Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05533944

Fast-tracking ERCP Learning: Does Training on a Mechanical Simulator Improve Trainee's Clinical Performance?

The hypothesis of this study is that novice trainees who are offered early simulation training in Boškoski-Costamagna ERCP Trainer in addition to routine hands-on training (intervention group) will demonstrate improved clinical outcomes compared to those undergoing routine hands-on ERCP training only (control group).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli

Rome, Italy

About this study

Background: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography comprises one of the most challenging and complex endoscopic procedures with a steep learning curve. Consequently, adequate training is required to reach competence and perform these procedures safely and with efficacy. To avoid exposing patients to performer-related risk factors, as when trainees practice on real clinical situations, interest in simulator-based endoscopy education is growing. Nonetheless, the validity of simulators is mainly based on endoscopists' subjective opinions about their utility and the implementation of simulators in ERCP training programs is still limited. The Boškoski-Costamagna ERCP Trainer is one of the most appreciated simulation prototypes for ERCP training and has already been demonstrated to have a good face and construct validity. This study aims to evaluate the predictive validity of ERCP Trainer by analyzing the effect of simulation training on the basic ERCP skills of novice ERCP endoscopist trainees and assessing whether it offers an additional benefit to standard training in achieving clinical ERCP competence.

Methods: A prospective, multicenter trial, parallel-arm, randomized controlled trial will be conducted during 1 year. Sixteen "novice" Gastroenterology trainees in high-volume training centers will be randomized into two groups: Group A, intervention group (simulation group with ERCP Trainer) and Group B, control group (no simulation training). Both groups will undergo hands-on clinical ERCP training, supervised by local ERCP trainers, in each trainee's respective Institution. In addition, trainees from Group A will have coached simulation training, by participating in three intensive courses during the first three months of training, with a monthly basis, in Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli, Rome. During the clinical training period, clinical performance evaluation will be systematically evaluated in all ERCPs performed with any degree of trainee involvement. After each trainee completes a minimum of 60 ERCPs, data will be pooled and analyzed. Analysis of overall trainee's competence rates measured by the validated overall trainee's competence rate (TEESAT ERCP score, as primary outcome) and success rate of bile duct cannulation and adverse events rate (secondary outcomes) will be performed.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Gastroenterology trainees from European high-volume training ERCP centers who have previously completed basic endoscopy training but are considered to be novice ERCP endoscopists.

Novice ERCP endoscopists are defined as trainees who have achieved competence in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, have participated in fewer than 30 ERCPs (with no hands-on experience in ERCP) and are beginning training in a high-volume ERCP center.

Exclusion criteria

Gastroenterologists with intermediate / advanced expertise in ERCP.

Treatment and study plan

Simulation training in Boškoski-Costamagna ERCP Trainer

Other

Coached simulation training in Boškoski-Costamagna ERCP Trainer, by participating in three intensive courses during the first three months of training, with a monthly basis

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall trainee's competence rate

    Time frame: 6 months to 12 months

    The overall trainee's competence rates will be measured by TEESAT ERCP score, graded by supervisor trainer, and the difference between the simulation training group and control group will be compared.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Bile duct cannulation rate

    Time frame: 6 months to 12 months

    Successful biliary cannulation will be specifically defined as deep placement of a guidewire into the common bile duct with contrast visualization.

  2. Adverse events rate

    Time frame: 6 months to 12 months

    Complications include post-ERCP pancreatitis, perforation, bleeding, cholangitis, death and will be assessed up to 72 hours after the procedure, based on symptoms and signs and laboratory tests. Imaging examinations will be performed, if indicated, to rule out complications. Definition of the complications will be assessed on the basis of published criteria.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Erasme University Hospital

Other

Collaborators

  • Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice
  • Erasmus Medical Center
  • Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
  • Hospital Nord
  • Leiden University Medical Center
  • Maastricht University Medical Center
  • The Mediterranean Institute for Transplantation and Advanced Specialized Therapies
  • Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

Registry information

Official study title

Fast-tracking ERCP Learning: Does Training on a Mechanical Simulator Improve Trainee's Clinical Performance? A Randomized Trial To Evaluate Predictive Validity of Boškoski-Costamagna ERCP Trainer Simulator.

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Sep 9, 2022
Registry last updated
Apr 1, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.