Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04417920

Express Implant Versus Trabeculectomy After Late Failure Trabeculectomy

To compare between outcome of Express implant and subscleral trabeculectomy (SST) in management of glaucoma after previous trabeculectomy with a fibrotic bleb.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

42 year–55 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Tharwat Mokbel

Al Mansurah, AlDakahlia, 35511, Egypt

About this study

Trabeculectomy is the main glaucoma surgery. Despite the good decline in intraocular pressure (IOP) that occur rapidly after the procedure, there is still failure occurring due to progressive subconjunctival fibrosis, with associated increased IOP.

If the bleb is revived by needling with adjunctive 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and mitomycin C (MMC) that used intraoperatively for the majority of these cases , the associated rise in IOP was controlled if the revision occured early within the first three months after surgery. But less success occurred if the bleb revision was delayed.

If these interventions fail, alternative approaches include new augmented trabeculectomy or aqueous shunt implantation.

Express shunt allows aqueous to pass from anterior chamber to subconjunctival space like trabeculectomy .Express shunt is a non valved shunt, It has an advantage of less traumatic, less complications, low diffuse bleb and high success rate.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) with fibrotic bleb despite previous SST since more than 4 months
  • follow up 12mo after the second surgery

Exclusion criteria

  • SST failure other than fibrotic bleb were also excluded
  • follow up less than 4mo after the first surgery, and those less than 12mo after the second surgery

Treatment and study plan

Express implant device

Procedure

Operative technique in group I (Express implant) was as in group II (trabeculectomy) except with no sclerectomy or peripheral iridectomy , the steps included conjunctival peritomy superior-temporally away from the site of the fibrotic bleb at 12 o'clock, placed on the episclera under the conjunctiva and Tenon's capsule for a contact time of 3 minutes, ,triangular scleral flap , scleral dissection forward to the clear cornea to allow exposure of scleral spur then creation of a pilot hole is fashioned using a sapphire blade (Alcon laboratories,USA) then Express shunt 3 mm long device and external diameter 400 microns was implanted followed by closure of scleral flap and conjunctiva.

While in group II, Trabeculectomy with Mitomycin-C was done in superior-temporal region away from the fibrotic bleb at 12 o, clock.

Other names: Trabeculectomy with Mitomycin-C

Primary outcomes

  1. change of intra ocular pressure (IOP)

    Time frame: one year follow up

    IOP measured with Goldmann applanation tonometry:

    Complete success in IOP considered as IOP less than 20 mmHg without treatment and a qualified success in IOP considered as IOP less than 20 mmHg with medical treatment and a failure in IOP control considered if IOP more than or equal 20 mmHg after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Visual acuity changes by Decimal

    Time frame: one year follow up

    glaucoma changes follow up

  2. Glaucomatous visual field (VF) changes in median deviation by decibels (dB)

    Time frame: one year follow up

    glaucoma changes follow up

  3. Changes in optic Cup-to-Disc ratio by Volk+90 non-contact lens

    Time frame: one year follow up

    glaucoma changes follow up

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Menoufia University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Express Implant Versus Trabeculectomy in a Fibrotic Bleb With Late Failure After Previous Trabeculectomy

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2020
First posted
Jun 5, 2020
Registry last updated
Jun 5, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.