiver capacity for care.
Time frame: From enrollment to 4 months
The proportion of intervention arm participants who have not relapsed and re-hospitalised for an acute psychiatric event within a period of four months since enrolment, compared to control arm participants, as measured by trial monitoring data.
Time frame: Baseline, 4-month follow-up fieldworker-administered questionnaire
The proportion of intervention arm participants who have shown changes in recovery scores, as measured by the Recovery Assessment Scale - Domains and Stages (RAS-DS), following an acute psychiatric event within a period of four months since enrolment, compared to control arm participants.
4-point Likert-type scale: Untrue, A bit untrue, A bit true, Completely true
Hancock N, Scanlan JN, Honey A, Bundy AC, O'Shea K. Recovery Assessment Scale - Domains and Stages (RAS-DS): Its feasibility and outcome measurement capacity. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2015 Jul;49(7):624-33. doi: 10.1177/0004867414564084. Epub 2014 Dec 19. PMID: 25526940; PMCID: PMC4941096.
Time frame: Baseline, 4-month follow-up fieldworker-administered questionnaire
The proportion of intervention arm participants who have shown changes in internalized stigma as measured by the Brief version of the Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness (ISMI) scale, following an acute psychiatric event within a period of four months since enrolment, compared to control arm participants.
4-point Likert-type scale: Strongly disagree, Disagree, Agree, Strongly agree
Matshabane OP, Appelbaum PS, Faure MC, et al. Lessons learned from the translation of the Internalised Stigma of Mental Illness (ISMI) scale into isiXhosa for use with South African Xhosa people with schizophrenia. Transcultural Psychiatry. 2023;0(0). doi:10.1177/13634615231168461
Time frame: Baseline, 4-month follow-up fieldworker-administered questionnaire
The proportion of intervention arm participants who have shown changes in treatment adherence scores as measures by a tailored measure, following an acute psychiatric event within a period of four months since enrolment, compared to control arm participants.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 months
A qualitative measure of the degree to which the MhINT Recovery intervention is deemed acceptable to people receiving the intervention, their caregivers, healthcare workers, managers, and policymakers, after four months of implementation.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 months
A qualitative measure of the degree to which the MhINT Recovery intervention meets the demands of people receiving the intervention, their caregivers, healthcare workers, managers, and policymakers, after four months of implementation.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 months
A qualitative measure describing barriers and facilitators in implementation of the MhINT Recovery intervention, in terms of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) domains (Inner, Outer, Implementation, Innovation, Individual and Implementation), after four months of implementation.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 months
A qualitative measure of the degree to which the MhINT Recovery intervention is deemed to be practical by people receiving the intervention, their caregivers, healthcare workers, managers, and policymakers, after four months of implementation.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 months
A qualitative measure of the degree to which the MhINT Recovery intervention can be adapted to the needs of different subgroups of people receiving the intervention, after four months of implementation.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 months
A qualitative measure of the degree to which the MhINT Recovery intervention is perceived to be integrated with the local health system, after four months of implementation.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 months
A qualitative measure of the perceived potential of the MhINT Recovery intervention to be scaled from trial to routine and sustained service changes for people living with severe mental illness, after four months of implementation.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
André Janse van Rensburg, PhD
CONTACT
Tasneem Kathree, PhD
CONTACT
University of KwaZulu
Other
Feasibility and Acceptability of Critical Time Intervention to Support People With Severe Mental Illness Following Post-acute Hospital Discharge in South Africa
Acronym: MhINT Recovery
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04881084
Behavior, Compassion
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT06498427
Adolescent Well-Being, Mental Disorders
Framingham, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05834309
Behavior, Cognition Disorders
Pamplona, Navarre, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT05160701
Mental Disorders, Mental Disorders, Severe
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details