Eadie Technologies Inc
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3L1N3, Canada
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Brennan Eadie, MD, PhD, FRCSC
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Lynn Murphy
CONTACT
Reann Post, BSc
CONTACT
NCT Number: NCT07063537
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the feasibility of using virtual reality based visual field testing to monitor glaucoma in a clinical setting. This will be done through comparison of a virtual reality (VR) based device to the current gold standard Ziess Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA). The main questions the study aims to answer are:
* Can both devices produce similar results in terms of detecting visual field defects and progression? * Does the stage (early, moderate, advanced) of glaucoma impact results between the two devices?
Participants will perform both a standard and a VR based visual field test at each visit, for a total of 5 visits.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3L1N3, Canada
Location status: Recruiting
Brennan Eadie, MD, PhD, FRCSC
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Lynn Murphy
CONTACT
Reann Post, BSc
CONTACT
The proposed study aims to evaluate the global and pointwise accuracy and reproducibility of a virtual reality (VR) based visual field testing system on a Pico VR platform in direct comparison to the current standard Zeiss Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) in glaucoma patients with various levels of decreased visual field sensitivities. Specifically, we aim to evaluate (1) if both devices produce similar global and pointwise threshold values; (2) the reproducibility of threshold values across the entire tested visual field; (3) whether the stage of glaucoma impacts the accuracy and reproducibility between the two devices; (4) whether scotomas exhibit similar threshold sensitives and reproducibility between the two devices; and (5) differences in reported reliability indices between the two devices.
Each participant will perform visual field testing for both eyes using both the VR visual field system and HFA (order randomized). Five separate sessions (both tests for each patient; both eyes) will be conducted, at least 24 hours apart. Patients will also be asked to fill out a questionnaire to qualitatively evaluate their perception of each visual field test.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Both devices administer a standard visual field test. The Humphrey is the gold standard desk top model and the VR-VF is a virtual reality headset designed to deliver visual field testing
Time frame: Measured during each visual field test on visits 1 through 5 (throughout study completion, average 2 months)
Both the VR visual field and HFA produce threshold light sensitivity values measured in decibels (db) at the same locations in space (e.g., 24-2 protocol with stimuli 6 degrees apart at locations up to 30 degrees from central fixation)
Time frame: Measured during each visual field test on visits 1 through 5 (throughout study completion, average 2 months)
Mean deviation (MD) and pattern standard deviation (PSD) are measurements of global field loss produced by both devices.
Time frame: Measured during each visual field test on visits 1 through 5 (throughout study completion, average 2 months)
Fixation losses, false positives, false negatives are recorded during each visual field test and reflect the reliability of the given test.
Time frame: Measured during each visual field test on visits 1 through 5 (throughout study completion, average 2 months)
Assessed through examination of variation in global indices and point-wise threshold values
Time frame: Questionnaire completed at the end of each testing session, following the completion of both visual field tests (throughout study enrolment, average 2 months)
Patient experience questionnaires will assess the perceived difficulty of performing the test (very difficult, somewhat difficult, neither difficult nor easy, somewhat easy, or very easy), patient comfort during the test (very uncomfortable, somewhat uncomfortable, neutral, somewhat comfortable, or very comfortable), and patient preference between the two devices (conventional visual field test, VR visual field test, or no preference)
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Lynn Murphy
CONTACT
Reann Post, BSc
CONTACT
Nova Scotia Health Authority
Other
Evaluation of the Accuracy and Reproducibility of Visual Field Testing Using a Virtual Reality Head-Mounted Device for Patients With Early, Moderate, and Advanced Glaucoma
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06685211
Eye Diseases, Glaucoma
Palo Alto, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06689696
Eye Diseases, GLAUCOMA 1, OPEN ANGLE, D (Disorder)
Fullerton, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06434155
Eye Diseases, Glaucoma
Asyut, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT04381611
Congenital Abnormalities, Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities
Lausanne, Canton of Vaud, Switzerland
View Trial Details