Irinotecan
Drugantineoplastic enzyme inhibitor
NCT Number: NCT04625907
FaR-RMS is an over-arching study for children and adults with newly diagnosed and relapsed rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS)
Interested in participating?
Request InfoAll sexes
Interventional
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Queensland Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
FaR-RMS is an over-arching study for children and adults with newly diagnosed and relapsed rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). It is a multi-arm, multi-stage format, involving several different trial questions. FaR-RMS is intended to be a rolling programme of research with new treatment arms being introduced dependant on emerging data and innovation. This study has multiple aims. It aims to evaluate the impact of new agent regimens in both newly diagnosed and relapsed RMS; whether changing the duration of maintenance therapy affects outcome; and whether changes to dose, extent (in metastatic disease) and timing of radiotherapy improve outcome and quality of life. In addition the study will evaluate risk stratification through the use of PAX-FOXO1 fusion gene status instead of histological subtyping and explore the use of FDG PET-CT response assessment as a prognostic biomarker for outcome following induction chemotherapy.
Newly diagnosed patients should, where possible, be entered into the FaR-RMS study at the time of first diagnosis prior to receiving any chemotherapy. However, patients can enter at the point of radiotherapy or maintenance, and those with relapsed disease can enter the study even if not previously entered at initial diagnosis. Patients may be entered into more than one randomisation/registration, dependant on patient risk group and disease status.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
for study entry - Mandatory at first point of study entry
Phase 1b Dose Finding - IRIVA Inclusion
Exclusion
Frontline chemotherapy randomisation Very High Risk - CT1a Inclusion
a. Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN) for age, unless the patient is known to have Gilbert's syndrome
Exclusion
Frontline chemotherapy randomisation High Risk - CT1b Inclusion
a. Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN) for age, except if the patient is known to have Gilbert's syndrome
Exclusion
Frontline Radiotherapy Note: eligible patients may enter multiple radiotherapy randomisations.
Radiotherapy Inclusion - for all radiotherapy randomisations
Radiotherapy Exclusion - for all radiotherapy randomisations
RT1a Specific Inclusion
RT1b Specific Inclusion
RT1c Specific Inclusion
RT2
Modified Oberlin Prognostic Score (1 point for each adverse factor):
Unfavourable metastatic disease: 2- 4 adverse factors Favourable metastatic disease: 0-1 adverse factors
Maintenance chemotherapy (Very High Risk) - CT2a Inclusion Randomisation must take place during the 12th cycle of maintenance chemotherapy.
a. Patients for whom ifosfamide has been replaced with cyclophosphamide will be eligible
Exclusion
Maintenance chemotherapy (High Risk) - CT2b Randomisation must take place during the 6th cycle of maintenance chemotherapy. Inclusion
Exclusion
CT3 Relapsed Chemotherapy
Inclusion:
Exclusion:
antineoplastic enzyme inhibitor
Antineoplastic agent that is a polypeptide antibiotic
Other names: Dactinomycin
An anthracycline topoisomerase inhibitor isolated from streptpmyces peucetius var. casesius
chemotherapeutic agent chemically related to the nitrogen mustards and is a synthetic analog of cyclophosphamide
anti neoplastic vinca alkaloid agent
vinca alkaloid with a role as an antineoplastic agent
Precursor of an alkylating nitrogen mustard antineoplastic and immunosuppressive agent
oral antineoplastic alkylating agent
Ionising radiation
Oral multi-kinase inhibitor that targets a broad range of angiogenic, stromal and oncogenic kinases, including vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEFGR) 1, 2 and 3, tyrosine kinase with immunoglobulin and epidermal growth factor homology domain 2 (TIE2), platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR), fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFR), c-KIT, RET, RAF-1 and BRAF (wild-type and V600E mutant).
Time frame: From randomisation to first failure event, timeframe 36 months
Failure events are:
Time frame: From randomisation to first failure event, timeframe 36 months
Failure events are:
Time frame: From randomisation to first failure event, timeframe 36 months
Failure events are:
Time frame: From randomisation to first failure event, timeframe 36 months
Failure events are:
Time frame: Time from randomisation to first failure event, timeframe 36 months
Failure events are:
Time frame: Patients will be followed up for a minimum of 6 years from trial entry (or 5 years from end of relapsed trial treatment, whichever comes later). Patients will be followed up for progression and death until the end of trial definition has been met.
To determine whether new systemic therapy regimens improve event free survival in relapsed RMS compared to standard therapy (VIRT) (CT3):
Initial new systemic therapy combination to be tested:
o Regorafenib (R) added to vincristine and irinotecan (VIR) (VIRR)
Time frame: Time from randomisation to first local failure event, timeframe 36 months
A local failure event is relapse or progression of tumour at the primary site at any time even if there has been a prior /concurrent, regional or distant failure
Time frame: Time from randomisation to first local failure event, timeframe 36 months
A local failure event is relapse or progression of tumour at the primary site at any time even if there has been a prior /concurrent, regional or distant failure
Time frame: From first patient first visit in dose finding study until appropriate dose level found, estimated 9 months
Based on tolerability, where tolerability is evaluated through the occurrence of dose limiting toxicity (DLT).
Time frame: From first patient first visit in dose finding study until appropriate dose level
Dose level at which no or one participant experiences a DLT when at least two of three to six participants experience a DLT at the next highest dose.
Time frame: From date of protocol defined treatment until 30 days after the administration of the last treatment
Categorised and graded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events
Time frame: From commencement of treatment until 21 days after the start of cycle 2 (each cycle is 21 days)
Diarrhoea: Grade 3 for >3 days despite loperamide therapy Diarrhoea: Grade 4 despite loperamide therapy. Enterocolitis: Grade 3 or above Ileus: Grade 3 or above for more than 3 days Oral mucositis: Grade 3 above for >3 days despite optimal supportive care Persistent neutropenia or thrombocytopenia leading to delay of start of next course by >7 days; i.e. starting > day 28 Any grade 3 or 4 toxicity resulting in discontinuation of the new combination Any grade 5 toxicity
Time frame: Response assessed after course 3 (63 days) and 6 (126 days)
defined as complete (CR) or partial response (PR) and is clinically defined. Patients who are not assessable for response - e.g. because of early stopping of treatment or death - will be assumed to be non-responders.
Time frame: From registration/randomisation until death/study endpoint
To determine the tolerability of the regimens.
Time frame: From randomisation to death from any cause, assessed for 36 months
Death from any cause
Time frame: From randomisation to death from any cause, assessed for 36 months
Death from any cause
Time frame: From randomisation to death from any cause, assessed for 36 months
Death from any cause
Time frame: From randomisation to death from any cause, assessed for 36 months
Death from any cause
Time frame: From randomisation to death from any cause, assessed for 36 months
Death from any cause
Time frame: From RT1C randomisation to death from any cause, assessed for 36 months
Death from any cause
Time frame: From RT2 randomisation to death from any cause, as assessed for 36 months
Death from any cause
Time frame: Patients will be followed up for a minimum of 6 years from trial entry (or 5 years from end of relapsed trial treatment, whichever comes later). Patients will be followed up for progression and death until the end of trial definition has been met.
To evaluate the anti-tumour activity and effect on overall survival of VIRR when compared to standard therapy
Time frame: From randomisation/registration to death from any cause, assessed for 36 months
Death from any cause
Time frame: Within 120 days from surgery
specific grade 3 and above complications according to CTCAE v 4 and Clavien Dindo scale. Specific wound complications within the same time frame will also be collected
Time frame: Within 120 days from start of radiotherapy
any grade 3 and above event according to CTCAE v 4
Time frame: After 120 days from last local therapy
specific grade 3 and above events according to CTCAE and Clavien-Dindo scale
Time frame: From randomisation to first local and/or regional failure event, assessed for 36 months
A local failure event is relapse or progression of tumour at the primary site at any time even if there has been a prior concurrent local, regional or distant failure. A regional event is relapse or progression of tumour at regional lymph nodes at any time even if there has been a prior distant failure.
Time frame: 4 timepoints: 1) 1 day of start of radiotherapy, 2) at completion of radiotherapy, average 5 weeks after start of radiotherapy, 3) 3 months and 4) 24 months following radiotherapy
will be assessed using Pediatric quality of life questionnaire (PedsQL) for the paediatric population (under 18 years). The minimum score is 0 where quality of life is completely unaffected by the intervention to 4 where quality of life is severely affected.
Time frame: 4 timepoints: 1) 1 day of start of radiotherapy, 2) at completion of radiotherapy, average 5 weeks after start of radiotherapy, 3) 3 months and 4) 24 months following radiotherapy
will be assessed using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Quality of Life Questionnaire 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) for patients 18 years of age and over. The minimum score is 0 where quality of life is completely unaffected by the intervention to 4 where quality of life is severely affected.
Time frame: 3 timepoints: Each Cycle is 28 days. Timepoint 1: Day 0 of cycle 1 (prior to starting treatment), Timepoint 2 day 0 cycle 3, Timepoint 3) day 0 cycle 5
will be assessed using Pediatric quality of life questionnaire (PedsQL) for the paediatric population (under 18 years). The minimum score is 0 where quality of life is completely unaffected by the intervention to 4 where quality of life is severely affected.
Time frame: 3 timepoints: Each Cycle is 28 days. Timepoint 1: Day 0 of cycle 1 (prior to starting treatment), Timepoint 2 day 0 cycle 3, Timepoint 3) day 0 cycle 5
will be assessed using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Quality of Life Questionnaire 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) for patients 18 years of age and over. The minimum score is 0 where quality of life is completely unaffected by the intervention to 4 where quality of life is severely affected.
Time frame: 1 timepoint: Day 8 of cycle 1 (Each Cycle is 28 days)
"Acceptability and Palatability Questionnaire" To evaluate the acceptability and palatability of regorafenib formulations
Time frame: After three cycles of chemotherapy (each cycle is 21 days)
assessed by PERCIST criteria and visual 'Deauville like' criteria
Time frame: From date of randomisation/registration to death from any cause, assessed for 36 months
Failure events are:
Time frame: From date of randomisation/registration to death from any cause, assessed for 36 months
Failure events are:
Time frame: From date of randomisation/registration to first local failure event, assessed for 36 months
A local failure event is relapse or progression of tumour at the primary site at any time even if there has been a prior /concurrent, regional or distant failure
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Bridget Shaw
CONTACT
Emma Gray
CONTACT
University of Birmingham
Other
Acronym: FaR-RMS
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07466316
Myosarcoma, Neoplasms
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06865664
Myosarcoma, Neoplasms
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06796543
Brain Diseases, Brain Neoplasms
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06541262
Ewing Sarcoma, Liposarcoma
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial Details