Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02252666

Exploring the Use of Non-invasive Neuromodulation Combined With Exercise in People With Advanced Multiple Sclerosis (MS)

The investigators hypothesis is that electrical stimulation to the tongue that directly stimulates two cranial nerve nuclei (Trigeminal and Facial Nerve Nuclei), will excite neural impulses to the brainstem and cerebellum. The investigators call this cranial nerve non-invasive neuromodulation (CN-NINM). The activation of these structures induces neuroplasticity when combined with specific physical exercises, can reduce symptoms of advanced MS, targeting primarily postural stability (sitting and standing), upper extremity movement, and ability to perform self-transfers.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Multiple Sclerosis Autoimmune Diseases Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System Demyelinating Autoimmune Diseases, CNS Demyelinating Diseases Immune System Diseases Nervous System Diseases

Age range

18 year–90 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

TCNL, 455 Science Drive, Suite 165

Madison, Wisconsin, 53711, United States

About this study

The intervention will be similar to that used in the investigators previous work with movement disorders, and will be tailored to the address issues unique to individuals with advanced MS.

The study will enroll a total of 6 subjects having advanced MS that present with significant seated and standing balance, posture, or movement control deficits due to MS.

Subjects will complete twice-daily lab training for two weeks (5 days/week). Each lab training (morning and afternoon) includes 1.5 to 2 hours of instruction in balance, posture and gait activities; therapeutic exercise for isolated muscle control; transfer training; and relaxation training.

Activities are performed in 20-minute sessions with concomitant electrical stimulation of the tongue. The intervention is customized according to each subject's particular symptoms and tolerance. If a subject is not able to perform this amount of training, the training will be adapted to a level that is tolerable.

After these 2 weeks, subjects will continue to perform these same intervention activities at home for 4 weeks. They will return to the lab for 1 week of training and testing, then perform home training for 4 weeks. This cycle is repeated for a total of 5 cycles.

After the 6 months have been completed, subjects may choose to participate in an optional second phase of the study. The second phase includes an additional 12 months of participation in which subjects perform the intervention activities at home training and return to the lab on time per month for 2 hours of testing and 2 hours of training.

If successful, this study would indicate that CN-NINM intervention may reduce the symptoms of advanced MS.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects must be age 18 or older.
  • Subjects will have a score between 6.5 to 7.5 on the Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). The EDSS is a method of quantifying disability in people with multiple sclerosis.
  • Score of 6.5: needs constant bilateral support to walk 20 meters without resting.
  • Score of 7.0: unable to walk beyond five meters even with aid, and is essentially restricted to a wheelchair; wheels self and transfers alone, and is active in wheelchair about 12 hours a day.
  • Score of 7.5: unable to take more than a few steps and is restricted to wheelchair, and may need aid to transfer; wheels self, but may require a motorized chair for a full day's activities.
  • Subjects will have reached a plateau in an MS focused physical rehabilitation program in the 6 months prior to enrollment.
  • Requiring prior physical therapy will ensure that subjects have a core level of function that will allow them to participate in the study.
  • Requiring that subjects have reached a plateau will ensure that subjects' response to the intervention is due to the use of the device and not to the physical exercises alone.
  • Subjects who have participated in a physical rehabilitation program demonstrate that they are willing and able to commit to a rigorous training regimen.
  • Subjects will have a maximum score of 20 on the Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS). The TIS assesses static dynamic sitting balance and trunk coordination in a sitting position. A score of 20 or lower indicates that their ability to adequately maintain sitting posture is affected.
  • Subjects may have upper extremity involvement.
  • Subjects may have additional symptoms of nystagmus, dysarthria, sensory disturbance, pain, and/or bowel and bladder function. As they present, we will use appropriate assessments at baseline and successive study test points.
  • Subjects are their own legal guardians, and are able to understand and give informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Subjects will have no major co-morbidities, especially neurological disorders, uncontrolled pain, hypertension or diabetes. All subjects, if on medications, will not have had any major changes in type or dosage in within 3 months of enrollment. Additionally, candidates will be excluded if they:

  • have Functional Systems Scores (FSS) 4 or greater for pyramidal, cerebellar, brainstem, and sensory functions; 3 or greater for bowel and bladder function; and 2 or greater for cerebral function;
  • are able to walk independently;
  • use tobacco products (these activities tend to reduce tactile sensitivity in the oral cavity);
  • have any oral abrasions, cuts, cold sores, piercings, tissue inflammation, or have had oral surgery within the previous 3 months;
  • have a pacemaker, or are identified as at-risk for cardiovascular events;
  • have a history of seizures;
  • have a communicable disease;
  • have a biomechanical prosthetic;
  • are females who are pregnant.

Treatment and study plan

Neuromodulation Rehabilitation

Device

CN-NINM uses sequenced patterns of electrical stimulation on the tongue. Our hypothesis is that CN-NINM induces neuroplasticity by noninvasive stimulation of two major cranial nerves: trigeminal, CN-V, and facial, CN-VII.

Other names: Cranial Nerve Non-invasive Neuromodulation (CN-NINM), Portable Neuromodulation Stimulator (PoNS)

Primary outcomes

  1. Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS)

    Time frame: Change from Baseline at 2, 6, 11, 16, and 21 weeks

    Static and dynamic sitting balance and trunk coordination are evaluated by a clinician. It is scored on a scale from 0-23, where the higher the score, the more improved the balance. Effect size is reported (quantified difference between baseline and time point). The larger the absolute value, the stronger the effect. Cohen's guidelines for social sciences indicate 0.10 as a "small" effect size, 0.30 as a "medium" effect size, and 0.50 as a "large" effect size.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Static Standing Balance Test

    Time frame: Change from Baseline at 2, 6, 11, 16, 21 and 27 weeks

    Clinician measures standing balance for up to 30 seconds in each of 5 conditions: feet 10 cm apart, feet together, stride stance, tandem stance, and single leg stance with eyes open and eyes closed. Total score is the sum of all 5 conditions. Higher scores indicate better balance. Performance-based and tested in participants who possessed the ability to perform the assessment. Effect size is reported (quantified difference between baseline and time point). The larger the absolute value, the stronger the effect. Cohen's guidelines for social sciences indicate 0.10 as a "small" effect size, 0.30 as a "medium" effect size, and 0.50 as a "large" effect size.

  2. Impact of Visual Impairment Scale (IVIS)

    Time frame: Change from Baseline at 2, 6, 11, 16, and 21 weeks

    A 5-item self-report questionnaire that assesses the extent to which various activities dependent upon vision are affected by MS-related visual problems. Scores range from 0-15, with higher scores indicating a greater impact of visual problems on daily activities. Effect size is reported (quantified difference between baseline and time point). The larger the absolute value, the stronger the effect. Cohen's guidelines for social sciences indicate 0.10 as a "small" effect size, 0.30 as a "medium" effect size, and 0.50 as a "large" effect size.

  3. Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Pain Effects Scale (PES)

    Time frame: Change from Baseline at 2, 6, 11, 16, and 21 weeks

    A self-report scale that assesses the ways in which pain and unpleasant sensation interfere with mood, ability to walk or move, sleep, work, recreation, and enjoyment of life. This assessment is used for subjects who have pain. Scores can range from 6-30. Items are scaled so that higher scores indicate a greater impact of pain on a patient's mood and behavior. Symptom specific test, only used for participants who presented symptom. Effect size is reported (quantified difference between baseline and time point). The larger the absolute value, the stronger the effect. Cohen's guidelines for social sciences indicate 0.10 as a "small" effect size, 0.30 as a "medium" effect size, and 0.50 as a "large" effect size.

  4. Bladder Control Scale (BLCS)

    Time frame: Change from Baseline at 2, 6, 11, 16, 21 and 27 weeks

    A 4-item self-report scale to evaluate the impact of bladder control on lifestyle. This assessment is used for subjects with bladder issues. Scores can range from 0-22, with higher scores indicating greater bladder control problems. Symptom specific test, only used for participants who presented symptom. Effect size is reported (quantified difference between baseline and time point). The larger the absolute value, the stronger the effect. Cohen's guidelines for social sciences indicate 0.10 as a "small" effect size, 0.30 as a "medium" effect size, and 0.50 as a "large" effect size.

  5. Bowel Control Scale (BWCS)

    Time frame: Change from Baseline at 2, 6, 11, 16, 21 and 27 weeks

    A 5-item self-report scale to evaluate the impact of bowel control on lifestyle. This assessment is used for subjects with bowel issues. Scores can range from 0-26, with higher scores indicating greater bowel control problems. Symptom specific test, only used for participants who presented symptom. Effect size is reported (quantified difference between baseline and time point). The larger the absolute value, the stronger the effect. Cohen's guidelines for social sciences indicate 0.10 as a "small" effect size, 0.30 as a "medium" effect size, and 0.50 as a "large" effect size.

  6. Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS)

    Time frame: Change from Baseline at 2, 6, 11, 16, 21 and 27 weeks

    A brief, clinician-administered test that helps determine the neuropsychological status of adults who have neurologic injury or disease such as dementia, head injury, and stroke. This tool consists of a battery of tests. Raw scores are transformed to a 0-120 scale, with a higher score indicating higher function. Effect size is reported (quantified difference between baseline and time point). The larger the absolute value, the stronger the effect. Cohen's guidelines for social sciences indicate 0.10 as a "small" effect size, 0.30 as a "medium" effect size, and 0.50 as a "large" effect size.

  7. Walking Distance

    Time frame: Change from Baseline at 2, 6, 11, 16, 21 and 27 weeks

    Clinician measures how far the individual can walk until fatigue requires him/her to stop. Longer distances demonstrate improvement. Performance-based and tested in participants who possessed the ability to perform the assessment. Effect size is reported (quantified difference between baseline and time point). The larger the absolute value, the stronger the effect. Cohen's guidelines for social sciences indicate 0.10 as a "small" effect size, 0.30 as a "medium" effect size, and 0.50 as a "large" effect size.

  8. Walking Speed

    Time frame: Change from Baseline at 2, 6, 11, 16, 21 and 27 weeks

    Assessed by timing the first 25 feet that the person walked. Performance-based and tested in participants who possessed the ability to perform the assessment. Effect size is reported (quantified difference between baseline and time point). The larger the absolute value, the stronger the effect. Cohen's guidelines for social sciences indicate 0.10 as a "small" effect size, 0.30 as a "medium" effect size, and 0.50 as a "large" effect size.

  9. 12-item MS Walking Scale (MSWS-12)

    Time frame: Change from Baseline at 2, 6, 11, 16, 21 and 27 weeks

    A 12-item self-report measure of the impact of MS on a person's walking. Raw scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale. A reduction in score indicates improvement. Effect size is reported (quantified difference between baseline and time point). The larger the absolute value, the stronger the effect. Cohen's guidelines for social sciences indicate 0.10 as a "small" effect size, 0.30 as a "medium" effect size, and 0.50 as a "large" effect size.

  10. Box & Blocks (B&B) Assessment - Right

    Time frame: Change from Baseline at 2, 6, 11, 16, 21 and 27 weeks

    A standardized clinical assessment of gross upper limb dexterity. Subjects move small blocks from one side of a box to the other within a time period (one minute). Each side is tested separately. The score is the number of blocks moved from 0-150. A higher score indicates improvement. Effect size is reported (quantified difference between baseline and time point). The larger the absolute value, the stronger the effect. Cohen's guidelines for social sciences indicate 0.10 as a "small" effect size, 0.30 as a "medium" effect size, and 0.50 as a "large" effect size.

  11. Box & Blocks (B&B) Assessment - Left

    Time frame: Change from Baseline at 2, 6, 11, 16, 21 and 27 weeks

    A standardized clinical assessment of gross upper limb dexterity. Subjects move small blocks from one side of a box to the other within a time period (one minute). Each side is tested separately. The score is the number of blocks moved from 0-150. A higher score indicates improvement. Effect size is reported (quantified difference between baseline and time point). The larger the absolute value, the stronger the effect. Cohen's guidelines for social sciences indicate 0.10 as a "small" effect size, 0.30 as a "medium" effect size, and 0.50 as a "large" effect size.

  12. Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) - Physical

    Time frame: Change from Baseline at 2, 6, 11, 16, 21 and 27 weeks

    A 29-item self-report tool that measures the impact of MS on day-to-day life. There are 3 scores, physical, psychological, and total score. Raw scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale. A higher score indicates a greater impact of disease on daily function. Effect size is reported (quantified difference between baseline and time point). The larger the absolute value, the stronger the effect. Cohen's guidelines for social sciences indicate 0.10 as a "small" effect size, 0.30 as a "medium" effect size, and 0.50 as a "large" effect size.

  13. Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) - Psychological

    Time frame: Change from Baseline at 2, 6, 11, 16, 21 and 27 weeks

    A 29-item self-report tool that measures the impact of MS on day-to-day life. There are 3 scores, physical, psychological, and total score. Raw scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale. A higher score indicates a greater impact of disease on daily function. Effect size is reported (quantified difference between baseline and time point). The larger the absolute value, the stronger the effect. Cohen's guidelines for social sciences indicate 0.10 as a "small" effect size, 0.30 as a "medium" effect size, and 0.50 as a "large" effect size.

  14. Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS)

    Time frame: Change from Baseline at 2, 6, 11, 16, 21 and 27 weeks

    A self-report tool that assesses the perceived impact of fatigue on daily activities. Consists of 21 items selected from the Fatigue Impact Scale. Scored on a 0-84 scale. A higher score indicates a greater impact of fatigue on daily activities. Effect size is reported (quantified difference between baseline and time point). The larger the absolute value, the stronger the effect. Cohen's guidelines for social sciences indicate 0.10 as a "small" effect size, 0.30 as a "medium" effect size, and 0.50 as a "large" effect size.

  15. Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM)

    Time frame: Change from Baseline at 6, 11, 16, 21 and 27 weeks

    The GMFM a standardized observational instrument that measures change in gross motor function. Subscales include lying & rolling; sitting; crawling & kneeling; standing; and walking, running & jumping. For the complete test, the raw scores are converted to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating greater functional mobility. The items that we used were scored on a 0-3 scale and changes reported in percent improvement. Performance-based and tested in participants who possessed the ability to perform the assessment. Effect size is reported (quantified difference between baseline and time point). The larger the absolute value, the stronger the effect. Cohen's guidelines for social sciences indicate 0.10 as a "small" effect size, 0.30 as a "medium" effect size, and 0.50 as a "large" effect size.

  16. Slump Test

    Time frame: Change from Baseline at 2, 6, 11, 16, 21 and 27 weeks

    Measures and quantifies changes in trunk control during functional sitting. It was quickly determined that this test duplicated the TIS and was difficult to score objectively so the decision was made not to use it for the study. Performance-based and tested in participants who possessed the ability to perform the assessment.

  17. Modified Rivermead Mobility Index

    Time frame: Change from Baseline at 2, 6, 11, 16, 21 and 27 weeks

    An 8 item assessment that quantifies the ability to perform transfers. It has been validated in persons with stroke and a mixed neurologic population (43% MS). Score is a 0-40 scale. A higher score indicates higher function. Performance-based and tested in participants who possessed the ability to perform the assessment. Effect size is reported (quantified difference between baseline and time point). The larger the absolute value, the stronger the effect. Cohen's guidelines for social sciences indicate 0.10 as a "small" effect size, 0.30 as a "medium" effect size, and 0.50 as a "large" effect size.

Other outcomes

  1. Video Nystagmography (VNG)

    Time frame: Change from Baseline at 2, 6, 11, 16, 21 and 27 weeks

    VNG is a standardized eye tracking test used to measure static and dynamic eye movement control to detect oculomotor abnormalities typically associated with degenerative neurological disorders, particularly in the brainstem and cerebellum. The subject wears goggles while an infrared video camera monitors and records eye movement as the eyes follow a dot on a computer screen.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Wisconsin, Madison

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2014
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2017
First posted
Sep 30, 2014
Registry last updated
Jul 9, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.