School and Graduate Institute of Physical Therapy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University
Taipei, Zhongzheng, 100, Taiwan
NCT Number: NCT06140212
This study aims to (1) compare the assessment outcome of the ICOPE-I and ICOPE-S, and (2) investigate the correlation between both versions of the ICOPE step 1 screening tools and frailty in Taiwan.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me65 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Taipei, Zhongzheng, 100, Taiwan
The prevalence of frailty among the elderly increases annually as the population ages. The World Health Organization (WHO) has introduced the Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE) framework, which aims to support healthy aging by evaluating the intrinsic capacity (IC) of the elderly in six different areas. In Taiwan, two versions of the ICOPE step 1 screening tools are available: an interview-based version (ICOPE-I) and a self-administered version (ICOPE-S) based on the WHO's model. There are two main models for frailty status assessments: Dr. Fried's phenotype of frailty and Dr. Rockwood's accumulation of deficit models. A comparative study is necessary to assess the consistency of both versions of ICOPE in Taiwan and their associations with frailty.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
MoCA would be used to assess participants cognitive functioning.
The ICOPE screening tool would be used to assess participants health status, including cognitive decline, auditory and visual capabilities, mobility restrictions, nutritional status, and depressive symptoms.
The Edmonton frail scale and Frailty criteria by Dr. Fried would be used to assess participants frailty status.
Time frame: The ICOPE screening tool assessment would take about 10 minutes
ICOPE screening tool (self-administration and interview version) would be used to evaluate the intrinsic capacity(IC), including cognitive decline, auditory and visual capabilities, mobility restrictions, nutritional status, and depressive symptoms) of the participants.
Each question requires a binary response, either 'yes' or 'no'. A "total score" will be determined by summing the number of IC impairments, which have a score range of 0-6, with higher scores indicating a greater degree of impairment.
Time frame: The phenotype of frailty status assessment would take about 10 minutes
Frailty criteria by Dr. Fried would be used to evaluate the frail status of the participants.The Dr. Fried phenotype of frailty comprises five components, unintentional weight loss, exhaustion, weakness, slowness, and low activity. Individuals who exhibit three or more indicators are classified as frail, those with one to two indicators are categorized as pre-frail, and those with no indicators are characterized as robust.
Time frame: The accumulated frailty status assessment would take about 10 minutes
Edmonton frail scale(EFS) would be used to evaluate the frail status of the participants. EFS assesses a wide range of nine domains through 11 questions. These domains cover cognition, general health status, functional independence, social support, medication use, nutrition, mood, continence, and functional performance. The total score of EFS ranges from 0 to 17, where scores of 0-5 indicate not being frail, 6-7 indicate being vulnerable, 8-9 indicate mild frailty, 10-11 indicate moderate frailty and 12-17 indicate severe frailty.
Time frame: The cognitive status assessment would take about 10 minutes
MoCA would be used to evaluate the cognitive functioning of the participants. MOCA comprises attention and concentration, executive function, memory, language ability, visuospatial construction, abstract concepts, calculation, and orientation. The cumulative score amounts to 30 points, with a minimum standard of 26 points or higher. 25-18 points indicate mild cognitive impairment, 17-10 points indicate moderate cognitive impairment, fewer than 10 points indicate severe cognitive impairment.
National Taiwan University Hospital
Other
Exploring the Relationship Between the Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE) Framework and Frailty Among Community-dwelling Elderly Individuals
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07080554
Community-dwelling Elderly, Institutionalized Older Adults
Badajoz, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT07573800
Community-dwelling Elderly
Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT07580144
Atrophy, Frailty
Konya, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT05629728
Frailty, Pathologic Processes
Daejeon, South Korea
View Trial Details