University Teaching Hospital and Matero Reference Clinic
Lusaka, Zambia
NCT Number: NCT01115335
In this study of neonatal male circumcision (NMC), the investigators will examine acceptability of among parents, feasibility of training providers and implementing services in various clinical settings, and the safety of service provision comparing three different surgical methods: the Gomco; the Plastibell; and the Mogen clamp. This operational study is being conducted to inform the scale up of neonatal male circumcision in Zambia.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeUp to 28 day
Male
Interventional
Phase 4
Lusaka, Zambia
As male circumcision becomes one component of Zambia's plan to prevent the spread of HIV, it is important to understand the acceptability, feasibility, and safety of implementing NMC services in various clinical settings.
In this study, we will examine the acceptability of neonatal male circumcision among parents in several ways. First, we will administer a structured questionnaire on NMC to 1000 consenting parents of newborn boys at a tertiary care institution and 1-2 primary care clinics in Lusaka. All parents approached, regardless of whether or not they complete the survey, will also be offered an opportunity to have their sons circumcised. Uptake will be calculated as the percent of parents approached who consent for their sons to be circumcised. Finally, we will assess parental satisfaction with results of the procedure.
To examine the feasibility of training providers and implementing neonatal male circumcision services in various clinical settings, we will train a group of 15-20 health care providers in three different circumcision methods (Gomco clamp, Mogen clamp, and Plastibell) at 2-3 study sites. We will recruit 600 infants to be circumcised during the training. We will use structured questionnaires and skill assessments to evaluate provider competence after completing the training curriculum, provider preferences among the three circumcision methods, and opinion about how NMC should be scaled up within the existing health care system. We will also document logistical difficulties of scaling up NMC services at the study sites.
Finally, we will examine the safety of implementing NMC by collecting and analyzing data on complications resulting from the different circumcision methods.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Circumcision performed on a male infant within the first month of life, using one of 3 devices
Time frame: 0-6 weeks after the circumcision procedure
Includes intra-operative and post-operative complications such as bleeding, infection, and cosmetic problems
Time frame: Ongoing, over the course of the study (1.5 years)
Defined as % of parents of newborn boys approached during recruitment who consent to having their sons cirucumcised
Time frame: Upon completion of training in NMC
Measure of provider preferences among 3 circumcision devices being compared
Time frame: 6 weeks following the circumcision procedure
Score, between 0 and 100, of each parent's satisfaction with the outcome of the NMC procedure
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Other
Feasibility, Acceptability, and Safety of Neonatal Male Circumcision at the University Teaching Hospital in Lusaka, Zambia and in the Lusaka District in Zambia Using Gomco; Plastibell; and Mogen Methods
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02596282
Neonatal Male Circumcision
View Trial Details