Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Berlin, State of Berlin, 13353, Germany
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Christoph U. Correll, MD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Piet E. Adler, M.Sc.
CONTACT
Verena K. Haas, Dr. oec. troph.
CONTACT
NCT Number: NCT06759402
The FIAT study is funded by the Innovationsfonds of the German Ministry of Health via the DLR Project Management Agency. The study will be conducted in up to 21 hospitals across Germany and in collaboration with 10 German public health insurance companies. The primary aim of this study is to compare Family-Based Treatment delivered via telehealth (FBT) with inpatient multimodal therapy (IMT) with respect to treatment outcomes and health economic data. The results of the study will serve as a basis for the decision on the inclusion of FBT in the German S3 guidelines and the future reimbursement of FBT by public health insurances in Germany.
Interested in participating?
Request Info8 year–17 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Berlin, State of Berlin, 13353, Germany
Location status: Recruiting
Christoph U. Correll, MD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Piet E. Adler, M.Sc.
CONTACT
Verena K. Haas, Dr. oec. troph.
CONTACT
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
FBT is an intensive, manualized therapy in which the parents of those affected are closely involved in a resource-oriented manner by FBT-certified therapists. FBT takes place in 3 phases: in phase 1, the parents take responsibility for their child's weight gain. Phase 2 involves the gradual transfer of responsibility for eating back to the patient. Phase 3 focuses on individual issues of the children and adolescents, e.g. catching up on important developmental steps missed due to the illness.
comprehensive, patient-oriented and multidisciplinary approach to address eating disorders following the S3 joint German treatment guidelines in specialized hospitals. Includes individual psychotherapy, family sessions, body-oriented therapy, nutritional counseling, group therapy sessions, relaxation techniques, mindfulness practices, and skills training. Targeted weight gain per week is at least 500g.
Time frame: 12 months
The %mBMI is calcualted based on bodyweight and height, measured by the study team. Change is the difference between the baseline and 12 month %mBMI.
Time frame: At the beginning of the study, at the end of treatment (FBT Arm-average: 10 Months; IMT Arm-average: 4 Months; both up to 12 months), 6 months after baseline and 12 months after baseline.
Measured by the eating disorder examination-questionnaire (EDE-Q). The scores of the EDE-Q are presented on a scale between 0 and 6, where higher scores mean higher presence of symptoms.
Time frame: At the beginning of the study, at the end of treatment (FBT Arm-average: 10 Months; IMT Arm-average: 4 Months; both up to 12 months), 6 months after baseline and 12 months after baseline.
Measured by the compulsive exercise test (CET). Items are rated on a 6-point Likert type scale from 0 (never true) to 5 (always true), with higher scores correspond with stronger symptoms.
Time frame: At the beginning of the study, at the end of treatment (FBT Arm-average: 10 Months; IMT Arm-average: 4 Months; both up to 12 months), 6 months after baseline and 12 months after baseline.
Measured by the Revised Children's Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCADS). Scores are presented between 0 (never) to 3 (always). The total score is converted into a T-score. Higher T-scores indicate higher presence of symptoms.
Time frame: At the beginning of the study, at the end of treatment (FBT Arm-average: 10 Months; IMT Arm-average: 4 Months; both up to 12 months), 6 months after baseline and 12 months after baseline.
Measured by the modified over aggression scale (MOAS) in addition with a set serious adverse events list. Higher scores on the MOAS indicate more severe cases of aggressive behaviors.
Time frame: At the beginning of the study, at the end of treatment (FBT Arm-average: 10 Months; IMT Arm-average: 4 Months; both up to 12 months), 6 months after baseline and 12 months after baseline.
Measured by structural interview.
Time frame: At the beginning of the study, at the end of treatment (FBT Arm-average: 10 Months; IMT Arm-average: 4 Months; both up to 12 months), 6 months after baseline and 12 months after baseline.
Measured by structural interview.
Time frame: At the beginning of the study, at the end of treatment (FBT Arm-average: 10 Months; IMT Arm-average: 4 Months; both up to 12 months), 6 months after baseline and 12 months after baseline.
Measured by the anorexia nervosa stages of change questionnaire (ANSOCQ). Each item can scored between 1 and 5. Higher scores indicate higher levels of motivation.
Time frame: At the beginning of the study, at the end of treatment (FBT Arm-average: 10 Months; IMT Arm-average: 4 Months; both up to 12 months), 6 months after baseline and 12 months after baseline.
One item "On a scale of 1 to 10, how severe would you rate yourself as suffering from anorexia?" where a higher score indicates more insight into the illness.
Time frame: At the beginning of the study, at the end of treatment (FBT Arm-average: 10 Months; IMT Arm-average: 4 Months; both up to 12 months), 6 months after baseline and 12 months after baseline.
Measured by the eating disorder quality of life (EDQOL). Each item can be scored on a 6-point scale ranging from 0 ("never") to 5 ("always"). Higher scores indicate lower quality of life.
Time frame: 6 months after baseline and 12 months after baseline.
Measured by the EQ-5D-Y-5L. Items are scored on 5 levels ("no problems" to "extreme problems") except one, which is scored on a vertical visual analogue scale (endpoints are "the best health you can imagine" and "the worst health you can imagine"). Higher scores indicate more problems.
Time frame: At the beginning of the study, at the end of treatment (FBT Arm-average: 10 Months; IMT Arm-average: 4 Months; both up to 12 months), 6 months after baseline and 12 months after baseline.
Measured by the caregiver strain questionnaire (CGSQ-SF11). Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale (0= not at all, 4= very much). Higher scores indicate greater strain.
Time frame: 6 months after baseline and 12 months after baseline.
Measured by a structured questionnaire about financial strain during treatment. The first question ("Has your child's treatment put a financial strain on you?") is scored on a 4-point Likert scale (1= not at all; 4= extremely). A higher score indicates greater financial strain. The second question ("Have you had any loss of earnings due to your child's illness?") is binary scored (yes/no) and follows up the "yes" condition with the question "how many days were you not able to work?".
Time frame: 6 months after baseline and 12 months after baseline.
Measured by the Client Service Receipt Inventory (CSRI). Assessing the use of various services in the respective units (e.g., days or hours).
Time frame: At the end of treatment (FBT Arm-average: 10 Months; IMT Arm-average: 4 Months; both up to 12 months)
Measured by an adapted version of the treatment satisfaction questionnaire by Lindstedt et al. (2020). The following topics are assessed and scored:
Time frame: At the end of treatment (FBT Arm-average: 10 Months; IMT Arm-average: 4 Months; both up to 12 months)
Measured by an adapted version of the treatment satisfactory questionnaire by Krautter & Lock (2004). The questions assess the subjective effectiveness of the treatment and treatment satisfaction. Items are scored on all topics on a 5-point Likert scale (0= very ineffective; 4= very effective). Higher scores indicate higher effectiveness. Additionally, the following questions are scored on a 5-point Likert scale (0= not at all; 4= yes, totally) :
Time frame: At the end of treatment (FBT Arm-average: 10 Months; IMT Arm-average: 4 Months; both up to 12 months)
Measured by an adapted version of the treatment satisfactory questionnaire by Krautter & Lock (2004). The questions assess the subjective effectiveness of the treatment and treatment satisfaction. Two open questions ("What did you find helpful in this treatment?"; "What did you not find helpful in this treatment?") can be answered via free-text.
Time frame: At the beginning of the study, at the end of treatment (FBT Arm-average: 10 Months; IMT Arm-average: 4 Months; both up to 12 months), 6 months after baseline and 12 months after baseline.
Measured by asking first whether any suicidal thoughts or behaviors were present in the past 28 days (yes/no). The yes condition is followed up by several questions assessing the presence (yes/no) of:
Both children and parents are asked. The children answer for their own thoughts/behaviors, the parents for their child's thoughts/behaviors.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Piet E. Adler, M.Sc.
CONTACT
Verena K. Haas, Dr. oec. troph.
CONTACT
Charite University, Berlin, Germany
Other
Acronym: FIAT
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07726524
Anorexia Nervosa, Anorexia Nervosa Restricting Type
San Francisco, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06593366
Anorexia, Anorexia Nervosa
View Trial DetailsNCT03097874
Anorexia, Anorexia Nervosa
San Francisco, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07600671
Anorexia Nervosa, Binge Eating Disorder
Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States
View Trial Details