OLVG
Amsterdam, 1091AC, Netherlands
NCT Number: NCT06961253
This study aims to externally validate ten existing prediction models with a low risk of bias for 30-day mortality following hip fracture. Data will be collected from the Dutch Hip Fracture Audit (DHFA) and supplemented with structured and unstructured data extracted through text mining using CTcue. Approximately 35 clinical variables will be used, including factors consistently associated with short-term mortality. The primary outcome is all-cause mortality within 30 days after hip fracture. Predictive performance will be assessed through discrimination (AUC), explained variance (R²), and calibration analysis. Clinical usefulness will be evaluated using Net Benefit and Decision Curve Analysis. This study seeks to identify models with strong predictive performance and practical applicability to support shared decision-making between clinicians and patients.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Amsterdam, 1091AC, Netherlands
Hip fractures are a major health concern, especially among older adults, and are associated with substantial morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. While surgical intervention is standard practice for most patients, a growing number of cases require careful consideration of operative versus non-operative management based on individual risk profiles and patient preferences.
Several prediction models have been developed to estimate the risk of short-term mortality after hip fracture, but many have shown only moderate predictive performance or lacked clinical applicability. In 2024, a systematic review identified ten models with a low risk of bias, based on methodological criteria such as adequate sample size, proper handling of missing data, internal validation, and assessment of calibration.
This study aims to externally validate these ten prediction models using data from the Dutch Hip Fracture Audit (DHFA) combined with additional structured and unstructured clinical information extracted through CTcue, a text-mining software tool. Approximately 35 variables, including key preoperative factors such as age, sex, ASA score, institutionalization, and metastatic cancer, will be analyzed. Missing data will be addressed through multiple imputation.
The primary outcome is 30-day all-cause mortality following a hip fracture. Validation of the models will involve evaluation of predictive performance through discrimination (area under the curve [AUC]), explained variance (R²), and calibration curves. The DeLong test will be used to statistically compare model AUCs. Clinical usefulness will be assessed by calculating Net Benefit and conducting Decision Curve Analysis.
By rigorously validating these models in a large, real-world cohort, the study aims to identify which models offer both strong predictive accuracy and practical feasibility for supporting shared decision-making between clinicians and patients.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: 30 days post-fracture
Occurrence of death from any cause within 30 days following hip fracture diagnosis or hospital admission. Mortality status (yes/no) will be determined based on hospital records and confirmed via the Dutch national population registry (Basisregistratie Personen, BRP).
Time frame: 30 days post-fracture
Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC) for each prediction model, measuring the ability to distinguish between patients who die and those who survive within 30 days post-fracture.
Time frame: 30 days post-fracture
Proportion of variance in 30-day mortality explained by each prediction model, assessed using pseudo R² statistics.
Time frame: 30 days post-fracture
Assessment of calibration for each model by plotting predicted versus observed 30-day mortality risks, including calibration curves and statistical calibration slopes/intercepts.
Time frame: 30 days post-fracture
Statistical comparison of AUCs between prediction models using the DeLong test to evaluate significant differences in discriminative performance.
Time frame: 30 days post-fracture
Evaluation of the clinical usefulness of each model through Net Benefit calculation and Decision Curve Analysis, to assess potential impact on shared decision-making.
JointResearch
Other
External Validation of Ten Prediction Models With Low Risk of Bias for 30-day Mortality Following Hip Fracture: A Focus on Predictive Performance and Clinical Applicability
Acronym: PROTECT
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07102732
Femoral Fractures, Fractures, Bone
Istanbul, Ataşehir, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07709377
Elderly, Femoral Fractures
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT06146205
Femoral Fractures, Femoral Neck Fracture
Oslo, Norway
View Trial DetailsNCT05102760
Femoral Fractures, Fractures, Bone
Brooklyn, New York, United States
View Trial Details