IRCCS Burlo Garofolo
Trieste, 34138, Italy
NCT Number: NCT00816387
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of fallopian sperm perfusion (FSP) in comparison with standard intrauterine insemination (IUI) in natural cycle for couples with unexplained infertility or mild male factor.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me24 year–40 year
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
Trieste, 34138, Italy
A number of randomised controlled trials have been published comparing the efficacy of FSP with standard IUI. A recent meta-analysis has suggested that in couples with unexplained infertility Fallopian tube sperm perfusion together with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) leads to increased pregnancy rates than IUI and COH. No study has been published comparing the two insemination techniques in natural cycle.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Patients are treated with fallopian tube sperm perfusion
Other names: Cervical cup
Patients are treated with standard intrauterine insemination
Other names: Balloon catheter
Time frame: 2 years
Time frame: 2 years
Time frame: 2 years
IRCCS Burlo Garofolo
Other
Fallopian Tube Sperm Perfusion (FSP) Versus Intra-uterine Insemination (IUI) in Natural Cycle: a Prospective Randomized Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03549533
Insemination, Artificial
Saint-Etienne, France
View Trial Details