Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07697261

Fatigue in Long COVID

Long COVID affects about 6 in 100 people after a COVID-19 infection. It can cause ongoing problems like ongoing tiredness, muscle pain, and "brain fog." We know very little about which treatments might be helpful for long COVID.

The goal of this trial is to compare two treatments for people with long COVID to try to manage their symptoms. The main question is to assess whether the Lightning Process is effective for people living with long COVID compared to activity pacing. Each person will be placed into one of the two groups randomly (by chance, like flipping a coin). Activity pacing helps people balance rest and daily activities. The Lightning Process teaches ways to change thought patterns and body responses to symptoms. We will include 100 adults with long COVID. Everything will be done online, including filling out surveys about health and daily life. The goal is to find out which approach helps people feel better and improve their daily activities.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

About this study

The COVID-19 pandemic presented an unprecedented global health crisis, affecting millions globally and causing significant health and economic consequences. Although most people recover from acute SARS-CoV-2 infection, a substantial minority, approximately 6 to 15%, develop persistent symptoms that last for months and impair daily function, commonly referred to as post-COVID-19 condition or long COVID. Common symptoms of long COVID include fatigue, myalgia, dyspnea, sleep disturbance, and cognitive dysfunction ("brain fog"). The prevalence of long COVID is difficult to establish because most symptoms are nonspecific and many data sources rely on study designs that cannot confidently attribute symptoms to prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. Despite this uncertainty, converging evidence points to a large global burden, with >65 million people estimated to be living with functional limitations attributed to long COVID. The Lightning Process (LP), is a mind-body training program that is hypothesized to help individuals to develop a conscious influence on their level of functioning, using practical tools such as discussion, gentle movement and meditation-like techniques. Emerging evidence suggests that gradually re-engaging long COVID patients in physical activation and modifying unhelpful beliefs may promote recovery. There are currently no established treatments for long COVID, and patients often use activity pacing to manage their symptoms. The purpose of this trial is to establish the efficacy and safety of LP vs. activity pacing in adults living with long COVID. We hypothesize that in our trial, people randomized to LP will report greater improvement in fatigue compared to those receiving activity pacing. Our trial will enroll people living with long COVID who are motivated and show willingness to change their condition through intervention. The trial will assess whether, among adults living with long COVID (post COVID-19 condition) and persistent, function limiting symptoms, LP improves fatigue and other patient important outcomes, compared to activity pacing.

The primary objective is to assess the effect of LP vs. activity pacing on fatigue among adults with long COVID.

The secondary objectives are to assess the effect of LP vs. activity pacing on

  • Physical functioning
  • Pain severity
  • Post exertional malaise
  • Health related quality of life
  • Somatic symptom severity
  • Functional impairment
  • Respiratory function
  • Adverse events and serious adverse events

Both LP and pacing interventions span 26 weeks. Patients assigned to the LP intervention will complete a brief preparatory phase, then attend three consecutive core sessions. The LP protocol includes two follow-up calls one week apart and a booster call at week 26. Patients assigned to the pacing intervention complete 15 sessions over 24 weeks-four weekly sessions, then sessions every two weeks until week 26.

Participants will complete outcome measures at 6 months, coinciding with the immediate the end of the intervention, and at 9 and 12 months. The post-treatment time point estimates the proximal effect of LP compared to pacing, where contamination is lowest, co-interventions are least likely to diverge across arms, and any harms (e.g., post-exertional worsening) are most plausibly related to the assigned strategy.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • The inclusion criteria for participants are:
  • Adults aged 18 to 65 years
  • Meeting the WHO clinical case definition for long COVID and
  • Self-reported experiencing long COVID symptoms such as fatigue, muscle pain, and brain fog.
  • Reporting a minimum score of ≥35 on the Checklist Individual Strength CIS-fatigue domain.
  • Able to speak and read English
  • Scoring higher in contemplation, action or maintenance scores than the precontemplation phase on the readiness to change questionnaire
  • Provides consent for study participation.
  • Consistent access to an internet-connected device (e.g., smartphone, tablet, laptop) that can facilitate access to the study interventions.

Exclusion criteria

  • The exclusion criteria are:
  • Long COVID participants whose presentation is primarily restricted to anosmia.
  • Participants with Post-Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) or serious organic sequelae of COVID-19, such as structural lung injury attributable to mechanical ventilation or other organ damage requiring ongoing specialist management.
  • Participants who will not be able to attend intervention sessions or follow up visits due to anticipated significant life changes or relocation.
  • Unable to provide informed consent (e.g. cognitive disability, language barrier)
  • Co-morbidities that likely to impair function for as long or longer than long COVID
  • Current participation in psychotherapy, structured physical rehabilitation (e.g., physiotherapy or occupational therapy), or another trial that does not permit co-enrollment.

Treatment and study plan

Lightning Process

Behavioral

LP is a mind body intervention which is delivered over 3 consecutive days to individuals or in groups via video technology. The sessions are approximately 4 hours long. Experienced LP practitioners will deliver the LP intervention remotely and individually. The intervention is comprised of a preparation phase, core sessions, and follow-up. Preparation consists of an audio home-study module (about 4 hours total) and about 1 hour of preparatory coaching by telephone or videoconference in the days to weeks before delivery of the LP intervention to orient participants to the approach and address any questions.

Activity Pacing

Other

Activity Pacing, a self-management strategy that balances activity and rest to manage fatigue, allowing individuals to maintain consistent energy levels throughout the day. The aim of activity pacing is to avoid symptom exacerbations whilst achieving as much as possible with limited energy. Pacing focusses on developing awareness not only of the symptoms but also more subtle indicators that herald a future exacerbation of symptoms (listening to your body) and becoming aware of effect of activity or lack of rest on disability. Senior occupational therapy students will deliver activity pacing remotely and individually by videoconference.

Primary outcomes

  1. Fatigue (Checklist Individual Strength-Fatigue)

    Time frame: 12 months

    The primary outcome will be the mean change in fatigue scores between Lightning Process and activity pacing group at 12 months post randomization. This will be assessed on the fatigue domain of the 8-item Checklist Individual Strength (CIS-fatigue) at 12 months follow-up. The CIS-fatigue domain consists of 8 items with a total score ranging from 8 to 56, with higher scores indicating more severe fatigue.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Respiratory function (Dyspnea-12)

    Time frame: 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months

    Change in respiratory functioning will be assessed with the Dyspnea-12 (D-12) Scale which measures the current level of a patient's breathlessness severity, incorporating both physical and affective aspects, and does not depend on activity limitation. Each item scored from 0-3, for a total score range of 0-36. Higher scores indicate worse dyspnea.

  2. Post Exertional Malaise (De Paul Symptom Questionnaire)

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months

    Change in post exertional malaise (PEM) will be measured using a brief questionnaire derived from De Paul Symptom Questionnaire (DSQ). It is a 5-item self-report tool that evaluates common symptoms of long COVID, including worsening after physical or mental activity, recovery duration and activity intolerance. Each item is scored 0-4 on 5-point Likert scale. A score of ≥2 for frequency and ≥2 for severity on any item suggests PEM.

  3. Daily Pain (Brief Pain Inventory Short Form)

    Time frame: 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months

    Change in pain will be assessed using Brief Pain Inventory short form (BPI-SF). This is a 9-item questionnaire used to evaluate the severity of a patient's pain and the impact of their pain on daily functioning. The BPI-SF evaluates pain severity at its worst, least, and average during the previous week, as well as current pain level, with 0 representing no pain and 10 the worst pain imaginable.

  4. Fatigue (Checklist Individual Strength-Fatigue)

    Time frame: 6 months and 9 months

    Change in fatigue scores will be measured at 6 and 9 months post randomization. This will be assessed on the fatigue domain of the 8-item CIS-fatigue scale at 6 and 9 months follow-up.

  5. Physical function (SF-12)

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months

    Change in physical functioning will be measured using Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) scale, a 12-item questionnaire that assesses physical and mental health status.

  6. Health related quality of life (EuroQol-5 Dimensions)

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months

    Health related quality of life will be measured using the EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) scale that provides a generic measure of health for clinical and economic appraisal. Its a continuous (scale 0-100). Higher scores relate to better health.

  7. Severity of somatic symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-15)

    Time frame: 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months

    Change in somatic symptoms will be measured using Patient Health Questionnaire-15 (PHQ-15) that screens for somatization concerns and monitors symptom severity. Its a continuous (scale 0-30). Higher scores relate to greater somatic symptom severity.

  8. Functional impairment (Work and Social Adjustment Scale)

    Time frame: 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months

    Change in functional impairment will be measured through Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS) scale. Its a 5-item continuous scale (0-40) of functional impairment attributable to an identified problem. Higher scores relate to severely impaired.

  9. Adverse Events (AEs)

    Time frame: Up to 12 months

    To ensure participant safety, adverse events (AEs) will be documented at each follow-up visit.

  10. Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    Time frame: Up to 12 months

    To ensure participant safety, serious adverse events (SAEs) will be documented at each follow-up visit.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Dr. Jason Busse, PhD, Professor

CONTACT

[email protected]

(905) 525-9140

Rozina Thobani, MSc

CONTACT

[email protected]

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

McMaster University

Other

Collaborators

  • Hamilton Academic Health Sciences Organization

Registry information

Official study title

Fatigue in Long COVID Managed With Conservative Care: An International, Randomized Controlled Trial (FALCON Trial)

Acronym: FALCON

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2028
Study completion
2028
First posted
Jul 13, 2026
Registry last updated
Jul 13, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.