Centre Hospitalier Le Vinatier
Bron, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, 69678, France
NCT Number: NCT05383235
This study aims to compare the emotional processing in sexual offenders against children versus healthy volunteers using an objective electrophysiological measurement (EEG) during a facial emotion stimuli presentation task. Secondary goal is to assess emotion recognition performances in this population and evaluate the impact of various factors on these performances (type of emotion, age and sex of person expressing the emotion, neuropsychological and cognitive abilities of the subjects).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me25 year–55 year
Male
Interventional
Not applicable
Bron, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, 69678, France
Sexual abuse is a major public health issue. Apart from medical care of victims, it appears essential to intervene with sexual offenders for prevention purposes (from primary prevention to avoid a first sexual abuse to secondary and tertiary prevention to avoid recurrence). In order to improve those prevention strategies, further understanding of offenders neuropsychological and cognitive processes is needed.
Facial emotion recognition capacities, that play a major role in social cognition and generation of appropriate social behavior, has been the subject of few studies in sexual offenders. These studies show heterogeneous results and only one of them specifically targets sexual offenders against children. Furthermore, no study has investigated facial emotion recognition in this population with an objective measurement of emotional processing, such as electroencephalographic (EEG) activity. LPP (late positive potential) amplitude, measured in EEG, is a marker of emotional processing and appears to be modified in particular populations (eg. psychopaths) in response to negative visual stimuli compared to positive stimuli.
The investigators aim to determine whether LPP amplitude in response to negative facial expressions is modified in sexual offenders against children compared to healthy volunteers and compared to amplitude in response to positive facial expressions.
Effect of facial emotion characteristics (type of emotion, age and sex of person expressing the emotion) on EEG response will be assessed.
Various neuropsychological and cognitive characteristics (facial emotion recognition, theory of mind, psychopathic traits, childhood trauma, and alexithymia) of patients and controls will also be measured through neuropsychological evaluation and completion of scales and questionnaires, in order to investigate the impact of those factors on facial emotion recognition performances.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
SUBJECTS - Sexual offenders against children:
Exclusion criteria
Healthy controls :
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Other names: Neuropsychological evaluation
Time frame: one day
The facial emotion stimuli presentation task is based on pictures from the Radbout Faces Database (RaFD). It includes pictures of male and female subjects, adults and children expressing positive, neutral or negative emotion.
During the task, cerebral activity will be recorded by EEG to measure amplitude and latency of the LPP (Late Positive Potential).
Time frame: one day
Subjects and controls will be presented with facial emotion stimuli from the Radbout Faces Database (RaFD). It includes pictures of male and female subjects, adults and children expressing positive, neutral or negative emotion.
We will measure recognition abilities (% correct response rate, response time, intensity and valence ratings).
Time frame: one day
validated test for assessment of theory of mind
Time frame: one day
validated scale for assessment of alexithymia Scores vary from 20/100 (low level of alexithymia) to 100/100 (high level of alexithymia)
Time frame: one day
validated checklist for assessment of psychopathy Scores vary from 0/24 (no psychopathic traits) to 24/24 (high level of psychopathic traits)
Time frame: one day
validated questionnaire for assessment of cognitive and affective empathy Affective empathy scores vary from 12/48 (low level of affective empathy) to 48/48 (high level of affective empathy).
Cognitive empathy scores vary from 19/76 (low level of cognitive empathy) to 76/76 (high level of cognitive empathy).
Total empathy scores vary from 31/124 (low level of empathy) to 124/124 (high level of empathy).
Time frame: one day
validated questionnaire for assessment of childhood experience of care and abuse Global parental antipathy scores vary from 20/160 (low level of parental antipathy) to 160/160 (high level of parental antipathy).
Neglect scores vary from 20/160 (low level of neglect) to 160/160 (high level of neglect).
Physical abuses scores vary from 0/8 (no physical abuses) to 8/8 (high level of physical abuses during childhood) Scores of sexual abuse vary from 0 (no sexual abuse) à 7 (serious sexual abuse) Prevalence of psychological abuse vary from 0/34 (no psychological abuse) to 34/34 (multiple psychological abuses) Frequence of psychological abuse vary from 0/102 ( no psychological abuse) to 102/102 (frequent psychological abuse)
Hôpital le Vinatier
Other
Acronym: EMOREC
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07732335
Child Sexual Abuse, Combat Disorders
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06300957
Child Sexual Abuse, Perpetration of Child Sexual Abuse
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06126926
Child Sexual Abuse
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06599983
Child Abuse, Child Maltreatment
Stanghelle, Norway
View Trial Details