Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00135629

Factors Predicting Efficacy of Allergen Injection Immunotherapy for Grass Pollen Hayfever

The purpose of this study is to determine at which point in the dosing regime grass pollen immunotherapy causes a significant reduction in the late skin response to allergen challenge. A once weekly cluster regimen of 2 injections per visit was employed during the up-dosing phase, followed by monthly maintenance injections of 100,000 SQ units. Symptom scores and need of rescue medication were recorded by patients during the study period. The size of early and late cutaneous response to allergen challenge was recorded and measured by a physician.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Royal Brompton Hospital, NHLI Imperial College

London, SW3 6LY, United Kingdom

About this study

This was a single centre, randomised, double-blind placebo controlled trial of grass pollen injection immunotherapy (Alutard SQ, ALK Abello, Denmark) in adults with severe summer hayfever unresponsive to antihistamines and topical steroids. The main aim was to determine at which point in the dosing regime grass pollen immunotherapy causes a significant reduction in the late skin response to allergen challenge. A once weekly cluster regimen of 2 injections per visit was employed during the up-dosing phase, followed by monthly maintenance injections of 100,000 SQ units. Twelve patients received active treatment (mean age 31, 7 male) whilst 6 were given placebo (mean age 37, 2 male). The 24 hour skin response (size of swelling, (mm)) to intradermal allergen challenge (0.1, 1, 10 BU) was determined on alternate weeks during the 8 week up-dosing phase and then monthly up to 6 months and 3 monthly up to 11-13 months following initiation of treatment.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male and female 18-65 years of age
  • Written informed consent obtained before entering the trial
  • A clinical history of grass pollen induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis of two years or more requiring treatment during the grass pollen season
  • A clinical history of severe rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms (interfering with usual daily activities or sleep), which remain troublesome despite treatment with anti-allergic drugs during the grass pollen season
  • Positive Skin Prick Test (SPT) response (wheal diameter ≥ 3 mm) to Phleum pratense
  • Positive specific IgE against Phleum pratense (≥ IgE Class 2)
  • Physical examination with no clinically relevant findings
  • If pre-menopausal female of childbearing potential, the subject must test negative on standard urine pregnancy test and must be willing to practice appropriate contraceptive methods for the duration of the trial
  • Willingness to comply with this protocol

Exclusion criteria

  • FEV1 < 70% of predicted value
  • A clinical history of symptomatic seasonal allergic rhinitis and/or asthma due to tree pollen or weed pollen adjacent to the start of - and potentially overlapping - the grass pollen season
  • A clinical history of significant symptomatic perennial allergic rhinitis and/or asthma caused by an allergen to which the subject is regularly exposed
  • A clinical history of significant recurrent acute sinusitis (defined as 2 episodes per year for the last two years all of which required antibiotic treatment) or chronic sinusitis
  • At randomisation, current symptoms of, or treatment for, upper respiratory tract infection, acute sinusitis, acute otitis media or other relevant infectious process (serous otitis media is not an exclusion criterion)
  • History of emergency visit or admission for asthma in the previous 12 months
  • Use of an investigational drug within 30 days prior to screening
  • Previous treatment by immunotherapy with grass pollen allergen or any other allergen within the previous 5 years
  • History of anaphylaxis, including anaphylactic food allergy, bee venom anaphylaxis, exercise anaphylaxis or drug induced anaphylaxis
  • History of angioedema
  • Any of the following underlying conditions known or suspected to be present:
  • Cystic fibrosis
  • Malignancy
  • Insulin-dependent diabetes
  • Malabsorption or malnutrition
  • Renal or hepatic insufficiency
  • Chronic infection
  • Drug dependency or alcoholism
  • Ischemic heart disease or angina requiring current daily medication or with any evidence of disease making implementation of the protocol or interpretation of the protocol results difficult or jeopardising the safety of the subject (e.g. clinically significant cardiovascular, serious immunopathologic, immunodeficiency whether acquired or not, hepatic, neurologic, psychiatric, endocrine, or other major systemic disease)
  • Immunosuppressive treatment
  • History of hypersensitivity to the excipients of the trial medications
  • History of allergy, hypersensitivity or intolerance to trial medications or rescue medications
  • A mental condition rendering the subject unable to understand the nature, scope and possible consequences of the trial, and/or evidence of an uncooperative attitude
  • Unlikely to be able to complete the trial, for any reason, or likely to travel for extended periods of time during the grass pollen season

Treatment and study plan

Active injections of alum-adsorbed grass pollen vaccine (Alutard SQ).

Biological

Active injections of alum-adsorbed grass pollen vaccine (Alutard SQ).

Placebo Injection

Other

Placebo Injection

Venepuncture: 100ml blood sample taken on 12 separate visits

Procedure

Venepuncture: 100ml blood sample taken on 12 separate visits

Primary outcomes

  1. Symptom and medication score recorded by subjects

    Time frame: Assessment scores obtained after 12 months of treatment

    Overall assessment of symptoms was recorded on a numeric scale (-3 to +3) by each patient at the end of the study

  2. Adverse events (conjunctival symptoms)

    Time frame: 10 minutes post-conjunctival allergen provocation after 12 months of treatment

    Conjunctival symptoms elicitation with P-pratense allergen (reduced response detection)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Intradermal allergen challenge

    Time frame: Biweekly during up-dosing and then monthly upto 6 months, and up to 12 months following initiation of treatment.

    All patients underwent re-peated venesection and intradermal allergen challenge for testing of early and late skin responses: allergen-induced cytokine production over 10 months (reduced response change to P pratense-specific antigens). Intradermal allergen challenge for testing of early and late skin responses at biweekly intervals during updosing and at monthly intervals during the maintenance phase.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Imperial College London

Other

Collaborators

  • ALK-Abelló A/S

Registry information

Official study title

Factors Predicting Efficacy of Allergen Injection Immunotherapy for Grass Pollen Hayfever: A Pilot Study. (Up-dosing Study)

Important dates

Study start
2002
Primary completion
2008
Study completion
2008
First posted
Aug 26, 2005
Registry last updated
May 16, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.