Aim of the Study
The primary aim of this study is to compare the stone-free rate (SFR) of FANS-assisted flexible ureteroscopy versus suction-assisted mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) in patients with renal stones measuring 2 to 3 cm. Secondary aims include comparing perioperative outcomes, complication rates, length of hospital stay, and patient-reported quality of life between the two treatment modalities.
Patients and Methods Study Design
This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, superiority trial. Patients will be recruited from nine high-volume tertiary referral centers. Participants will be randomized in a 1:1ratio to undergo either FANS-based flexible ureteroscopy or suction mini-PCNL using a computer-generated randomization tables, stratified by each center. Allocation concealment will be maintained using sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes (SNOSE) prepared by an independent person who is not involved in patients' recruitment or treatment. Surgeons and investigators will be blinded to group allocation until the point of intervention.
Ethical Considerations The study protocol will be approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of each participating center. All patients will provide written informed consent before enrollment. The study will be conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.
Patient Evaluation and Recruitment All patients will undergo a standardized preoperative assessment including medical history, physical examination, blood tests (CBC, renal function, coagulation profile), urinalysis, urine culture, and non-contrast CT (NCCT) for stone size, density (HU), and volume assessment. Eligible patients will be screened and enrolled after providing informed consent. Antibiotic prophylaxis will be administered according to European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines.
