No intervention
OtherParticipants in this study will not receive any interventions as part of the study.
NCT Number: NCT02909855
This study investigates whether there are psychological predictors of parental perception of side-effects following vaccination with the child flu vaccine. We will also investigate whether the perception of side-effects affects parents' intention to vaccinate their child again in the following flu season, as well as whether there are underlying differences in parents' cognitive biases between those who do and do not re-vaccinate their child.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Albion Street Group Practice, London, United Kingdom
In 2012, the British Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) recommended that the influenza vaccination programme be extended to include children aged 2 to 16. In the three flu seasons in which the child flu immunisation programme has been running (2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16), uptake rates have been low (approximately 40%). Multiple factors are likely to underlie the poor uptake, including thinking the vaccine was unsafe and ineffective and having experienced side-effects related to the vaccine previously.
Although symptoms are commonly reported following vaccinations, their causes are not always straightforward. Although a minority may be directly attributable to the vaccine itself, others may reflect pre-existing or coincidental symptoms that are misattributed to the vaccine. Following vaccination, an expectation that the vaccine causes side-effects may also contribute to parents detecting symptoms in their child that might otherwise have gone unnoticed. Perception of side-effects may also influence the parent's decision to vaccinate their child again in following years.
Other possible factors influencing parents' perception of side-effects and their willingness to vaccinate their child again are their personal health beliefs and their interpretations of the information they are given about vaccination and side-effects. These cognitive processes can be measured objectively using experimental tasks, and can reveal characteristic patterns, or 'cognitive biases' which govern behaviour.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
-
Participants in this study will not receive any interventions as part of the study.
Time frame: October 2016 - March 2017
Using questionnaire materials as a method of assessment
Time frame: October 2016 - March 2017
Using a scale as a method of assessment
Time frame: October 2016 - March 2017
Time frame: January - March 2018
King's College London
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04794829
COVID-19, Coronaviridae Infections
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05447078
Healthy Volunteers, Infections
Jackson, Mississippi, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05397119
Infections, Influenza, Human
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05514002
Infections, Influenza, Human
Tucson, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details