Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00721799

F-18 Fluorothymidine PET Imaging for Early Evaluation of Response to Therapy in Head & Neck Cancer Patients

This is an imaging protocol only, not a therapeutic study.

The primary goal of the proposed study is to examine the utility of a new imaging study, Positron Emission Tomography with F-18 Fluorothymidine (FLT PET), in the early treatment evaluation of head and neck cancer. FLT uptake in the tumor correlates with the rate of cell proliferation. It is therefore hoped that changes in tumor FLT uptake after therapy will reflect change in the number of actively dividing tumor cells and will provide early assessment of treatment response.

Research subjects will undergo one PET scan with FLT. The scan is done prior to any therapeutic intervention (radiation or chemotherapy) can be obtained up to 30 days prior to the start of therapy. The uptake of FLT in the tumor will be analyzed to see if it can be used as a predictor of treatment efficacy and/or outcome.

There is an optional biopsy component to this study. Should the attending physicians (primarily the otolaryngologists) believe that the subject can safely undergo an outpatient biopsy, and the subject agrees, a biopsy is performed. The biopsy will be done within 30 days prior to treatment, similar to FLT PET scans. Tissue from the biopsy will be analyzed for markers of cellular proliferation and these markers will be correlated with the findings of FLT PET scan.

There will be a 2-year clinical follow-up to assess for treatment outcomes, local control, and overall survival.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Mouth Neoplasms Head and Neck Neoplasms Laryngeal Diseases Laryngeal Neoplasms Mouth Diseases Neoplasms Neoplasms by Site Oropharyngeal Neoplasms Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases Otorhinolaryngologic Neoplasms Pharyngeal Diseases Pharyngeal Neoplasms Respiratory Tract Diseases Respiratory Tract Neoplasms Stomatognathic Diseases

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics

Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, United States

About this study

There are approximately 40,000 new cases of head and neck cancer each year in the United States. Approximately two thirds of these patients present with locally advanced disease with either large disease at the primary site and/or spread to regional lymph node levels. Treatment options include surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, usually applied in combination for advanced disease. Despite aggressive treatment, the 5-year survival for locally advanced disease remains poor (overall, approximately 50%). To increase the efficacy of locoregional therapy, different treatment maneuvers are used including increased radiation dose, concurrent use of chemotherapy and radiation therapy and high dose intra-arterial chemotherapy. Unfortunately, the increased intensity of combined treatment also leads to greater treatment related morbidity and mortality. It is currently difficult to predict who will benefit from intensive chemoradiotherapy and who would be most effectively treated with other combinations such as surgery and postoperative radiotherapy.

It is predictable that the most immediate signal of a successful antitumor therapeutic regime will be a decrease in cellular proliferation in the tumor. Therefore, a tracer, which is taken up into and retained in cells as a function of their proliferative activity, should provide rapid information as to the effectiveness of the treatment. FLT is an ideal tracer in this setting as its uptake is a function of thymidine kinase activity. Thymidine kinase activity is an established marker of cellular proliferation. FLT can be imaged with a PET scanner and the FLT uptake in the tumor can be reliably quantified. Preliminary studies including at our institution also confirm accumulation of FLT in untreated head and neck cancers. The objective of our study is to evaluate the utility of FLT PET imaging in predicting the outcome of treatment in terms of locoregional control and disease-free survival in patients (i.e., progression free survival) with head and neck cancer as well as overall survival.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Ability to understand and willingness to sign a written informed consent document.
  • Subject must have histologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.
  • Subject must be scheduled to receive combined chemo-radiotherapy treatment for their standard cancer care. Treatment decisions will be made by the treating otolaryngologist, radiation, and medical oncologists.
  • Male or females ≥ 18 years of age. Squamous cell cancer of the head and neck is exceedingly rare in children and not generally applicable to the pediatric population.
  • Karnofsky greater than or equal to 60% at time of screening.
  • Life expectancy of greater than 6 months.
  • Subject must have normal organ and marrow function (as defined below) within 30 days of study enrollment:
  • leukocytes ≥ 3,000/μL
  • absolute neutrophil count ≥1,500/μL
  • platelets ≥ 100,000/μL
  • total bilirubin ≤ 1.0 mg/dl*
  • Either AST OR ALT ≤ 2.5 X institutional upper limit of normal
  • creatinine ≤ 1.5 x institutional upper limit of normal
  • PT and PTT (if biopsy is to be performed) < 2.0 X upper normal limits
  • The effects of FLT on the developing human fetus are unknown. For this reason, women of child-bearing potential and men must agree to use adequate contraception (hormonal or barrier method of birth control; abstinence) prior to study entry and for the duration of study participation. Should a woman become pregnant or suspect she is pregnant while participating in this study, she should inform her treating physician immediately. A screening urine hCG will be administered in the Nuclear Medicine to women of childbearing potential before each FLT scan and pregnant women will not be accepted as subjects in this study.

Exclusion criteria

  • Subjects who have had chemotherapy or radiotherapy within 4 weeks (6 weeks for nitrosoureas or mitomycin C) prior to entering the study or those who have not recovered from adverse events due to agents administered more than 4 weeks earlier.
  • Subject may not be receiving any other investigational agents.
  • Subject with a Karnofsky score of below 60.
  • Pregnant women are excluded from this study. FLT PET has potential for teratogenic effects. Because there are potentially unknown risks for adverse events in nursing infants secondary to treatment of the mother with FLT, breastfeeding should be discontinued if the mother is imaged with FLT and may not resume for 48 hours after the FLT imaging.
  • Subjects taking nucleoside analog medications such as those used as antiretroviral agents.

Treatment and study plan

18F-Fluorothymidine PET scan

Drug

18F-Fluorothymidine (0.04 - 0.08 mCi / kg to a maximum dose of 5 mCi) administered once intravenously for a positron emission tomography (PET) scan.

Other names: FLT, FLT PET scan

Primary outcomes

  1. Efficacy of Mean Pre-therapy FLT Uptake (SUVmean) in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS)

    Time frame: 36 months

    Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Progression free survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of disease recurrence (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 27 subjects analyzed.

  2. Efficacy of Maximum Pre-therapy FLT Uptake (SUVmax) in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS)

    Time frame: 36 months

    Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Progression free survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of disease recurrence (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 27 subjects analyzed.

  3. Efficacy of Pre-therapy Metabolic Tumor Volume in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS)

    Time frame: 36 months

    Metabolic tumor volume using the FLT PET tracer. Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Progression free survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of disease recurrence (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 27 subjects analyzed.

  4. Efficacy of FLT Flux (K-FLT) Pre-therapy in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS)

    Time frame: 36 months

    Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Progression free survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of disease recurrence (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 27 subjects analyzed. FLT uptake in the tumor is a dynamic process that involves facilitated diffusion in and out of the cell and molecular changes in FLT. The rate, measured in mL/g/min, is a composite of the rate of transport of FLT from blood into the tissue and the transfer from tissue back into the blood, as well as the rate of molecular change of FLT.

  5. Efficacy of the Patlak Influx Rate Constant for FLT (K-Patlak) Pre-therapy in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS)

    Time frame: 36 months

    Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Progression free survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of disease recurrence (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 27 subjects analyzed. The Patlak influx rate, measured in l /min, is the rate of transport of FLT from blood into the tissue as well as the rate of molecular change of FLT, using a Patlak analysis.

  6. Efficacy of Pretherapy Total Lesion Proliferation in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS)

    Time frame: 36 months

    Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Progression free survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of disease recurrence (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 27 subjects analyzed.

  7. Efficacy of Mean Mid-therapy FLT Uptake (SUVmean) in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS)

    Time frame: 36 months

    Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Progression free survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of disease recurrence (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed.

  8. Efficacy of Maximum Mid-therapy FLT Uptake (SUVmax) in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS)

    Time frame: 36 months

    Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Progression free survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of disease recurrence (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed.

  9. Efficacy of FLT Flux (K-FLT) Mid-therapy in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS)

    Time frame: 36 months

    Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Progression free survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of disease recurrence (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed. FLT uptake in the tumor is a dynamic process that involves facilitated diffusion in and out of the cell and molecular changes in FLT. The rate, measured in mL/g/min, is a composite of the rate of transport of FLT from blood into the tissue and the transfer from tissue back into the blood, as well as the rate of molecular change of FLT.

  10. Efficacy of the Patlak Influx Rate Constant for FLT (K-Patlak) Mid-therapy in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS)

    Time frame: 36 months

    Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Progression free survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of disease recurrence (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed. The Patlak influx rate, measured in l /min, is the rate of transport of FLT from blood into the tissue as well as the rate of molecular change of FLT, using a Patlak analysis.

  11. Efficacy of Mid-therapy Total Lesion Proliferation in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS)

    Time frame: 36 months

    Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Progression free survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of disease recurrence (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed.

  12. Efficacy of Percent Change in Mean FLT Uptake (SUVmean) Between Scan 1 & 2 in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS)

    Time frame: 36 months

    Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Progression free survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of disease recurrence (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed.

  13. Efficacy of Percent Change in Maximum FLT Uptake (SUVmax) Between Scans 1 & 2 in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS)

    Time frame: 36 months

    Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Progression free survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of disease recurrence (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed.

  14. Efficacy of Percent Change in FLT Flux (K-FLT) Between Scans 1 & 2 in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS)

    Time frame: 36 months

    Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Progression free survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of disease recurrence (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed.

  15. Efficacy of Percent Change the Patlak Influx Rate Constant for FLT (K-Patlak) Between Scans 1 & 2 in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS)

    Time frame: 36 months

    Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Progression free survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of disease recurrence (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed.

  16. Efficacy of Percent Change in the Total Lesion Proliferation Between Scans 1 & 2 in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS)

    Time frame: 36 months

    Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Progression free survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of disease recurrence (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed.

  17. Efficacy of Mean Pre-therapy FLT Uptake (SUVmean) in Predicting Overall Survival (OS)

    Time frame: 36 months

    Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Overall survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of death from any cause (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 27 subjects analyzed.

  18. Efficacy of Maximum Pre-therapy FLT Uptake (SUVmax) in Predicting Overall Survival (OS)

    Time frame: 36 months

    Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Progression free survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of death from any cause (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 27 subjects analyzed.

  19. Efficacy of Pre-therapy Metabolic Tumor Volume in Predicting Overall Survival (OS)

    Time frame: 36 months

    Metabolic tumor volume using the FLT PET tracer. Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Overall survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of death from any cause (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 27 subjects analyzed.

  20. Efficacy of FLT Flux (K-FLT) Pre-therapy in Predicting Overall Survival (OS)

    Time frame: 36 months

    Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Overall survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of death from any cause (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 27 subjects analyzed. FLT uptake in the tumor is a dynamic process that involves facilitated diffusion in and out of the cell and molecular changes in FLT. The rate K-FLT, measured in mL/g/min, is a composite of the rate of transport of FLT from blood into the tissue and the transfer from tissue back into the blood, as well as the rate of molecular change of FLT.

  21. Efficacy of the Patlak Influx Rate Constant for FLT (K-Patlak) Pre-therapy in Predicting Overall Survival (OS)

    Time frame: 36 months

    Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Overall survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of death from any cause (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 27 subjects analyzed. The Patlak influx rate, measured in l /min, is the rate of transport of FLT from blood into the tissue as well as the rate of molecular change of FLT, using a Patlak analysis.

  22. Efficacy of Pretherapy Total Lesion Proliferation in Predicting Overall Survival (OS)

    Time frame: 36 months

    Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Overall survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of death from any cause (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 27 subjects analyzed.

  23. Efficacy of Mean Mid-therapy FLT Uptake (SUVmean) in Predicting Overall Survival (OS)

    Time frame: 36 months

    Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Overall survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of death from any cause (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed.

  24. Efficacy of Maximum Mid-therapy FLT Uptake (SUVmax) in Predicting Overall Survival (OS)

    Time frame: 36 months

    Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Overall survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of death from any cause (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed.

  25. Efficacy of FLT Flux (K-FLT) Mid-therapy in Predicting Overall Survival (OS).

    Time frame: 36 months

    Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat).Overall survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of death from any cause (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed. FLT uptake in the tumor is a dynamic process that involves facilitated diffusion in and out of the cell and molecular changes in FLT. The rate K-FLT, measured in mL/g/min, is a composite of the rate of transport of FLT from blood into the tissue and the transfer from tissue back into the blood, as well as the rate of molecular change of FLT.

  26. Efficacy of the Patlak Influx Rate Constant for FLT (K-Patlak) Mid-therapy in Predicting Overall Survival (OS)

    Time frame: 36 months

    Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Overall survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of death from any cause (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed. The Patlak influx rate, measured in l /min, is the rate of transport of FLT from blood into the tissue as well as the rate of molecular change of FLT, using a Patlak analysis.

  27. Efficacy of Mid-therapy Total Lesion Proliferation in Predicting Overall Survival (OS)

    Time frame: 36 months

    Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Overall survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of death from any cause (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed.

  28. Efficacy of Percent Change in Mean FLT Uptake (SUVmean) in Predicting Overall Survival (OS)

    Time frame: 36 months

    Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Overall survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of death from any cause (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed.

  29. Efficacy of Percent Change in Maximum FLT Uptake (SUVmax) in Predicting Overall Survival (OS)

    Time frame: 36 months

    Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Overall survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of death from any cause (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed.

  30. Efficacy of Percent Change in FLT Flux (K-FLT) in Predicting Overall Survival (OS)

    Time frame: 36 months

    Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Overall survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of death from any cause (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed.

  31. Efficacy of Percent Change the Patlak Influx Rate Constant for FLT (K-Patlak) in Predicting Overall Survival (OS)

    Time frame: 36 months

    Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Overall survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of death from any cause (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed.

  32. Efficacy of Percent Change in the Total Lesion Proliferation in Predicting Overall Survival (OS)

    Time frame: 36 months

    Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Overall survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of death from any cause (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Iowa

Other

Collaborators

  • National Cancer Institute (NCI)
  • National Institutes of Health (NIH)

Registry information

Official study title

F-18 Fluorothymidine (FLT) PET Imaging for Early Evaluation of Response to Chemoradiation Therapy in Patients With Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC)

Important dates

Study start
2008
Primary completion
2014
Study completion
2014
First posted
Jul 24, 2008
Registry last updated
Aug 6, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.