Children's National Hospital
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010, United States
NCT Number: NCT04855734
Children with ultra-rare or complex rare diseases are routinely excluded from research studies because of their conditions, creating a health disparity. However, new statistical techniques make it possible to study small samples of heterogeneous populations. We propose to study the palliative care needs of family caregivers of children with ultra-rare diseases and to pilot test a palliative care needs assessment and advance care planning intervention to facilitate discussions about the future medical care choices families are likely to be asked to make for their child.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me1 year–99 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010, United States
A rare disease is a condition affecting fewer than 200,000 persons. Pediatric patients with rare diseases experience high mortality with 30% not living to see their 5th birthday. Families are likely to be asked to make complex medical decisions for their child. Pediatric advance care planning involves preparation and skill development to help make future medical care choices. Children with rare disorders are a heterogeneous group often with co-morbidities, resulting in their exclusion from research, thereby creating a health disparity for this vulnerable population. Available research on families of children with rare diseases lacks scientific rigor. Although desperately needed, there are few empirically validated interventions to address these issues. We propose to close a gap in our knowledge of families' needs for support in a heterogeneous group of children with rare diseases; and to test an advance care planning intervention.
The FAmily CEntered (FACE) pediatric advance care planning intervention, proven successful with cancer and HIV, is adapted to families with children who have rare diseases. Theoretically informed and developed by the PI, Dr. Lyon, and colleagues, the proposed intervention will use Respecting Choices Next Steps Pediatric Advance Care Planning™ for families whose child is unable to participate in health care decision-making. Our consultation with families of children with rare disorders and the National Organization for Rare Disorders (NORD) revealed that basic palliative care needs should be addressed first, before an advance care planning intervention. For the study to be able to meet this request, all families randomized to the intervention will first complete the Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool (CSNAT)© which our investigative team adapted for use in pediatrics. In the CSNAT Approach, facilitators assess caregivers' prioritized palliative care needs and develop Shared Action Plans for palliative care support. Thus, we propose an innovative 3-session FACE-Rare intervention, integrating two evidence-based approaches. We will evaluate FACE-Rare using a scientifically rigorous intent-to-treat, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial design. Family/child pairs or dyads (N=30 dyads) will be randomized to FACE-Rare (CSNAT Sessions 1 & 2 plus Respecting Choices Sessions 3) or control (Treatment As Usual) groups. Both groups will receive palliative care information. All families will complete questionnaires at baseline and 3-months follow-up. Investigators will evaluate the initial efficacy of FACE-Rare on family quality of life (psychological, spiritual). We will estimate how religiousness and caregiver appraisal influence families' quality of life. We will also explore health care utilization by the children during the study and family satisfaction.
If the aims of this pilot trial are achieved, a future, large, multi-site trial will test the full theoretical model to improve care for children with rare diseases and their families through family engaged pediatric Advance Care Planning. The ultimate goal is to minimize suffering and enhance the quality of life of family caregivers of children with rare diseases; and through this process to improve the palliative care of their children.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Child inclusion criteria are
Family caregiver inclusion criteria are:
Exclusion criteria
(1) Family caregiver is actively homicidal, suicidal, or psychotic at the time of enrollment.
The (approximately) weekly 3-session FACE-Rare intervention of approximately 45-60 minutes each is comprised of the CSNAT approach [Sessions 1 & 2] and Respecting Choices [Session 3].
Other names: FACE-Rare Intervention
Time frame: Change from Baseline Anxiety at 3 Months Post-Enrollment
The Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) is a 21-item measure of anxiety rated on a 4-point Likert scale of symptoms over the past week. The BAI has demonstrated reliability and validity to assess anxiety in individuals aged 17-80 years. The BAI has good reliability and validity for family caregivers of seriously ill children. It is a measure of Quality of life: emotional health. Higher scores mean more anxiety symptoms. Total score was used in analysis. Scores range from 0-63.
Time frame: Change from Baseline Spiritual Well-Being at 3 Months Post-Enrollment
Assessed construct of spiritual well-being. Two subscales Meaning/Peace (7 items) and Faith (5 items) and Total score (12 items) were calculated. on a 5-point Likert scale from 0=not at all to 5=very much. Some items are reverse scored. See www.facit.org Meaning/Peace subscale score range from minimum value of 0 to maximum value of 32. Higher scores indicate better meaning/peace. Faith subscale score range from 0 minimum value to maximum value of 16. Higher scores indicate better meaning/peace. Higher scores indicate better spiritual well-being.
Time frame: Change from Baseline ACP Documentation in the Electronic Health Record at 12 weeks Post-Enrollment
Advanced Care Planning (ACP) Documentation in Electronic Health Records (EHR). Score will be present in EHR or absent from EHR. Evidence of any advance care document (yes/no) will count.
Time frame: 12 weeks Post-Enrollment
Score is number of days patient was enrolled in a palliative care program in the 30 days prior to death. Applicable only to patients who have deceased since study enrollment. Used to standardize child healthcare utilization from data abstraction based on retrospective medical chart review. Minimum value is 0 with no maximum. Higher score indicates higher level of healthcare utilization.
Time frame: Change from Baseline to Frequency at 12 weeks Post-Enrollment
Used to standardize child healthcare utilization from data abstraction by the research nurse based on medical chart review in Electronic Health Record. Score is recorded number of inpatient hospital admissions for clinical treatment for the child with a rare disease. Minimum value is 0 with no maximum. Higher score indicates higher level of healthcare utilization. Questions was "Hospitalization in the last 3 months?"
Time frame: 12 weeks Post-Enrollment
Location where the patient was pronounced dead, as reported in their EMR. Applicable only to patients who have deceased since study enrollment. Categories are Inpatient hospice setting, Home with hospice, Home without hospice, Hospital ICU, Hospital-Not ICU, Other, or Unknown. Used to standardize child healthcare utilization from data abstraction based on retrospective medical chart review.
Time frame: Baseline and 3-month follow-up.
Survey responses to: 1. How often do you feel God's presence? On 6-point Likert-scale responses range from every day to never or almost never.
Time frame: Change from Baseline appraisal of Caregiving at 12 weeks Post-Enrollment
The FACQ-PC is a 25-item measure consists of four theoretically derived subscales: (i) caregiver strain, (ii) positive caregiving appraisals, (iii) caregiver distress, and (iv) family well-being. Scores are from 5 = strongly agree to 1 = strongly disagree. We did not calculate a Total score. We only used the 4 subscale scores. On the subscale scores for positive caregiving appraisals and family well-being, higher scores mean better outcomes, i.e. greater positive caregiving appraisals or family well-being. On the subscale scores for caregiver strain and caregiver distress, higher scores mean worse outcomes, i.e. greater caregiver strain or caregiver distress. The FACQ-PC subscale scores were computed by taking the mean of the items (score range 1-5). Some items were reverse scored, depending on how the item is phrased, so that higher scores = higher amount of the subscale being measured. So the minimum value for each subscale is 1 and the maximum value for each subscale is 5.
Time frame: Up to 5 Weeks Post-Enrollment
Visual analogue scale 0-100. "How stressful is it for you to make medical decisions for your child?" 1 item. Higher score means more stress, lower scores mean less stress.
Time frame: Baseline and 3-month follow-up
Responses to survey question 2, How often do you pray privately? 7 point Likert scale ranging from a few times a month to once a day. Higher scores in pray item indicate more prayer.
Time frame: Up to 5 Weeks Post-Baseline
Items for this 13-item assessment of family satisfaction with the intervention were developed using input from the community about the emotional aspects of participation. Items are on a 5-point Likert scale from strongly disagree to strongly agree. 6 items were negative (felt afraid, too much to handle, harmful, angry, sad hurtful) and 7 items were positive (useful, helpful, load off my mind, satisfied, something I needed to do, courageous, worthwhile). Each item was scored separately. Higher score for positive scale was better outcome. Higher score for negative scale was worse outcome. Study-specific process measure to assess adverse events and benefit/burden of participation. 12 items Total.
Time frame: Up to 5 Weeks Post-Baseline
This is a process, not an outcome, measure. The participant is asked to rate how good the facilitator was for each of 4 communication skills on a scale from 0, definitely no, to 5, definitely yes. Higher scores mean better communication. Minimum score was 4. Maximum score was 20. We did not calculate a total score, as this was a process measure to assess the facilitator's communication and to provide feedback to the facilitator.
Time frame: Baseline to 3 month follow-up
Responses to "How often do you go to religious services?" Responses ranged from "once or twice a year" to "more than once a week." Higher scores indicated greater attendance at religious services. Responses were used as a covariate in the initial Generalized linear mixed effect models. Prior research had indicated that this variable moderated quality of life outcomes. Higher scores indicate more attendance at religious services.
Time frame: Baseline and 3 month follow-up
Responses to "To what extent do you consider yourself a religious person?" Responses ranged from "moderately religious" to "not religious at all." Higher scores indicated higher religiousness. Responses were collected as a covariate in the initial Generalized linear mixed effect models. Prior research had indicated that this variable moderated quality of life outcomes. Higher scores in the religious indicate self-perception as a more religious person.
Time frame: Baseline to 3 month outcomes.
Responses to "To What Extent do You Consider Yourself a spiritual person?" Responses ranged from "not spiritual at all" to "very spiritual." Higher score meant more spiritual. Reported are frequency distributions and percentages. A higher score on the spiritual person item indicates self-perception as more spiritual.
Children's National Research Institute
Other
Palliative Care Needs of Children With Rare Diseases and Their Families
Acronym: FACE-Rare
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06466109
Anxiety Disorders, Behavior
Taipei, Taiwan
View Trial DetailsNCT06265103
Brain Diseases, Brain Injuries
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02814747
Disease Attributes, Pathologic Processes
Dijon, France
View Trial DetailsNCT06612333
Disease Attributes, Mental Disorders
Paris, Île-de-France Region, France
View Trial Details